1 / 17

SK KEBAGU

SK KEBAGU. LOCATION: 6.5 km from the main road next to 1Borneo; gravelled , pot-holed and muddied when it rains. COMMUNITY: Mostly Ubians in Kg. Numbak ; Bajaus in Kg. Salimbangun and Kg. Kebagu . STUDENTS: Hardly with kindergarten background. . SK KEBAGU.

artan
Download Presentation

SK KEBAGU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SK KEBAGU LOCATION: 6.5 km from the main road next to 1Borneo; gravelled, pot-holed and muddied when it rains. COMMUNITY: Mostly Ubians in Kg. Numbak; Bajaus in Kg. Salimbangun and Kg. Kebagu. STUDENTS: Hardly with kindergarten background.

  2. SK KEBAGU Pupil Background: Home language- ubian Pupils taught BI, BM and Arabic Pupils taught literacy in 3 languages separate from their home language Many may never achieve literacy in home language School-wide issue Majority of Level 1 pupils are in LINUS programme

  3. SK KEBAGU Year 2 class Similar to a year 1 class with little experience of school setting Issues with classroom management similar to year 1 induction / transition period

  4. SK KEBAGU Classroom observations by teachers that pupils displayed problems at the level of basic alphabet recognition; BM teachers described a similar situation Both teachers identified the need for a short term intervention in years 1 and 2 An accelerated phonics course designed for the class was chosen as the method

  5. SK KEBAGU Before planning, we gave a baseline test to the pupils; The results showed three groups of phonics; One group of phonics which the pupils were comfortable with A group of ‘confused’ phonics, such as ‘b’ confused with ‘p’, ‘s’ with ‘z’, which needed clarified And a group of phonics not recognised by the pupils

  6. SK KEBAGU Using the evidence from the testing, we designed a 7 week intervention (with a little help from a friend) We used the ‘comfortable’ phonics as the basic structure, targeted the confused phonics in pairs to highlight differences, and introduced the ‘unknown’ phonics slowly over the 7 weeks.

  7. SK KEBAGU Hiccups Over-enthusiastic teaching, where the short phonics session lasted much longer than planned (reducing the effectiveness) Over-planning at the outset, where too many ‘new / confused’ phonics were covered in one lesson Classroom management of phonics activities slowed down the original planned timetable

  8. Background of the Study SAMPLING: YEAR 1A & 1B NUMBERS: 30 students each DURATION: 7 – week programme in 2012 DATA: April (Pretest/before intervention) September (Postest/after intervention)

  9. Results YEAR 1A YEAR 1B No. of students with: (+ve) Performance: • 0 - 10 : 2 • 11 - 20 : 4 • 21 - 30 : 5 • 31 - 40 : 4 (-ve) Performance: • 0 - 10: 4 ……………………………………. • 100% performance: 5 No. of students with: (+ve) Performance: • 0 - 10 : 2 • 11 - 20 : 4 • 21 - 30 : 4 • 31 - 40 : 4 • 41 - 50 : 4 • 50 - 60 : 2 (-ve) Performance: 0 - 10: 3 ……………………………………. . 100% performance: 0

  10. Results: Year 1A

  11. Results: Year 1B

  12. Decoding Failures

  13. Background of the Study SAMPLING: YEAR 2B NUMBERS: 30 students DURATION: 7 – week programme in 2012 DATA: April (Pretest/before intervention) September (Postest/after intervention) PROBLEMS: Unable to identify /differentiate the letters.

  14. Problems

  15. Results May September

  16. Results

  17. SK KEBAGU Summary (overview) of results The overall interventions were broadly successful; We could identify where we needed to focus / teach effectively (which phonic areas needed..) We could identify what areas of the intervention needed to be changed during the course We have a large bank of data / evidence for each pupil in Year 1 and 2, describes their individual phonic level (this data did not exist before)- helps us to teach the pupils more effectively The pupils gained phonic awareness across the board, as demonstrated by the results of the final test

More Related