290 likes | 303 Views
Analyzing the design, implementation, and operation of WSNs, incorporating power management, surveillance systems, and scheduling for efficient monitoring. Jack Stankovic's detailed analysis from 2007 provides insights into achieving optimal system performance. Explore practical applications, programming, and validation services for extending the lifespan of sensor networks.
E N D
Full Life Cycle Analysisfor Wireless Sensor Networks Jack Stankovic Computer Science University of Virginia January 10 , 2007
Require design time analysis to obtain approximate system design – do this with few assumptions Redo analysis as a function of subsequent design choices Specific routing protocol Analysis of various types required at all phases of system design, implementation, and operation Require a tool/framework for combining multi-stage analysis Main Themes of Talk
Acoustic Magnetometer Four 90 degree motion sensors XSM motes - Crossbow VigilNet - Power Aware Surveillance ACM TOSN, Feb. 2006
Energy Efficient Surveillance System 1. An unmanned plane (UAV) deploys motes Zzz... Sentry 3. Sensor network detectsvehicles and wakes up the sensor nodes 2. Motes establish an sensor network with power management
Self-organize (partition) sensor network into multiple sections (one per base station). Turn off all the nodes in dormant sections. Apply sentry-based power management in tripwire sections Flexible scheduling, sections rotate to balance energy. Dormant Active Dormant Dormant Dormant Active Dormant Dormant Active Active Tripwire-based Surveillance Road
A common period p and duty-cycle βis chosen for all sentries, while starting times Tstart are randomly selected Sentry Duty-Cycle Scheduling Non-sentries Sentries A t B t Target Trace C A D t E D C t B E t 0 p 2p Sleeping Awake
Design Time Analytical Programming Time Execution time, memory, delays, … Debugging Time Operational, fix bugs, race conditions Field Testing Time Overhear, replay System Lifetime Validation services Life Cycle Analysis
Extensible Design Tool Model and analyze WSN “early” Iterate to obtain final configuration Integrate analysis into a design tool - Plug-ins Target tracking analysis Communication schedulability analysis … Extend AADL/OSATE framework Used extensively for real-time and embedded systems CMU/SEI ANDES
Performance Attributes Lifetime Sensing coverage Communication Capacity Reliability QoS Security System Parameters Number of nodes Density Duty cycle Sensing Range Communication range Bandwidth Design Time
First Level of Analysis Probability of detection Average detection delay Density d Duty cycle b Period T Sensing range R Length of Path L Speed of target v (stationary, slow, fast) Impact on lifetime Tracking Analysis
βT l R Obtain Probability of Detection Node target locus βT+l/v Probability of detection (βT+l/v ) /T T 0 l/v t l/v Time interval when the target is in the sensing area βT Time interval when the node is awake in one period
R (x,y) R L Consider All Possible Locations For a fast target with velocity v l target locus A
Formulas for Detection Delay Expected Detection Delay for Fast Targets: Expected Detection Delay for Slow Targets: where * DCOSS paper
Minimum energy gives 1.3s detection delay Expected Delay vs. β
Realistic Sensing AreasFormulas Validated What do real sensing areas look like?
Next level of analysis Are expected end-to-end data flows going to meet their deadlines? Fn(bandwidth, deadlines, periods, workloads) Impact on lifetime Real-Time Communication Analysis
Schedulability Analysis – Example Network topology Stream specification Communication parameters Result: Schedulable Communication Link from node 1 to 2 is assigned to stream 1 at time slot 1 Communication Link from node 3 to 5 is assigned to stream 3 at time slot 1 ••••••
Analysis includes The impact of interference Streams’ time constraints Multi-hop communication Assumptions Perfect collision-free MAC protocol Fixed routing Constant communication and interference range No transmission failure RT Scheduling Analysis
Analogous to real-time scheduling theory Prioritize streams (velocity) Schedule stream 1 Schedule stream 2 assuming stream 1 exists Account for time, BW and interference Keep adding streams until All streams successfully scheduled All streams up to stream X successfully scheduled Solution - Exact Characterization
Implementation of Analysis Can be very general
VigilNet Surveillance System 1. An unmanned plane (UAV) deploys motes Zzz... Sentry 3. Sensor network detectsvehicles and wakes up the sensor nodes 2. Motes establish an sensor network with power management
Adistributed service that achieves repeatability via asynchronous event recording and replay Main Idea of EnviroLog Input Log modules Output Target modules Enviro- Log Flash Record Stage
A distributed service that achieves repeatability via asynchronous event recording and replay Input Main Idea of EnviroLog Log modules Output Target modules Enviro- Log Flash Replay Stage
System evaluation Suite of real tests recorded and replayed Debugging Exact same tests Protocol comparison in real setting Exact same tests Parameter tuning Exact same tests Wider testing than possible with physical system (e.g., speed up capability exists) Valuable for rare, unsafe or hard to reproduce events Fire, explosion, … Uses of EnviroLog
Require Initial Analysis to Approximate Design Parameters Refine Based on Design Decisions – analysis accounts for those decisions Validation of the Early Analysis via Empirical Data Value of AADL basic features/analysis Integration among Life Cycle Analyses A comprehensive and consistent toolkit Summary
VigilNet – large team at UVA (Tian He, …) ANDES – (Vibha Prasad, …) Tracking Analysis – (Ting Yan, …) Envirolog – (Liqian Luo, …) Papers available on each of these topics Acknowledgements