1 / 60

ニュートリノ物理 発展と動向

ニュートリノ物理 発展と動向. What do we know today? Solar Neutrino results (SK & SNO) First direct observation of oscillation in solar n Atmospheric neutrino results Atmospheric n deficiency : n m n t LSND and KARMEN More than 3 neutrinos? Present status of K2K What should be (shall be) done next

archer
Download Presentation

ニュートリノ物理 発展と動向

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ニュートリノ物理発展と動向 • What do we know today? • Solar Neutrino results (SK & SNO) • First direct observation of oscillationin solar n • Atmospheric neutrino results • Atmospheric n deficiency : nmnt • LSND and KARMEN • More than 3 neutrinos? • Present status of K2K • What should be (shall be) done next • Conclusion ２００２年１月１６日 ＠国際高等研究所 京都大学大学院理学研究科 西川公一郎

  2. 3 GenerationsMNS matrix • 3 angles and 1 phase propagation solar ne : Dm2 <10-4eV2no n3 reactor ne : (Chooze, Pal-Verde) Ue3 ~ small atm. nm : Dm2 >10-3eV2n3and n1, n2

  3. Measurements at Dm2>10-3eV2(L/E ~ several 100 (km/GeV)) q23, q13, Dm223~Dm213>>Dm212 Three generation ? mixing angle mass difference

  4. Solar neutrinone = n1, n2  nm, nt ? • Standard Solar Model (SSM) and experiments • New SNO results • Super-Kamiokande update to 1286 days • Summary of the status

  5. http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb/ Sources of Solar Neutrinos SNO Each experimentis seeing different sources Standard Solar Modelrelates different kinds of experiments

  6. Solar Neutrino Experiments(as ofn2000) +1.4 8.1 -1.1 +8 75 -7 Target Data / SSM (BP2000) ・ Homestake 37Cl 0.32±0.03 ・ Kamiokande e- (water) 0.54±0.07 ・ SAGE 71Ga 0.58±0.06 ・ GALLEX+GNO 71Ga 0.57±0.05 ・ SK e- (water) 0.465±0.015 Be  0 B  0.5 then….no need of osc. +9 +0.20 129 1.0 SNU SNU -7 -0.16 74 ±7 0.54±0.07 0.47±0.02 2.56 ±0.23 Homestake SuperK Kamioka SAGE GALLEX (+GNO) 37Cl H2O Ga 7Be pp, pep Experiments Theory CNO 8B

  7. Measurement of 8B (SK and SNO) • SK ne + e  ne + e CC : NC =6:1 (1) • forward peaked • SNO ne + d  e + p + p CC (2) ne + e ne + e CC : NC =6:1 • (1)-(2) NC event rate due to 8B • should be constant for oscillation among active neutrinos • 8B Flux measurement with neutral current interaction • Confirm SSM (Be, B  pp chain = solarluminescence) • Flux (deduced from NC) – Flux (deduced from CC) • = Non ne components • SSM independent evidence of oscillation

  8. New SNO results • Teff=6.75 Mev • No large spectrum distortion • Charged current : ( Q=1.44MeV) ne + D p + p + e (CC) • electron scattering : n+ e  e + n (ES)

  9. SK + SNO combined [x106/cm2/s] SNO CC = 1.750.15 SK ES = 2.320.09 CC =e ES =e +0.154, , = 3.691.13 X = 5.440.99(total active 8B neutrino flux) (SSM = 5.05+1.01/-0.81) SK

  10. 1km(2700mwe) 3km 2km Mozumi Atotsu Super Kamiokande 41.4m Outer detector 1867 of 8” PMT Ikeno-yama Kamioka, Gifu 50kton stainless steel tank 39.3m Inner detector 11146 of 20” PMT

  11. Direction to the Sun n e- qsun May 31, 1996 - Oct.6, 2000 1258 days Ee = 5.0 - 20 MeV ~18500 solarn events (14.7 events/day) COSqsun +0.08 8B flux : 2.32  0.03 [x 106 /cm2/sec] -0.07 Data 0.005 +0.016 = 0.451 SSM(BP2000) -0.013 (using Ortiz et al. spectrum shape(nucl-ex/0003006))

  12. Oscillation parameters based on flux ofHomestake, GALLEX, SAGE and SK only ne has n+e CC ne n2 ne→nm(nt ) 99% C.L. n1 r rc

