1 / 8

MG REVIEW Office Visit- June/July, 2000 Report Issued- July ___, 2000

MG REVIEW Office Visit- June/July, 2000 Report Issued- July ___, 2000. Confidential. MG Review Review Highlights. Project Objective:

aretha-knox
Download Presentation

MG REVIEW Office Visit- June/July, 2000 Report Issued- July ___, 2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MG REVIEW Office Visit- June/July, 2000 Report Issued- July ___, 2000 Confidential June/July, 2000

  2. MG ReviewReview Highlights Project Objective: We performed an on-site review of processes, procedures and controls that support the MGL and MGMCC trading activities within the London office. Our procedures included interviews with key commercial and accounting personnel. We also performed a test of commodity transactions from deal execution through to settlement entries. Team Members: Office Personnel Interviewed: Brent Price David Tregar - Finance Director Tim Poullain-Patterson Kevin Rhodes - Director MGL Nic Swingler - AA Howard Carter - Director MG MCC Hassaan Majid - AA John Lunzer - Traffic Manager Socrates Paschalis - AA Alan Jameson- MGMCC Credit Manager Peter McKee - AA Jon Barrett- MGL Risk Compliance Officer Ati Othman - AA June/July, 2000

  3. MG Review Observations • EFFECTIVE CONTROLS • Single system (AS-400) utilized for deal processing from deal entry to General Ledger and all deal updates are captured within that system • Contracts are reviewed and signed by both the trader who executed the deal and the Head Trader before being sent to counterparties • Counterparty Credit limits available to traders on-line • All payments must be authorized by two MG directors before Treasury will process a payment • Deals are reconciled twice per day between the AS-400, trade blotter and deal tickets; _% of MGL trades automatically matched and cleared through the LME/LCH June/July, 2000

  4. MG Review Observations June/July, 2000

  5. MG Review Observations June/July, 2000

  6. MG Review Observations June/July, 2000

  7. MG Review Observations • AREAS FOR FURTHER REVIEW • Regulatory issues related to the CDL risk book (MG Far East Ltd) • Cash forecasting • Unpriced deal valuation • Master Agreement status • IT security and controls • Wolff integration June/July, 2000

  8. MG ReviewAttributes • MG MCC- Key attributes tested • Deal Capture • Authorized trader • Deal ticket sign-off ( AS-400 printout) • Deal details agree to Draft Faxed Confirmation • Documentation • Confirmation creation date • Time taken to create contract since trade date • Authorized signatory • Counterparty approval date • Contract agrees to AS-400 and Draft Faxed Confirmation • Letter of Credit • Logistics: Physical Deals only • Bill of Lading agrees Invoice • Warehouse release document agrees to Invoice • Consignment stock release agrees to Invoice • Settlement/ Accounting process • Invoice quantity agrees AS-400 • Counterparty Invoice agrees to Payment Instruction Sheet (purchases only) • Invoice agrees to deal data per Confirmation • Disbursements properly approved • AR/AP entry • Physical evidence of cash June/July, 2000

More Related