740 likes | 931 Views
Marshall Breeding Independent Consult, Author, Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides http://www.librarytechnology.org/ http://twitter.com/mbreeding. Harnessing Tech to Support Library Strategies . 運用科技支援圖書館的策略任務和服務. 12 May 2013. HKU Library Leadership Institute.
E N D
Marshall Breeding Independent Consult, Author, Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides http://www.librarytechnology.org/ http://twitter.com/mbreeding Harnessing Tech to Support Library Strategies 運用科技支援圖書館的策略任務和服務 12 May 2013 HKU Library Leadership Institute
AppropriateAutomation Infrastructure • Current automation products out of step with current realities • Majority of library collection funds spent on electronic content • Majority of automation efforts support print activities • New discovery solutions help with access to e-content • Management of e-content continues with inadequate supporting infrastructure
The Legacy Library • Physical collections: Print, microfilm, manuscripts • Scholarly publishing dominated by commercial publishers, societies, etc. (No open access) • Library Services focus on access to physical items based on citations and bibliographic records • The Online Catalog dominates as the primary search tool for books • Print indexes for finding articles
Key Context: Technologies in transition • Client / Server > Web-based computing • Beyond Web 2.0 • Integration of social computing into core infrastructure • Local computing shifting to cloud platforms • Application Service Provider offerings standard • New expectations for multi-tenant software-as-a-service • Full spectrum of devices • full-scale / net book / tablet / mobile • Mobile the current focus, but is only one example of device and interface cycles
Key Context: Libraries in Transition • Academic Shift from Print > Electronic • E-journal transition largely complete • Circulation of print collections slowing • E-books now in play (consultation > reading) • All libraries: • Need better tools for access to complex multi-format collections • Strong emphasis on digitizing local collections • Demands for enterprise integration and interoperability
Key Context: Each type of library faces unique challenges • Academic: Emphasis on subscribed electronic resources • Public: Engaged in the management of print collections • Dramatic increase in interest in E-books • School: Age-appropriate resources (print and Web), textbook and media management • Special: Enterprise knowledge management (Corporate, Law, Medical, etc.)
Key Text: Changed expectations in metadata management • Moving away from individual record-by-record creation • Life cycle of metadata • Metadata follows the supply chain, improved and enhanced along the way as needed • Manage metadata in bulk when possible • E-book collections • Highly shared metadata • E-journal knowledge bases, e.g. • Great interest in moving toward semantic web and open linked data • Very little progress in linked data for operational systems • AACR2 > RDA • MARC > Bibframe (http://bibframe.org/)
Reshaped collections • Journals now published and delivered electronically • Monographs: transition to e-books underway • Demand for e-book discovery and lending • Digital collections: local libraries and cultural organizations actively involved in digitizing unique materials • Media collections: LP, CD, DVD, Blu-Ray to streaming • Heritage print collections will remain indefinitely
Cumulative effect • Library collections more complex than ever • Library services move diverse • Managing electronic and digital content harder than managing print
Many previous assumptions no longer apply Technology platforms scale infinitely No technical limits on how libraries share technical infrastructure Cloud technologies enable new ways of sharing metadata Build flexible systems not hardwired to any given set of workflows Reassess expectations of Technology
ILS model shaped library organizations New Library Services Platforms may enable new ways to organize how resource management and service delivery are performed New technologies more able to support strategic priorities and initiatives Reassess workflow and organizational options
Social Computing • Web 2.0 as a separate activity largely a distraction • Important to have social orientation built directly into the software and services that comprise library infrastructure • Avoid jettisoning patrons out of the library’s Web presence • Find ways to effectively connect with users, connect users to each other, and especially to connect users to library content and services