  13. n oscillation in solar neutrino solar neutrino spectrum Small Mixing angle solution Spectral shape distortion P(ne → ne) Night Large Mixing solution Day/night difference Day Low Day/night in pp n Just-so Seasonal effect, spectral distortion Day/night, spectrum with higher precision

  14. Day/Night Effectregeneration through the earth nm (Night-Day) (Night+Day)/2 ne Earth density:r=5g/cm2 (average),13(at core) Affect to oscillations for Dm2 = 10-6 - 10-4 eV2 1% 2% 10% 80% slight negative N-D = 0.033 0.022(stat.)  (sys.) 0.013 0.012 (N+D)/2

  15. Spectrum shape comparison (0.75, 6.310-11eV2) Justso (6.310-3, 510-6eV2) SMA (0.8, 3.210-5eV2) LMA Bad fit for SMA and Just-so solutions. uncertainties of absolute energy scale, energy resolution, 8B spectrum shape

  16. Excluded by SK zenith angle spectrum at 95%C.L. Allowed by global fit (Cl + Ga + SK flux) at 95%C.L. • nenm(t) • LMA prefered Dm2(eV2) nenm(t) nensterile 95%CL sin22q

  17. Fogli et.al. hep-ph/0106247

  18. Time variation of the flux, seasonal c2 for eccentricity: 3.9 / 7 d.o.f. (79% C.L.) Sunspot # (c2 for flat: 8.1 / 7 d.o.f. (32% C.L.) ) No magnetic field dep. No distance dep. (Just-so)

  19. KamLAND http://www.awa.tohoku.ac.jp/KamLAND Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector • 1000m3 liquid scintillator • 3000m3 oil+water shield • 1300 17-inch PMTs +600 20-inch PMTs • Anti-ne from reactors (L~170km) • Detect e+ from ne + p  e+ + n (Eth = 1.8 MeV)

  20. KamLAND: sensitivity What(3) From K.Inoue (Tohoku Univ.)

  21. Conclusion on solar neutrinos • There is non-electron neutrinos in solar n - neutrino oscillation! • SSM is OK within 20% • Just-so, LOW, and SMA are disfavored • 93 % C.L. by SK zenith-spectrum analysis for ne→nm(nt ) oscillations. • Sterile is disfavored with 95% C.L. by zenith-spectrum. • Energy spectrum is consistent with flat. • day/night difference is 3.3±2.2 +1.3/-1.2 %. • Large angle solution : testable in KAMLAND • Also by Borexino

  22. Event topology FC PC Initial neutrino energy spectrum Stopping muons FC + PC Through-going muons stopping muons Interaction in the rock through-going muons

  23. Zenith angle distribution (Soudan 2) HiRes events (106.3±14.7 nm, 132.8±13.4 ne) log(L/En) Decay excluded by 2 s cos Q

  24. Zenith angle distribution No oscillation Δm2=2.5x10-3 sin22θ=1.0 (best fit)

  25. nm-nt allowed region FC + PC + up-through + up-stop + Multi-ring χ2min=142.1/152dof @(Δm2,sin22θ)=(2.5x10-3,1.0)

  26. nmnt v.s. nmns C.C. N.C. nt X ○ nsXX • NC in the earth ( matter effect ) • PC, up through μ(high energy)  FC (low energy) • ntCC interaction in SK detector t appearance

  27. matter effect in the earth sin22θ ( -cos2θ)2+sin22θ sin22θ～1, Eν>20GeV  sin22θm≪1 sin22θm = 2VEν Δm2 νμーνs νμーνs νμーντ νμーντ up through going μ <Eν>～100GeV vertical/horizontal ratio PC, Evis>5GeV <Eν>～25GeV up/down ratio

  28. nmnt v.s. nmns νμーνs νμーνs νμーντ νμーντ data νμーνs νμーντ NC enrigh multi ring event up/down ratio up through μ vertical/horizontal ratio high energy PC up/down ratio

  29. nmntappearance study CC nt interaction ντ + N → τ + N’ +π+π... mnn, enn, n+hadrons(p,p,....) Many hadrons are produced. t enriched sample Optimized by using only downward going events. compare upward going data and MC. +8 - 11 43±17 42% 103±41 # of obs. τ efficiency # of τ (eff. corrected) νμ-ντ with ντCC νμ-ντ w/o ντCC +18 - 26 • ～2σ excess of τ-like events. • Data are consistent with νμ-ντ oscillation • with ντCC.

