270 likes | 546 Views
Trainings and capacity building activities in WHO Prequalification Programme. Milan Smid Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines (QSM) Essential Medicines and Policy (EMP). WHO Medicines Prequalification Programme.
E N D
Trainings and capacity building activities in WHO Prequalification Programme Milan Smid Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines (QSM) Essential Medicines and Policy (EMP)
WHO Medicines Prequalification Programme • To increase access to priority medicinal products of acceptable unified standards • Prequalification of medicinal products (PQ) • Evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy based on submitted data • Inspections of manufacturers and clinical testing sites • Listing and follow-up of prequalified medicinal products • Variations, Inspections, Sampling and testing, Requalification • Prequalification of Quality Control Laboratories • Inspections and evaluations • Capacity building
Capacity building • WHO support to the generation of expertise for development, manufacture, control or regulation of medicines Manufacturers Clinical Research Organizations (CROs) Quality control laboratories (QCLs) National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs)
Capacity building • Stimulation to submit for WHO prequalification • Instructions how to produce medicines according to standards of WHO good manufacturing practice • Instructions how to submit dossier for WHO prequalification in compliance with formal and technical standards and how to maintain it • Instructions how regulators may benefit from prequalification and worksharing • Support to strengthening of regulatory systems • Stimulation to prequalify quality control laboratories • Instructions how to prequalify quality control laboratories and be in compliance with good laboratory practice in control laboratory • Instructions about sources of relevant information
Capacity building 1) Trainings 2) Technical assistance 3) Provision of information, standards and regulatory expertise
Capacity building Prequalification Programme in itself is indirectly a capacity building process due to: • Possibility to learn from GMP and GCP inspections • Possibility to learn from deficiency letters • Possibility to learn from public reports
1a) Collective trainings • Seminars and workshops • General – PQ procedures and WHO requirements • Problem oriented • HIV/AIDS, TB, antimalarial or RH products • Pharmaceutical development/paediatric dosage forms, BE/BCS • Trainings of NRA staff and manufacturers frequently combined • Third parties frequently involved • Support is given to trainings organized by others • Focus on "training of trainers" • WHO training materials used, when available (GMP, GPCL))
Main partners in organization of trainings in 2007/2009 • International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) • European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM) • National Regulatory Authorities in South Africa, Tanzania, Estonia, Ukraine, Morocco, Brazil, Jordan, Ghana, Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, Uganda, China • National Quality Control Laboratories in Morocco and Tanzania • East Africa Community (EAC) • Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) • Ministry of Health China, Pakistan, Iran, Morocco • Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) • European Medicines Agency (EMEA) • Drug Information Association (DIA) • Therapeutic Goods Agency Australia (TGA) • Roche Pharmaceuticals
Basic training modules • Principles of WHO prequalification of medicines • Good manufacturing practice • Requirements on quality of medicines • Development of pharmaceutical formulation • Bioequivalence / biopharmaceutical classification system • Principles of WHO prequalification of quality control laboratories and GLPQC May be adapted to specific therapeutic categories of medicines
Trainings organized or supported byEMP/QSM in 2009 (I-XI) (1) • Assessment of pharmaceutical quality in PQP • Copenhagen, Denmark, January 14-16, 2009 • WHO Prequalification programme and requirements • Damascus, Syria, February 8-9, 2009 • WHO Prequalification programme and requirements • Cairo, Egypt, February 11-12, 2009 • Training workshop on ACTs • Kampala, Uganda, February 23-27, 2009 • Training workshop on the Assessment of Multisource Interchangeable Medicines • Mombasa, Kenya, July 10-14, 2009 • Interregional seminar for Quality Control Laboratories • Nairobi, Kenya, September 23-25, 2009 • Quality of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients • Hyderabad, India, September 5-7, 2009
Trainings organized or supported byEMP/QSM in 2009 (I-XI) (2) • Advanced workshop on WHO prequalification of reproductive health products • Jakarta, Indonesia, October 5-8, 2009 • Assessment of bioequivalence data submitted to regulatory authorities • Kiev, Ukraine, October 26-30, 2009. • Manufacture of sterile medicines for SFDA GMP inspectors • Nanjing, China, November 16-20, 2009
Countries where prequalified medicines are manufactured (July 2009)
1b) Individualized trainings • Involvement of assessors from NRAs in PQ assessment • Involvement of inspectors from NRAs in PQ inspections • Rotations of experts from NRAs in WHO HQ • 3 months working experience inside PQ team • Personal development of experts from NRAs and strengthening of PQ Programme by new capacities • Development of focal persons with understanding and confidence to WHO PQ for prequalification networking and products follow-up • Development of new trainers • Motivation of trainees and NRAs to improvement of regulatory practices and future co-operation
2) Technical Assistance • Provision of expert consultants to • Manufacturers • Quality control laboratories • Assistance focuses on • GMP, GCP or GLP compliance • Data development and compilation of dossier • Regulatory guidance • Assistance is separated from the assessment / inspections and may be followed by specific trainings
Conditions for provision of technical assistance Manufacturers: • Participation in the prequalification programme, • Found to be capable and willing to improve • Location in a developing country Products: • Inclusion in the list of expression of interest • High value for Public Health purpose • Poor representation on the Prequalification list.
3) Provision of information • Information related to individual PQ products or manufacturers / CROs • Product list and pending procedures • Public assessment reports (WHOPAR, SPC, PIL) • Public inspection reports (WHOPIR – APIs and FPPs) • Notice of concern / suspension • Development of guidelines and standards • Published training materials / CDs • Technical Briefing Seminars in Geneva • http://www.who.int/prequal • PQ medicines and laboratories, guidelines, training materials
3) Provision of regulatory expertise • Regulators and manufacturers may benefit from public outcomes of WHO expertise (WHOPARs, WHOPIRs, SPCs) • Learning and reference assessment • Facilitation of national authorizations • Saving capacities for national priorities • Considered • Seminars on PQ medicines submitted for national authorizations • Support to sharing of assessments • Support to regional trainings and rotations
Support to rational regulation and development of regulatory systems • Concentration on priority issues most relevant for public health • Improved effectivity and efficiency of work • Co-operation with partners and work-sharing • Facilitated by common standards and administrative requirements
Monitoring of outcomes • Feedback from participants of trainings • Pool of assessors, inspectors and trainers • New applications for prequalification or authorization • Quality of submissions and compliance with requested manufacturing standards • Reliability of laboratory quality control • Improvement in efficiency of regulatory processes and inspections
Contact for communication Milan Smid, M.D., Ph.D. Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines (QSM) Essential Medicines and Policy (EMP) smidm@who.int