200 likes | 333 Views
The set up of the RICO intercomparison case. Louise Nuijens, A. Pier Siebesma and Margreet van Zanten. KNMI and Wageningen University, The Netherlands. Photo courtesy Bjorn Stevens. Initial objective to focus one single day:. January 11 th 2004
E N D
The set up of the RICO intercomparison case Louise Nuijens, A. Pier Siebesma and Margreet van Zanten KNMI and Wageningen University, The Netherlands Photo courtesy Bjorn Stevens
Initial objective to focus one single day: January 11th 2004 • Almost complete suite of measurement facilities present • Average amount of precip : 0.6 mm/day
However, not the best choice: • Atmospheric state variable during the day • No way to derive LS-budget for one specific day • LES results create too vigorous clouds
Alternative: Construct a composite based on a suppressed period from 16/12/04 till 08/01/05 Average precip in this period: 0.34 mm/day
To obtain LS forcings: Use a high-res hindcast for the whole RICO period.
Large Scale Forcings: Hor. T-advection Hor. q-advection subsidence
Budget Analysis -15 -36 + 75 -69 +5 + 10 0.3K/day -6 -11 -125 + 140 - 10 0.05 g/kg /day
Microphysics Nc of case study set to 45
What is a cloud?(or how to define a cloudy/rainy gridcell?) Set up: qc or Nr > 0 (or ) -> not so useful for bin models We need a physically based threshold! Choices:* threshold based on qc/qr or Nc/Nr * waterweighted (to calculate mean N) Preferentially one which is suitable for RICO data analysis as well.
Threshold • Based on qc and qr: 0.01and 0.001 g/kg • Based on Nr 5 per liter Photo courtesy Bjorn Stevens