  30. Summary of atmospheric neutrino observation • Oscillation parameters for nm nt : Dm2 = 1.6 ~ 3.6 x 10-3 eV2, sin22q > 0.90 (90%CL) • Decay scenario is disfavored with > 2sfor ldcy>>losc and ldcy<<losc • nm ns is strongly disfavored • Excess from t leptons: 1.5 ~ 2s • Future • Implement 3D flux calculations • Study more on t-lepton production • Study on the mixed final state nt+ ns

  31. LSND and KARMEN Stopping p only p+decay p-absorbed in nuclei ne+p→e++n n+A→A’+g 

  32. LSND-Karmen-Nomad comparison Small Dm2 region remains

  33. n mass - oscillationsallowed regions LSND, if true, more than 3 neutrinos ? No sign in solar and atmospheric neutrino obs.

  34. K2K( Testing atmospheric observation with accelerator neutrino beam) • Distance and direction fixed neutrino energy (En) • Neutrino beam just after birth • 99%nm (decay volume) L=250km

  35. Bird’s Eye Neutrino Beam Line

  36. Spectrum Distortion at Off axis(4 mrad) (MC) 1 mradian accuracy is more than enough

  37. stability pm＋n m-monitor ２００ｍ １ｃｈ＝５ｃｍ 　　＝０．２５ mrad. <1mrad. +1mrad. -1mrad.

  38. 300m from target Fine Grained Detector Near neutrino detector

  39. Neutrino Beam Direction(MRDprofile) Fitted center x: 1±5cm y: －10±4cm Centered within sys. err. of 20cm SK direction (0.7mrad). 400cm near det. 標的 300m x, x q

  40. Stability of Spectrum Muon Energy of MRD events Muon Energy of 1kton events

  41. K2K Results(June ‘99 – July ‘01) • Number of events • 1 kton water Chrenkov detector  SK almost counting experiment • NC/CC, spectrum shape, interaction model errors almost cancell • Spectrum distortion • non-QE , NC must be subtracted

  42. GPS SK Events Tspill TSK TOF~1msec No Decay-e HE Trig. Evis cut (30MeV) No act. in OD(fully contained) Exp’ed Atm n BG <10-3 in 1.5ms window 56 in fid. vol. -0.2<TSK-TSpill-TOF<1.3msec 1msec

  43. Dominant Systematic Errors • uncertainty of far-near ratio (~7%) and • uncertainty of 1kt fiducial volume (~4%).

  44. MC w/o osc. Reconstructed En and muon directionFully contained 1-ring m-like (22.5kt) Note: Dm2=310-3 eV2 corresponds to 600 MeV En Need to estimate syst. err.

  45. Summary of K2K • Accumulated 4.5x1019POT @ SK from Jun ’99 to July ’01. (1.0 1020 protons in 2004) • Neutrino beam is well under control Can extrapolate spectrum and flux from Near to Far • # of fully contained events in fiducial volume @ SK Observed: 56, Expected with null oscillation 80 Probability of null oscillation < 3% • Spectrum analysis, especially improving low energy region, just started • Pion production measurements @ CERN (HARP) • Upgrade in summer 2003 +7.3 -8.0

  46. Atmospheric neutrinos • Where (m2 =1.6·10-3 ~ 4·10-3 eV2 ,sin22q >0.89) • Most likely nmnt • Solar neutrinos • LMA likely Large q12 ,Dm212 ~10-5: CPV asym. can be large • Reactor neutrinos • sin22q13<0.1 for atmospheric Dm2 region • K2K • Decrease over 250km of ~1GeV neutrino • Spectrum distortion • Minos, MiniBooNE, CGN, Kamland • Oscillation pattern, ntappearance, LSND, LMA • What is the best bet for the next step ?

  47. Final goal (my own view) • Our own existence ? • (near) GUTs scale physics • Mass-Interaction : mixing (q13<<q12,q23or q13<q12,q23?) • Small neutrino mass • Existence of CP-violation in lepton sector (lepto-genesis) • Baryon number non-conservation • Very massive detector

  48. CPV in Kaon system was discovered just below Adair’s measurement • CP phase is large in K,B (Jarlskog factor is small) • No theorist predicted large mixing q23 • No strict prediction on q13 , d • 14 order of magnitude extrapolation for proton decay prediction • One order of magnitude improvements are worth the effort ! • Major discoveries may be around the corner

More Related