120 likes | 267 Views
Insert your logo here. Addressing rough sleeping in three Australian cities : Private rental , social housing , and return to home communities. Cameron Parsell Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland. Research .
E N D
Insert your logo here Addressing rough sleeping in threeAustraliancities: Privaterental, social housing, and return to home communities Cameron Parsell Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland
Research • Australian Government, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA): Andrew Jones • Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI): Rhonda Phillips • University of Queensland • Multi-method, longitudinal
Contemporary Australian Context • Affluence and ‘Australian identity’ • Rejection of crisis approach to permanently reducing the incidences of homelessness • Headline targets • Interventionalistapproaches • Social Inclusion • Learning from abroad: ‘evidence based’
Street to Home (Sydney and Brisbane) • Street to Home is an integrated means of service delivery to assist people sleeping rough and/or experiencing chronic homelessness (1) immediately exit homelessness, (2) access and sustain stable housing, and (3) realise broader social, wellbeing and health outcomes (social inclusion)
Street to Home (Sydney and Brisbane) • Vulnerable population – stereotypical image of ‘homeless person’ • Housing supply? • Assertive street outreach • Housing access • Housing support and supportive housing? • Non-housing outcomes?
Darwin • Neither the espoused policy objective nor the resources • Different phenomena and different problematisation • Short-term • Return to country • Out of place
Summative comments • Positive advancements • Most vulnerable, deserving or visible? • Common Ground – needed or misguided/paternal? • Resources = self-determination and autonomy • Skillful practice • Poverty and the allure of the city