150 likes | 545 Views
Central Counterparty Opportunities ACSDA, November 2002 Keith C. Kanaga DTCC. Some Trends Which May Influence CCPs. Increasing market growth Straight Through Processing (STP) needs Technology investment Increasing cross-border flows Multiple listings by issuers Internalization
E N D
Central Counterparty Opportunities ACSDA, November 2002 Keith C. Kanaga DTCC
Some Trends Which May Influence CCPs • Increasing market growth • Straight Through Processing (STP) needs • Technology investment • Increasing cross-border flows • Multiple listings by issuers • Internalization • Real-time trade guaranty • Product expansion, integration • Integration of CCPs, CSDs
Focus • Demand for STP • Real-time trade guaranty • Continuing technology investment
Demand for STP • High labor cost • Growth in business volumes • Reduced settlement time periods • Declining cost of IT hardware • Error cost • Operational risks
Real-Time Trade Guaranty • Increased volume increased risk • Volatility and market exposure • Regulatory concerns re systemic risk • Technology as an enabler
Continuing Investment in Technology • Technology enables new solutions, e.g. handhelds, real time trade matching (RTTM), real time risk management • New product development • Demand for integration of new with existing products
Continuing Investment in Tech (cont’d) • Increasing volumes • STP • Rapid implementation requirements • Competition from third parties
Some Opportunities • The good news – all these play directly to CCP strengths • Limitations on achieving success – the cost, finite resources, and effort required to meet these requirements • What can we do to improve our chances of success?
Improving Our Chances of Success • Integration • Already done – CCPs, CSDs, settlement systems, e.g. DTC, NSCC, others • Alliances • To do – others within same national boundaries, e.g. OCC • To do – others across national boundaries; links are a good start
Improving our chances (cont’d) • Systems development • Jointly with other CCPs • Jointly through third-party providers, such as OM • Jointly operated systems – nationally, regionally
Improving our chances (cont’d) • Opportunities for jointly operated systems • Applications Service Provider (ASP) • Business Service Provider (BSP) • Remote processing, or • On-site processing
Benefits of Jointly Operated Systems • Cost reduction • Development • Operation • More rapid implementation • Broader range of products supported • Business continuity
Benefits (cont’d) • Brand name retained (private label) • Low volume products can be supported cost effectively
DTCC’s Plans • Committed to work with other CCPs • In U.S. • Cross-border • Both outsource and provide • Partnering with other firms with proven expertise in financial processing
Central Counterparty Opportunities ACSDA, November 2002 Keith C. Kanaga DTCC