Assessment of Educator Preparation Programs

1. Assessment of Educator Preparation Programs College of Arts and Humanities College of Education College of Science and Mathematics College of Social Sciences Richards College of Business

2. NCATE/PSC • The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications, candidate and graduate performance, and unit operations to evaluate and improve the performance of candidates, the unit, and its programs. • Reflects professional standards • Regularly evaluated by professional community • Comprehensive and integrated measures of candidates, programs, unit • Multiple assessments at admission, entry to field experience, exit from field experience, program completion, and graduate follow up • Assessments and procedures are free of bias, fair, and consistent

3. Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation • The unit maintains an assessment system that provides regular and comprehensive information on applicant qualifications, candidate proficiencies, competence of graduates, unit operations, and program quality. • Uses multiple assessments from internal and external sources • Collects data from applicants, candidates, recent graduates, faculty, and other members of the professional community • Regularly and systematically collects, compiles, aggregates, summarizes, and analyzes data to improve candidate performance, program quality, and unit operations • Disaggregates assessment data for alternate route, off-campus, and distance learning programs • Maintains records of formal candidate complaints and documentation of their resolution • Maintains its assessment system through the use of information technologies appropriate to the size of the unit and institution

4. Program Improvement • The unit regularly and systematically uses data, including candidate and graduate performance information, to evaluate the efficacy of its courses, programs, and clinical experiences. • The unit analyzes program evaluation and performance assessment data to initiate changes in programs and unit operations. • Faculty have access to candidate assessment data and/or data systems. • Candidate assessment data are regularly shared with candidates and faculty to help them reflect on and improve their performance and programs.

5. Key Assessments • The unit administers multiple assessments in a variety of forms and aligns them with candidate proficiencies. These may come from: • end-of-course evaluations, written essays, or topical papers, as well as from tasks used for instructional purposes (such as projects, journals, observations by faculty, comments by cooperating teachers, or videotapes) • activities associated with teaching (such as lesson planning, identifying student readiness for instruction, creating appropriate assessments, reflecting on results of instruction with students, or communicating with parents, families, and school communities • information from external sources such as state licensing exams, evaluations during an induction or mentoring year, employer reports, follow-up studies, and state program reviews.

6. Important Processes • Procedures are established and used to ensure credibility of assessments: fairness, consistency, accuracy, and avoidance of bias • Scoring guides, which may be rubrics, are established for determining levels of candidate accomplishment and completion of their programs • Results from candidate assessments are used to evaluate and make improvements in the unit, and its programs, courses, teaching, and field and clinical experiences. • In the evaluation of unit operations and programs, the unit collects, analyzes, and uses a broad array of information and data from course evaluations and evaluations of clinical practice, faculty, admissions process, advising system, school partnerships, program quality, unit governance, etc.

7. Tk20: A Comprehensive Assessment, Data Management, and Candidate Activity System • Allows for the aggregation/disaggregation of important data at candidate, course, program, and unit levels • Facilitates relating of key assessments with professional standards • Facilitates collaboration between faculty, students, and professional partners • Provides secure environment where candidates build and submit assessments, faculty and supervisors evaluate within the environment, and individual and aggregate data resulting from the assessments are immediately available • Establishes relationships between key assessments and transition points, making it possible to track progress over time and pinpoint areas at unit/program/course levels that may be targets for improvement • Includes modules for management of candidate activities (e.g. placements, applications, surveys) • Supports development of candidate portfolios for internal and external use