Academic Library Issues • Greater concern with electronic scholarly articles • Management: Need for consolidated approach that balances print, digital, and electronic workflows • Access: discovery interfaces that maximize the value of investments in subscriptions to scholarly articles and research materials
Public Library Issues • Greater concern for e-books and general article databases • Management: Need for consolidated approach that balances print, digital, and electronic workflows • Emphasis on technologies that engage users with library programs and services
Competing Models of Library Automation • Traditional Proprietary Commercial ILS • Aleph, Voyager, Millennium, Symphony, Polaris • BOOK-IT, DDELibra, Libra.se, Open Galaxy • LIBERO, Amlib, Spydus, NCS • Traditional Open Source ILS • Evergreen, Koha • New generation Library Services Platforms • Ex Libris Alma • Kuali OLE (Enterprise, not cloud) • OCLC WorldShare Management Services, • Serials Solutions Intota • Innovative Interfaces Sierra (evolving)
Convergence • Discovery and Management solutions will increasingly be implemented as matched sets • Ex Libris: Primo / Alma • Serials Solutions: Summon / Intota • OCLC: WorldCat Local / WorldShare Platform • Except: Kuali OLE, EBSCO Discovery Service • Both depend on an ecosystem of interrelated knowledge bases • API’s exposed to mix and match, but efficiencies and synergies are lost
Digital dominant libraries in sight • All new content acquired in electronic formats • E-Journals, E-books: all acquired and accessed electronically • Legacy collections fully digitized • Full digitization of local specialized collections
Many previous assumptions no longer apply Technology platforms scale infinitely No technical limits on how libraries share technical infrastructure Cloud technologies enable new ways of sharing metadata Build flexible systems not hardwired to any given set of workflows Reassess expectations of Technology
ILS model shaped library organizations New Library Services Platforms may enable new ways to organize how resource management and service delivery are performed New technologies more able to support strategic priorities and initiatives Reassess workflow and organizational options
Transition to new technology models just underway More transformative development than in previous phases of library automation Opportunities to partner and collaborate Vendors want to create systems with long-term value Question previously held assumptions regarding the shape of technology infrastructure and services Provide leadership in defining expectations Time to engage
Libraries as agents of content procurement and distribution • Content may be decreasingly accessed through traditional library channels • Content disseminated throughout the institutional enterprise information infrastructure • Learning Management Systems • Departmental or disciplinary research portals • Academic institutions continue to require specialists to procure content on behalf of teaching and research faculty
Digital Impact on content production • A given that new content will be done digitally from start to finish • More dimensions of research process exposed • Publishing models: pressure mounting toward open access • Selection: New dynamics in peer review and subsequently promotion and tenure
Research data • Research Data increasingly within scope • NSF data management plans • Need to organize and preserve • Re-use and repurpose
The <r>evolution of academic information • Library collections should be built from the universe of academic and scholarly content that supports research an teaching • Transition from Print only > Print + electronic + digital + ??? (new media forms) • Cumulative. Additive
The Legacy Library • Physical collections: Print, microfilm, manuscripts • Scholarly publishing dominated by commercial publishers, societies, etc. (No open access) • Library Services focus on access to physical items based on citations and bibliographic records • The Online Catalog dominates as the primary search tool for books • Print indexes for finding articles
Strategic Cooperation • Shared infrastructure in support of strategic collaborative relationships • Opportunities to share infrastructure • Examples: • 2CUL • Orbis Cascade Alliance • Opportunities to reconsider automation implementation strategies • One library = 1 ILS? • Ability to share infrastructure across organizational boundaries?
Time to Invest in Technology • Libraries in general lack the proper tools to manage and deliver access to their reshaped collections • Library and campus tools may seem stilted and primitive relative to what students experience outside the campus domain • Tradition of under-investment and deferred maintenance or replacements of technology infrastructure in the library • Dearth of transformative technology options?
