1 / 16

Engineering 100: Bridge Project

Engineering 100: Bridge Project. Group 6 ( Team Bacardi ) Jon Honari, Kevin Lam, Otis Chantharangsy, Ivee Ilao. Design Ideas Prototype Bridge Process Testing/Results Prototype Analysis Flaws Improvements . Final Bridge Design Testing/results Final Results Graph Analysis Failures

arwen
Download Presentation

Engineering 100: Bridge Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Engineering 100:Bridge Project Group 6 (Team Bacardi) Jon Honari, Kevin Lam, Otis Chantharangsy, Ivee Ilao

  2. Design Ideas Prototype Bridge Process Testing/Results Prototype Analysis Flaws Improvements Final Bridge Design Testing/results Final Results Graph Analysis Failures Conclusion Presentation Outline

  3. Design • Arch Design • Proved to be strongest structure based on our research • Base • Flat and straight • Supports • Angle supports • Evenly distributed force

  4. Prototype Design

  5. Prototype Process • Arch • Supports • Road • Connections • Structural Reinforcements

  6. Prototype Process

  7. Prototype Testing/Results

  8. Prototype Analysis • Flaws • Uneven weight distribution • Not supported where bridge met jig • Ultimate reason for failure • Weak road • Sloppy design • Unnecessary weight

  9. Prototype Flaws Red: Excess Weight Green: Lack of Support

  10. Final Design • Excess weight was removed • Top section was more reinforced • Used wood glue instead of hot glue for the majority • Made sure weight was distributed evenly • Reinforced the legs where the bridge met the jig • Added more supports

  11. Final Bridge Prototype Prototype vs. Final Design

  12. Final Design (Completed)

  13. Final Testing/Results

  14. Final Design Failure Important joints were overlooked and were not supported correctly

  15. Final Analysis • Overall, very good improvement • Bridge weighed 0.59 lbs • Bridge held 531.89 lbs • Performance = Successful • With more supports in the correct places we believe the bridge could hold much more weight

  16. We conclude… • Spending more time on the construction yielded better results • About 170% improvement • High efficiency ratio • Endures a high amount of pressure • Lasts under consistent amount of low pressure • First Bridge: .56 pounds, held 296.00 lb • Final Bridge: .59 pounds, held 531.89 lb

More Related