510 likes | 803 Views
The Vietnam War and American Society: 1954-1975. Deepening American Involvement - Chapter 31:i -. Vietnam has a history of resisting control by other countries for 2000 years (China, Japan, France, and the US). [Image source: http://www.egeltje.org/archives/blah/trungsis.jpg].
E N D
Vietnam has a history of resisting control by other countries for 2000 years (China, Japan, France, and the US). [Image source: http://www.egeltje.org/archives/blah/trungsis.jpg]
During the19th century, France added Cochin-china, Cambodia, Annam, Tonkin, and Laos totheir empire.
Indochina at time of conquest in 1883. [Image source: http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/history/core/pics/0254/img0054.jpg]
By the early 20th century, these areas were combined and administered collectively as French Indo-China.
Vietnam supplied raw materials to France and purchased manufactured goods in-return (Mercantilism).
The empireof Japan temporarily severed this connection, when they occupied Southeast Asia during World War II.
Vietnamese guerillas gained valuable experience opposing the Japanese occupation.
After World War II, the French attemptedto reassert their control over Indochina.
Nationalist Ho Chi Minh lead communist cadresin fighting to expel the French from Vietnam. [Image source: http://www.leksikon.org/images/vo_nguyen_giap.jpg]
The Viet Minh defeated the French at the battle of Dien Bien Phu and forced to surrender their position in Indo-China.
The Viet Minh employed the tactic of “holding on to the belt of the enemy”.
In 1954 a conference was held in Geneva, Switzerland, to determine the fate of Vietnam.
Vietnam was temporarily divided in half – the northern part controlled by the Communists, and the southern part backed by the United States.
Ngo Dinh Diem complicated matters whenhe unilaterally declared South Vietnam an independent republic in 1955.
American support for South Vietnam was based on the fear that communism would spread among neighboring nations (the Domino Theory).
In 1960 President Eisenhower sent 675 military advisers to train South Vietnamese troops.
By the end of 1963, there were more than 16,000 Americans advisers in Vietnam.
To win the ideological war, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara developed the concept of “flexible response” – fighting only as much as needed.
The Viet Cong and the NVA(North Vietnamese Army) didn’t practice “flexible response”.
This led to an escalation in the Vietnam War, with no end in sight.
The Republic of South Vietnam attempted to deprive Viet Cong guerillas of the support fromthe people by relocating them into strategic hamlets.
These strategic hamlets, which were little better than prison camps, helped the government extend control into rural areas.
Increasingly South Vietnam was seen as a puppet of the imperialist Americans. [Image source: http://history1900s.about.com/library/photos/blyviet105.htm]
Buddhist monks, in protesting President Diem’s policies, brought international condemnationof his actions.
President Kennedy communicated to the South Vietnamese military that the United States would not interfere with their effortsto remove President Diem from power.
Three weeks following Diems’ demise, President Kennedy was felled by an assassin’s bullet.
Lyndon Baines Johnson succeeded Kennedy as president, inheriting his commitments to the Republic of South Vietnam. [Image source: http://www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/wj/Vietimages/Cartoons/levine.htm]
In August 1964 North Vietnamese torpedo boats allegedly attacked the destroyer U.S.S. Maddox (DD 731).
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution voted by the Congress gave President Johnson carte blanch to whatever was necessary to defend America’s interests.
President Johnson used the Gulf of Tonkin incident to get Congressional approval for escalating America’s military rôle in Vietnam. [Image source: http://faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change-Viet2.html]
Some people wish to see a similarity between presidents Johnson and George W. Bush, but . . .
Originally, Americans had been advisors, training the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN).
Now the United States took a more-active rôle in propping-up the South Vietnamese government, . .
. . . especially since they proved unable to field an army that could successfully defend their country.
By 1965, the Viet Cong had managed to expand the territory under their control in South Vietnam.
North Vietnamese troops and supplies flowed into South Vietnam via the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
[Image source: http://faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change-Viet2.html]
In spite of large numbers and advanced weaponry, the United States failed to drive the Viet Cong out of South Vietnam. [Image source: http://members.aol.com/veterans/warlib6v.htm]
In early-1968 Viet Cong forces launched the Tet Offensive, striking civilian and military command centres, hoping to spark a a general uprising. [Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tet_Offensive]
Televised images of the brutally of war began to shape public opinion. General Luan summarily executes Viet Cong Officer Van Lem,”codename” Bay Lop (photo by Eddie Adams A.P. 2/68)
President Johnson’s popularity suffered accordingly. [Image source: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-presapp0605-31.html]
What rôle has the media played in contributing to negative public opinion regarding this and other conflicts?
How do the casualty-rates between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War compare?
Today, the mainstream media and social-progressive elites are working hard to make the analogy that the War in Iraq is another Vietnam. [Image source: http://www.neveryetmelted.com/?p=2907]