250 likes | 407 Views
THEORIES AND FOUNDATIONS OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION MÀSTER DE FORMACIÓ DE PROFESSORAT DE SECUNDÀRIA BATXILLERATS I EOIs. Helena Roquet Pugès Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Oct 2013
E N D
THEORIES AND FOUNDATIONS OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITIONMÀSTER DE FORMACIÓ DE PROFESSORAT DE SECUNDÀRIA BATXILLERATS I EOIs Helena Roquet Pugès Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Oct 2013 Grup d’Adquisició de Llengües des de la Catalunya Multilingüe (ALLENCAM) LANGUAGE ACQUISITION IN MULTILINGUAL CATALONIA
OUTLINE • Foreign Language Acquisition paradigms (L2/L3) • StructuralistBehaviorist period Contrastive analysis • Chomskyan period Acquisition studies. Interlanguage. • Environmentalist period Language and communication: THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH
LA RESEARCH PARADIGMS • Structuralist/ Behaviorist period • Contrastive analysis • Chomskyan period • Acquisition studies • Environmentalist period • Language and communication
Structuralist/Behaviourist (1) • Skinner. 1957. Verbal behaviour • L learningis a process of habitformation, a stimulus-response-reactionmechanism • Imitation, repetition, memorisation, practise and reinforcement • Properties of L1 influence L2 learning: Positive/negative transfer (interference). Errors are avoided! • CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF ERRORS
Structuralist/Behaviourist (2) • Positive contribution: • Attentionto oral language (emphasisonspoken L and pronunication) • Identification of factorspresent in LA • Imitation • Repetition • Memory of strategies • Explanation of sometypes of errors • Transfer errors • Languagedistance (affectingachievement)
Structuralist/Behaviourist (3) Negativecontribution: • Attentiontoform and nottomeaning • Learneris a passiverecipient • Learningproceedsbyanalogy • Creativityisnotallowed
LA RESEARCH PARADIGMS • Structuralist/ Behaviorist period • Contrastive analysis • Chomskyan period • Acquisition studies. Interlanguage • Environmentalist period • Language and communication
The Chomskyan period (1) N. Chomsky. 1957. Syntactic Structures. 1959 Review of Verbal Behaviour • Acquisition: Rule-governed behaviour • Learning by analysis and not by analogy • Creativity in L: “Generate an infinite number of sentences from a finite number of rules”
The Chomskyan period (2) • *I goed. • *I eated it. • *She no can go. • *She doesn’t wants to go. • *I saw these mans. • *She cans come.
The Chomskyan period (5) • Research strands: • 1. Stages of acquisition and INTERLANGUAGE • 2. Variability (Sociolinguistic approaches) • 3. Input studies • 4. Linguistic universals (Aurora Bel)
INTERLANGUAGE (1) • Each of thestagesthelearnergoesthroughonhis/herwaytowardsmastery of the target language. Eachstageis a linguisticsystem in itsownright, withspecificfeatureswhichcharacterizeit, known as interlanguage.
INTERLANGUAGE (2) • It is different from the target language. • It has its own internal structure. • Errors are systematic. • It is permeable to input. • At each given moment a particular stage of acquisition is apparent. • Each stage includes forms typical of a previous stage and forms anticipating the next one (Variability).
Pastmorphemeinterlanguagedevelopment • John eat a banana yesterday. • (ref. past no morf.) • She went. She broke. She jump. She walked. • (sporadic use) • She goed. She eated. John breaked. • (overegularitzation) • She went. She walked • (correct use)
Legacy of theperiod • Severalmodelsamongwhich • Krashen (1983. The Natural Approach) Monitor model. • Basedon 5 principles: • Comprehension precedes production • Production emerges in stages(students are notforcedtospeakbeforethey are ready) • Communicativegoals(classroomactivitiesorganisedbytopics, notbygrammaticalstructures) • The instructor mustcreate a goodatmosphere
The Natural Approach (1983, Krashen) 5 hypothesis: • TheAcquisition/Learninghypothesis • TheMonitorhypothesis • TheNatural Orderhypothesis • TheInputhypothesis(emphasisonwhatthe L learnersherebeforethey try to produce L) • TheAffectiveFilterhypothesis
LA RESEARCH PARADIGMS • Structuralist/ Behaviorist period • Contrastive analysis • Chomskyan period • Acquisition studies. Interlanguage • Environmentalist period • Language and communication
Environmentalist period (1) • Languageacquisition: • Complex interaction between the linguistic environment (input) and the learner's internal mechanisms, with neither viewed as primary. Verbal interaction is of crucial importance
Sociolinguistics (2) • Hymes (1971): Different levels of competence involved in language: • Structural • Discourse • Communicative • Strategic • ALL USED IN ‘CONTEXT’: Situation where discourse arises
Discourse Analysis (3) • Austin (1975): Speech act theory • How language is used to do things • YOU CAN SAY ONE SAME MEANING WITH A VARIETY OF FORMS, AND ONE SAME FORM CAN HAVE A VARIETY OF MEANINGS
LANGUAGE IN USE IS COMMUNICATIVE • Real communication is based on interaction. It gives information which the person engaged in conversation with the speaker does not have. • Real communication is always with a purpose. • Real communication contains an element of unpredictability of choices of words. Only in very restricted formulaic expressions language is predictable.
The Communicative Approach • Language is seen as a tool for communicating • Real language practice in the classroom • To develop communicative competence in real communicative context • To develop communicative strategies through interaction • Language is communicative as well as linguistic: grammar + pronunciation + social rules • Focus on functions, not on structures • View that students acquire a language when focusing on meaning, not only in form
The role of grammar in the CA • COMMUNICATIVE TEACHING • + Focus on meaning • + Group work interaction • + Genuine questions • + Opportunities to use lang. creatively • + Opportunities to participate in task negotiations of topics
ENVIRONMENTALISM • Interaction • Negotiation of meaning • ‘Noticing’ new forms in the input
Instructional Implications? Use of authentic materials and tasks Communicative activities such as games and role plays Group and pair work Small number of students interacting Emphasis on functions and meaning, not forms Tolerate errors of form …
CONCLUSION • Learning a second/foreign language it is not completely different from learning a first language, yet it is not entirely the same…..