200 likes | 312 Views
Overall Survival and Updated Disease-Free Survival Results of the NSABP C-08 Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stage II & III Colon Cancer. CJ Allegra, GA Yothers, MJ O'Connell, S Sharif, NJ Petrelli, LH Colangelo, N Wolmark. Traditional Therapeutic Development Paradigm. Safety
E N D
Overall Survival and Updated Disease-Free Survival Results of the NSABP C-08 Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stage II & III Colon Cancer CJ Allegra, GA Yothers, MJ O'Connell, S Sharif, NJ Petrelli, LH Colangelo, N Wolmark
Traditional Therapeutic Development Paradigm Safety Activity in advanced disease Efficacy in advanced disease Test in adjuvant setting
Recent Data Suggests this Paradigm for Adjuvant CRC Development May be Flawed • Oxaliplatin success • Irinotecan fail • Cetuximab fail • Bevacizumab fail • Batting .250!!
Oxaliplatin + Bev in Advanced CRC • E3200 – FOLFOX +/- bev in previously treated CRC 1 • 577 patients randomized • ORR 22.7% v 8.6% (p<0.0001) • PFS 7.3 v 4.7 months (p<0.0001) • OS 12.9 v 10.8 months (p=0.001) • NO16966 – XELOX/FOLFOX +/- bev in untreated CRC 2 • 1401 patients randomized • ORR 38% v 38% (p=0.99) • PFS 9.4 v 8.0 months (p=0.0023) • OS 21.3 v 19.9 months (p=0.077 1 Giantonio et al JCO April, 2007 2 Saltz et al JCO April, 2008
NSABP C-08 Stage ll + lll Strat: # Pos. N Randomize mFF6 mFF6 + B
mFOLFOX 6 + B Ox 85 q2w 6 mo 5FU 2400 (46 hrs) 400 400 LV B:5 mg/kg IVq2 wks x 1yr
C-08Accrual mFF6 mFF6+B Randomized Lost / Ineval Analysis 1356 18 1338 1354 16 1338
C-08 Patient Characteristics (%)
mFF6 mFF6+B P Hypertension 1.8 12 <0.0001 Pain 6.3 11.1 <0.0001 Proteinuria 0.8 2.7 <0.001 Wound Comp 0.3 1.7 <0.001 Grade 3+ Toxicities Increased with Bevacizumab (%)
Grade 3+ Toxicities During the 9 mo Period Beginning 3 mo post Therapy Completion (%)
C-08 DFS – Median FU 56 mos. Borderline significant detriment post landmark. Time-Treatment Interaction Remains Significant P < 0.0001.
Possible Explanations for the Apparent Decrease in Survival After Relapse • Bev changes the biology of the disease to a more aggressive phenotype • do not see expected change in OS • Bev is less effective and/or less frequently used in patients previously exposed to bev • do not see expected change in OS • Bev alters our ability to detect an existing recurrence until later since CT relies on differences in vascularity & permeability • wouldnot expect a change in OS
Conclusions • Time varying effect of Bev on recurrence is still evident with 56 mos F/U • Bev delays recurrence and may interfere with relapse detection during treatment, but does not prevent recurrence • No evidence in C-08 for a negative impact of Bev exposure on DFS, time to recurrence, OS, or CC specific survival • Our data further call into question our traditional paradigm of adjuvant colon drug development & support the need for new testing platforms in patients with minimal disease e.g. Stage 4 NED
Special Thank You • NSABP investigators • Our patients • NSABP Ops office • Clinical trials nurses and coordinators • NSABP leadership and colleagues • Drs. Wolmark, O’Connell, Yothers & Sharif • Industry & NCI Colleagues • Dr. Meg Mooney