100 likes | 256 Views
European Policy and the Practice of Worker Representation on Health and Safety Laurent Vogel ETUC. Safety Reps in the European Union. Laurent Vogel HESA department ETUI-REHS. Historical background. A double input from the ’70s New workers ’ strategies for health and safety
E N D
European Policy and the Practice of Worker Representation on Health and Safety Laurent VogelETUC
Safety Reps in the European Union Laurent Vogel HESA department ETUI-REHS
Historical background • A double input from the ’70s • New workers ’ strategies for health and safety • Workers’ control on strategic aspects of management: the debate on the introduction of new technologies • At EU level: a post-68/73 agenda • The « Vredeling directive » proposal • A new negative context from 79/first 80s
The Framework Directive as a compromise (1) • OSH a central priority for social policy in the EU (from the Single Act in 1986) • Less divergences • Already a consolidated tradition • The illusion of a non conflictive area dominated by technical approach • Linked with the market unification (machine directive, chemicals)
The Framework Directive as a compromise (2) • « Balanced participation » • Something more than information and consultation • No clear definition • National practice … • Coexistence of two conceptions • Management just informs… • Workers and their organisation as an central agent
An era of topdown reforms • In most of the countries • Systematic management is strongly consolidated: risk assessment, prevention plans, preventive services, etc… • Industrial relations system is neglected (go on with the existing system in a context changing dramatically !) • Some exceptions where no specific OSH representation existed • Italy and Spain (Greece and Portugal to a minor extent)
In Eastern Europe • From a Trade Union Control with a context of Party-State dominated TU… • …to a liberal pro-management approach • with some space for safety reps • The debate on TU inspection • The debate on general representation from the workers • The difficulty to define an autonomous TU strategy for OSH
Present situation • Coverage ??? • No systematic monitoring • Excluding factors: • Size • Trade union density • Contingent workers
Structures for safety representation • Elected/nominated by TU • Joint structures/delegates • A OSH specific structure/a general representation structure • Specific common structures from SME’s and worksites: still an exception
An effective intervention ? • Many factors are preconditions • Rights and competences • Links between safety representation and the general OSH management: participatory risk assessment • Trade union strategy