Centers of Preservation • Increased involvement in production of digital content demands institutional commitment to long-term digital preservation • Digital Curation: create, organize, access, preservation • Libraries as a whole in the early stages of digital preservation
Strategic interest in Resource Sharing • Supplement local collections • Provide expanded universe of content to library users • Print – Digital – Electronic • Lower operational Costs • Step into more powerful automation environment
Resource Sharing issues • Local Control and Branding • Compromises to policies and practices • Impact on collection development • Targeted collections among partners • Opportunities for collaborative operations • Technical Services • Costs for delivery • Reduce traditional ILL costs
Impact on Library Users • Access to larger aggregate collections • Enhanced Discovery: able to gain access to larger universe of content • Convenient delivery of materials • Manage expectations on delivery times
Budget planning • Increased activity comes with cost implications • Buy less, borrow more • Factor in courier costs • Technology costs
Integrated Library System Branch 6 Branch 5 Branch 4 Branch 8 Branch 2 Branch 1 Branch 7 Branch 3 Main Facility Search: Holdings Patrons useCirculation featuresto request itemsfrom other branches Model: Multi-branchIndependentLibrary System Floating Collectionsmay reduce workload for Inter-branchtransfers BibliographicDatabase Library System
WorldCat Resource Sharing Patron has Citation for item not held by Library Branch 7 Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 3 Branch 4 Branch 5 Branch 6 Branch 8 Main Facility Holdings Interlibrary Loan Request Form WorldCat Resource Sharing Request Submission User: ILLiad Password: BibliographicDatabase WorldCat Resource tracking and fulfillment Needed by: Dec 30, 2012 5:00pm Place Request Interlibrary Loan Personnel ILS Synchronization Library System A
Consortial Resource Sharing System Resource Sharing Application Branch 5 Branch 7 Branch 3 Branch 2 Branch 1 Branch 4 Branch 5 Branch 8 Branch 6 Branch 7 Branch 8 Branch 4 Branch 7 Branch 5 Branch 4 Branch 3 Branch 1 Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 6 Branch 3 Branch 6 Branch 8 Branch 2 Branch 6 Branch 7 Branch 8 Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 3 Branch 7 Branch 4 Branch 5 Branch 8 Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 6 Branch 4 Branch 5 Branch 4 Branch 3 Branch 2 Branch 1 Branch 3 Branch 7 Branch 6 Branch 5 Branch 8 Main Facility Main Facility Main Facility Main Facility Main Facility Main Facility Discovery and Request Management Routines Search: NCIP NCIP Holdings Holdings Holdings Holdings Holdings Holdings NCIP NCIP BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase BibliographicDatabase Inter-System Communications NCIP SIP ISO ILL Z39.50 Staff Fulfillment Tools Library System D Library System E Library System A Library System C Library System B Library System F NCIP NCIP
Shared Consortial ILS Library 6 Library 1 Library 8 Library 7 Library 10 Library 4 Library 3 Library 2 Library 9 Library 5 Search: Holdings ILS configured To support Direct consortial Borrowing throughCirculation Module Model: Multipleindependentlibraries in a Consortium Share an ILS BibliographicDatabase Shared Consortia System
Strategic Cooperation and Resource sharing • Efforts on many fronts to cooperate and consolidate • Many regional consortia merging (Example: Illinois Heartland Library System) • State-wide or national implementations • New Zealand: Kōtui, TePuna • Software-as-a-service or “cloud” based implementations • Many libraries share computing infrastructure and data resources
Auckland City Libraries • 7 separatelibrary services merged in2010
Auckland City Libraries • 7 separatelibrary services merged in2010
OhioLink Innovative InterfacesINN-Reach
South Australia SA Public Library Network 140 Public Libraries
Georgia PINES • 275 Libraries • 140 Counties • 9.6 million books • Single Library Card • 43% of population in Georgia
Northern Ireland • Recently consolidated from 4 regional networks into one • 96 branch libraries • 18 mobile libraries • Collections managed through single Axiell OpenGalaxy LMS http://www.ni-libraries.net/
Illinois Heartland Library Consortium • LargestConsortiumin US by Number of Members
Orbis Cascade Alliance • 37 Academic Libraries • Combined enrollment of 258,000 • 9 million titles • 1997: implemented dual INN-Reach systems • Orbis and Cascade consortia merged in 2003 • Moved from INN-Reach to OCLC Navigator / VDX in 2008 • Current strategy to move to shared LMS based on Ex Libris Alma