1 / 86

Kennesaw State University

Kennesaw State University. Campus Culture and Climate Assessment Report Results. September 30, 2014. Climate In Higher Education.

arthur-murray
Download Presentation

Kennesaw State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kennesaw State University Campus Culture and Climate Assessment Report Results September 30, 2014

  2. Climate In Higher Education Barcelo, 2004; Bauer, 1998, Kuh & Whitt, 1998; Hurtado, 1998, 2005; Ingle, 2005; Milhem, 2005; Peterson, 1990; Rankin, 1994, 1998, 2003, 2005; Rankin & Reason, 2008; Smith, 2009; Tierney, 1990; Worthington, 2008

  3. Assessing Campus Climate Rankin & Reason, 2008

  4. Campus Climate & Students 1 Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005 2 Cabrera, Nora, Terenzini, Pascarella, & Hagedron, 1999; Feagin, Vera & Imani, 1996; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005. 3 Hale, 2004; Harper & Quaye , 2004; Harper, & Hurtado, 2009; Hurtado, 2003.

  5. Campus Climate & Faculty/Staff 1Settles, Cortina, Malley, and Stewart, 2006 2Sears, 2002 3Costello, 2012; Silverschanz, Cortina, Konik, & Magley, 2007;

  6. Project Overview • Phase IV • Final Report and Presentation

  7. Survey Limitations

  8. Method Limitation

  9. Results Response Rates

  10. Who are the respondents?

  11. Student Response Rates

  12. Employee Response Rates

  13. Results Additional Demographic Characteristics

  14. Respondents by Racial/Ethnic Identity (%)(Duplicated Total)

  15. Respondents by Racial/Ethnic Identity (%)(Unduplicated Total)

  16. Respondents by Gender Identity and Position Status (%) Note: Responses with n’s less than 5 are not presented in the figure

  17. Respondents by Sexual Identity and Position Status (n) Note: Responses with n’s less than 5 are not presented in the figure

  18. 20% of Respondents Identify as Having a Condition that Substantially Affect Major Life Activities

  19. Respondents by Religious/Spiritual Affiliation (%)

  20. Citizenship Status

  21. Undergraduate Students by Current Year (n)

  22. Students’ Residence Note: Table includes student respondents (n = 3,628).

  23. Findings

  24. “Comfortable”/ “Very Comfortable” with:

  25. Challenges and Opportunities

  26. Personal Experiences of Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive or Hostile Conduct

  27. Personal Experiences of Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive or Hostile Conduct

  28. Forms of Experienced Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive or Hostile Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 1,050). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  29. Personally Experienced Based on…(%) Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 1,050). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  30. Personal Experiences of Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive or Hostile Conduct Due to Race (%) (n = 628)¹ (n = 185)² (n = 220) 3 (n = 303)¹ (n = 206)² (n = 226) 3 (n = 82)¹ (n = 38)² (n = 46)3 ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  31. Personal Experiences of Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive or Hostile ConductDue to Religious/Spiritual Affiliation (%) (n = 633)¹ (n = 258)² (n = 47)¹ (n = 29)² (n = 170)¹ (n = 75)² (n = 22)¹ (n = 16)² (n = 149)¹ (n = 60)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  32. Location of Experienced Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 1,050). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  33. Source of Experienced Conduct by Position Status (%)

  34. What did you do? Personal responses: • Was angry (49%) • Felt embarrassed (36%) • Told a friend (31%) • Ignored it (29%) Reporting responses: • Didn’t report it for fear the complaint wouldn’t be taken seriously (14%) • Didn’t know to whom to go (10%) • Did report it but did not feel the complaint was taken seriously (9%) • Reported it to a KSU employee/official (9%)

  35. Qualitative Themes Experienced Exclusionary Conduct

  36. Unwanted Sexual Contact at Kennesaw State University

  37. Unwanted Sexual Contact at KSU

  38. Qualitative Themes Why Unwanted Sexual Contact Went Unreported

  39. Employees WhoSeriously Considered LeavingKSU

  40. Faculty & Staff Who Seriously Considered Leaving KSU

  41. Reasons Faculty and Staff Respondents Considered Leaving KSU

  42. Qualitative ThemesWhy Considered leaving…

  43. 32% (n = 1,086) of Undergraduate Students Seriously Considered LeavingKSU

  44. Undergraduate Students Who Seriously Considered LeavingKSU

  45. Reasons Student Respondents Considered Leaving KSU

  46. Qualitative ThemesWhy Considered leaving…

  47. Perceptions

  48. Respondents who observed conduct or communications directed towards a person/group of people that created an exclusionary, intimidating, offensive and/or hostile working or learning environment… 19% (n = 982)

  49. Form of Observed Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive, or Hostile Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who observed harassment (n = 982). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  50. Observed Exclusionary, Intimidating, Offensive, or Hostile Conduct Based on…(%) Note: Only answered by respondents who observed harassment (n = 982). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

More Related