330 likes | 845 Views
2. Lecture 2. Lecture 2 ? Friday 9 May 2008 This lecture discusses the impact that foreign direct investors have on host economies. Different theories and empirical evidence will be considered. We will also discuss why Governments are very active in attracting foreign multinationals and what are t
E N D
1. 1 Multinational Corporations in the Global Economy
2. 2 Lecture 2 Lecture 2 – Friday 9 May 2008
This lecture discusses the impact that foreign direct investors have on host economies. Different theories and empirical evidence will be considered. We will also discuss why Governments are very active in attracting foreign multinationals and what are the expected benefits of foreign direct investment.
Reading:
Lipsey R.E. (2002) Home and host country effects of FDI, NBER Working Paper 9293.
3. 3 Goverments attitudes towards FDI
4. 4 Goverments attitudes towards FDI
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7 Effects on the host country
Governments spend part of their budgets in attracting FDI because they believe that FDI will generate positive effects on their country
What happens when multinational companies invest in a host country?
How does it contribute to the country’s economic growth and prosperity?
Important for host countries that are poor or in an industrialisation phase
How can we measure the effects
Economic effects
Other effects on society and environment (Lecture 3)
8. 8 Economics effects
Operations and behaviour of the subsidiary
Higher Wages
Higher efficiency
Higher exports
Effects of the subsidiary on domestic firms
Wage Spillovers
Productivity & Knowledge Spillovers
Export Spillovers
Start up of new industries
9. 9 Wages
MNC typically pay higher wages than local firms – esp. in developing countries
In 1931 a study documented that
“…Colombian labor…is better remunerated and granted more sanitary living quarters by foreigners than by natives, but the foreigners probably extract more systematic and strenuous effort”
Initial studies did not take into account:
The quality of workers employed
The size of the firms
The sophistication of the activities
10. 10 Wages
More recent studies take these dimensions into account and find that:
MNC pay +25% in Mexico (1970)
MNC pay + 70% in Marocco (+30% if controlled by size)
MNC pay +50% in Indondesia (1990s)
Some studies find that MNC pay higher prices for people with higher education (higher quality), while for blue collar differences are minimal
11. 11 Wages
Why would a firm pay more wages than its competitors in the host country?
Host country regulations or home country pressures
To maintain “good public relations” with local government and host environment
It pays a premium for reducing turn-over
To attract better workers
12. 12 Wage Spillovers
Wage spillovers = when the higher wages of MNC produce an effect on the wages of employees in domestic firms
13. 13 Wage spillovers
When they occur, why do they occur?
By raising the demand of labour (+)
By skill upgrading (+)
By substracting the better workers to domestic firms (-)
14. 14 Productivity
Productivity indicates how efficient is the production process – i.e. how much output a firm produces given its inputs
E.g. n° pair of shoes/hour; value added per worker…
Economists generally assume that MNC have higher productivity than domestic firms, especially in developing countries
E.g. MNC have access to superior technologies
Several studies document this in a number of developing countries (Uruguay, Moroc, Indonesia, Mexico, etc.)
15. 15 Productivity Spillovers
“Theories of the effect of direct investment on host countries have generally taken it for granted that foreign-owned firms possessed superior technology and that some of that technological knowledge spills over to the host country economy” (Lipsey, 2002, p.41)
16. 16 Productivity Spillovers
The benefits to the host countries, if they exist, stem mainly from the superior efficiency of the foreign- owned operations
Economists look at whether MNC superior productivity spills over to locally- owned firms in their industries, or their industries within their regions, or related industries.
17. 17 Productivity Spillovers
Positive:
When the increase of FDI in an industry leads to an increase in productivity of domestic firms in the same industry (horizontal spillovers) or in industries that are vertically connected (vertical spillovers)
Negative:
When the increase of FDI in an industry leads to an decrease in productivity of domestic firms in the same industry (horizontal spillovers) or in industries that are vertically connected (vertical spillovers)
18. 18 Positive Productivity Spillovers
Locally- owned firms might increase their efficiency by:
Copying the operations of the foreign- owned firms;
Being forced by competition from foreign- owned firms to raise their efficiency to survive
Qualify and improve the skills of local human resources
The transfer of knowledge through backward linkages with domestic suppliers
19. 19 Negative Productivity Spillovers
20. 20 What are the effects on domestic firms?
21. 21 Why in some cases there are effects and in other not? What do you think are the factors that limit/favour the transfer of technologies in developing countries?
22. 22 The capabilities of domestic firms Even to adopt, adapt and imitate countries and firms need a minimum of absorptive capacity (Cohen, Levinthal, 1990)
Human resources (training, education)
Investment in experimentation, R&D
23. 23 What do you think it is the % R&D/GDP of…. US?
UK?
Italy?
China?
Brazil?
Other developing countries???
24. 24
25. 25 Science & Technology Indicators
26. 26 2. Behaviour of MNC subsidiaries Economists almost always conceive MNC subsidiaries as having ‘advanced’ skills/ technologies with respect to domestic firms
Economists also assume that R&D is centralised in the Headquarters and that subsidiaries are just a ‘passive’ local branch of the MNC
27. 27 In other terms, economists conventional model is: Very hierarchical. But, how much technology will they be able to transfer if nothing happens in their subsidiaries?6Very hierarchical. But, how much technology will they be able to transfer if nothing happens in their subsidiaries?6
28. 28 But from Lecture 1 we know… Subsidiaries are different: some are more innovative than others
Local adaptor: limited mandate, only minor adaptation at the local level
International adaptor: more creative local laboratories, eg. To adapt technologies for a continent (Latin America, Asia) not just a country
International creator: Internationally interdependent laboratories which provide inputs into a centrally coordinated R&D program
Which do you think have a higher potential for positive productivity spillovers?
29. 29 3. National Policies Is there a need for governments to promote actively the creation and deepening of linkages? …Markets may fail to create efficient linkages, raising the cost to both parties of entering into long-term supply relationships and reducing the ability of domestic firms to become competitive suppliers (UNCTAD, World Investment Report, 2001)
Rules of origin/Local content requirements: preferential treatments based on the level of value added or local content
Example: the entry of Suzuki in Hungary was done to enjoy duty-free access for car exports to the EU, and it was subject to the creation of local linkages
30. 30 Exports and new industries
MNC can have two further effects:
Export Spillovers: Because they on average export more than local firms, they generate export spillovers on domestic firms
Generation of new industries:
The case of Ireland and Costa Rica and the generation of new high tech industries
31. 31 FDI and the creation of a new industry: the case of Costa Rica “…Costa Rica represents an outstanding success story of a small economy being able to increase and diversify its exports and attracting significant FDI inflows into its economy.” (OECD, 2004; p. 68)
32. 32 Costa Rica: structural change 1984: beginning of the Export Processing Zones policies
1990: boom of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) in high tech industries
Electronics, microprocessors, medical devices
Costa Rica strength
Relatively skilled human resources
Proximity to USA
Macroeconomic and political stability
33. 33 Evolution of main export sectors’ shares (2-digit SITC Rev 1)