1 / 13

Janice Fon, Wai Yi Peggy Wong, Shu-hui Peng, Sun-Ah Jun, & Yiya Chen

Some cross-linguistic observations from the Asian languages group on principles of prosodic grouping. Janice Fon, Wai Yi Peggy Wong, Shu-hui Peng, Sun-Ah Jun, & Yiya Chen. Overview.

artie
Download Presentation

Janice Fon, Wai Yi Peggy Wong, Shu-hui Peng, Sun-Ah Jun, & Yiya Chen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some cross-linguistic observations from the Asian languages group on principles of prosodic grouping Janice Fon, Wai Yi Peggy Wong, Shu-hui Peng, Sun-Ah Jun, & Yiya Chen

  2. Overview • Every language we have looked at seems to have some kind of a grouping hierarchy, marked by a variety of phenomena including syllable fusion, positional allophony of segments, pause distribution, tone sandhi domains, boundary tones, pitch range reset, etc. • Some of these phenomena are highly language-specific. For example, if a language does not have tone sandhi, then tone sandhi domains cannot define a level of the hierarchy

  3. Intonation Phrase • Pause • Lengthening • Pitch range reset

  4. Frequency (Hz) Pause and pitch range reset (1)

  5. Frequency (Hz) Pause and pitch range reset (2)

  6. Frequency (Hz) 300 250 200 150 <SIL> 335 223 223 55 3 221 H% <SIL> 223 55 223 33 L% <SIL> 1 0 1 1 0 2 <SIL> 1 0 1 2 lE55+3a33 kO3jIN221 <SIL> * ty55jau223 <SIL> ji lei jau saam gok jing <SIL> ngo dou jau wo 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 time (seconds) Boundary tones (1): H%

  7. Frequency (Hz) 300 250 200 150 H* !H* !H* L+H* L-L% H* L-H% L+H* < L- H* <SIL> state law now requires public construction projects to set aside one percent 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 breath> 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 time (seconds) Boundary tones (2): H%

  8. Some intermediate groupings • Tone sandhi group • Segmental allophony • Loss of tone specification • Syllable fusion • Segmental lenition and deletion

  9. 300 250 200 150 Tone sandhi group /a33 51 33 51 / a21 51 33 33  switch I ask you PragPrt ‘Now, it’s MY turn to ask you’ /a33 51 33 51 / a21 5533 33  switch I ask you PP ‘Now, it’s my turn to ask you’

  10. Frequency (Hz) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 i ma le jang dO TSG IP he she bought starfruit / 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Frequency (Hz) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 i ma le jang dO kUq TSG IP IP he she bought sheep dried peach / 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 time (seconds) Segmental allophony & loss of tone specification

  11. Syllable fusion & loss of tonal specification bùyào=[bjaw] Frequency (Hz) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 hai35 zi men yao51 bu51 yao51 lai35 s3 s0 s0 s3 s0 s0 s3 <B2> <B0> <B5> L% 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 time (seconds)

  12. Frequency (Hz) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 <SIL> 22 33 55 3 % <SIL> 0 1- 0 2 5000 5000 hai22am33 nO55A2 4000 4000 <SIL> hai gam do laak 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 3000 3000 2000 2000 1000 1000 0 0 <SIL> <SIL> 223 223 221 221 221 221 22 22 33 33 HL% HL% <SIL> <SIL> 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 laa221+22 laa221+22 <SIL> <SIL> o o jyun jyun loi loi hai hai wai wai 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 time (seconds) time (seconds) Segmental lenition & deletion

  13. Summary • Similarities • Every language we have looked at seems to have some kind of a prosodic grouping hierarchy • At the intonation phrase level, the realization cues used are fairly universal – pause, pitch reset, lengthening, etc. • Differences • At the intonation phrase level, the degree of which different cues are used is language-specific • At the intermediate level, languages exploit various prosodic groupings – tone sandhi group (Taiwanese Min), segmental allophony (Shanghainese), loss of tone specification (Shanghainese, Mandarin), syllable fusion (Mandarin, Cantonese), segmental lenition and deletion (Cantonese), etc.

More Related