730 likes | 1.14k Views
Treatments for Methamphetamine-Related Disorders. Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Program, Sacramento, CA Dec 2, 2004 rrawson@mednet.ucla.edu www.uclaisap.org. Speed. It is methamphetamine powder ranging in color from white, yellow, orange, pink, or brown.
E N D
Treatments for Methamphetamine-Related Disorders Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Program, Sacramento, CA Dec 2, 2004 rrawson@mednet.ucla.edu www.uclaisap.org
Speed • It is methamphetamine powder ranging in color from white, yellow, orange, pink, or brown. • Color variations are due to differences in chemicals used to produce it and the expertise of the cooker. • Other names: shabu, crystal, crystal meth, crank, tina, yaba
Ice High purity methamphetamine crystals or coarse powder ranging from translucent to white, sometimes with a green, blue, or pink tinge.
The Language of America’s Meth Users • Crank, meth, crystal, ice: methamphetamine • Cooking: making meth • Slamming: injecting • Rig: hypothermic needle • Run: multiple days of using meth without sleeping • Crash: long period of sleep following a run • Tweaking: going on a long run • Tweaker: chronic meth users • Shadow people: image commonly cited by meth uses in periods of paranoia
The Language of California Meth Cops • User lab: ounce-quality lab for a tweaker’s personal use • Smurfing: buying small quantities of pseudoephedrine at many stores, a tweaker practice • Real nice lab: 10-pound (or larger) superlab operated by Mexican cartels in California • Step on it: dilute meth with an inactive ingredient • Mope: migrant worker hired to operate a superlab • Low crawl: police technique to approach a superlab unseen • Leg bail: what mopes do when surprised by low-crawling cops, to flee
Methamphetamine: A Growing Menace in Rural America • In 1998, rural areas nationwide reported 949 methamphetamine labs. • Last year, 9,385 were reported. • This year, 4,589 rural labs had been reported as of July 26. • Source: El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), U.S. DEA
Groups with High Rates of Meth Use • Women • Residents in Western/Midwestern Rural Areas and Small/Medium Cities • Predominantly Caucasian, Increasing Numbers of Hispanics • Gay Men • Adolescents
Acute MA Psychosis • Extreme Paranoid Ideation • Well Formed Delusions • Hypersensitivity to Environmental Stimuli • Stereotyped Behavior “Tweaking” • Panic, Extreme Fearfulness • High Potential for Violence
Treatment of MA Psychosis • Typical ER Protocol for MA Psychosis: • Haloperidol - 5mg • Or Atypical Anti-psychotic • Clonazepam - 1 mg • Cogentin - 1 mg • Quiet, Dimly Lit Room • Restraints??
MA “Withdrawal” - Depression - Paranoia - Fatigue - Cognitive Impairment - Anxiety - Agitation - Anergia - Confusion • Duration: 2 Days - 2 Weeks
Treatment of MA “Withdrawal” • Hospitalization/Residential Supervision if: • Danger to Self or Others, or, so Cognitively Impaired as to be Incapable of Safely Traveling to and from Clinic • Otherwise Intensive Outpatient Treatment
Treatment of MA “Withdrawal” • Intensive Outpatient Treatment: • No Pharmacotherapy Available • Positive, Reassuring Context • Directive, Behavioral Intervention • Educate Regarding Time Course of Symptom Remission • Recommend Sleep and Nutrition • Low Stimulation • Acknowledge Paranoia, Depression
Initiating MA Abstinence • Key Clinical Issues: • Depression • Cognitive Impairment • Continuing Paranoia • Anhedonia • Behavioral/Functional Impairment • Hypersexuality • Conditioned Cues • Irritability/Violence
Initiating MA Abstinence • Key Elements of Treatment: • Structure • Information in Understandable Form • Family Support • Positive Reinforcement • 12-Step Participation • No Pharmacologic Agent Currently Available
Treatment of MA Disorders • State of Empirical Evidence: • No Information on TC or “Minnesota Model” Approaches • No Pharmacotherapy with Demonstrated Efficacy • Bupropion, Selegline, Topirimate under Investigation • Ondansetron, Prozac, Zoloft, Flupentixol, Despiramine found not to be useful • Results of Cocaine Treatment Research Extrapolated to MA Treatment • Results with CM, CBT, and Matrix Equivalent with Cocaine and Meth Users
Treatments for Stimulant-Use Disorders with Empirical Support • Motivational Interviewing • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) • Contingency Management • 12-Step Facilitation • Matrix Model
Early Recovery Issues Engaging and Retaining Motivational Interviewing Elicit behavior change Respect autonomy Tolerate patient ambivalence Explore consequences
Precontemplation Contemplation Maintenance Preparation Action Stages of ChangeProchaska & DiClemente
Affirmations • Patient-focused • Intended to: • Support patient’s involvement • Encourage continued attendance • Assist patient in seeing positives • Support patient’s strengths
Social Learning Theory (Relapse Prevention Marlatt & Gordon, 1995) Operant Conditioning (Positive Reinforcement) Modeling Classical Conditioning (Paired Stimuli) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy(CBT) Goals To use learning processes to help individuals reduce drug use To help patients: • Recognize Situations • Avoid Situations • Cope with Problems and Behaviors
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy • Basic Assumptions: • Drug/Alcohol use is learned behavior. • No assumption of underlying psychopathology • Classical and operant conditioning factors involved • “Treatment” is a process of teaching, coaching and reinforcing. • New, alternative behaviors must be established. • Therapist is teacher, coach, and source of positive reinforcement. • Can be delivered in group or individual setting
Vouchers Inexpensive Gifts Take-home Access to Housing Methadone Doses Access to Work Therapy Gold Stars Contingency Management with Vouchers
Contingency Management • Basic Assumptions: • Drug and alcohol use behavior can be controlled using operant reinforcement procedures. • Vouchers can be used as proxy’s for money or goods. • Vouchers should be redeemed for items incompatible with drug use. • Escalating the value of the voucher for consecutive weeks of abstinence promotes better performance. • Counseling/therapy may or may not be required in conjunction with CM procedure.
Contingency Management • Key concepts: • Behavior to be modified must be objectively measured. • Behavior to be modified (e.g., urine test results) must be monitored frequently. • Reinforcement must be immediate. • Penalties for unsuccessful behavior (e.g., positive Ua) can reduce voucher amount. • Vouchers may be applied to a wide range of prosocial alternative behaviors .
A Multi-Site Comparison of Psychosocial Approaches for the Treatment of Methamphetamine DependenceThe Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors*Addiction (June, 2004)
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Program components based upon scientific literature on promotion of behavior change. • Program elements and schedule selected based on empirical support in literature and application. • Program focus is on current behavior change in the present and not underlying “causes” or presumed “psychopathology”. • Matrix “treatment” is a process of “coaching”, educating, supporting and reinforcing positive behavior change.
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Non-judgmental, non-confrontational relationship between therapist and patient creates positive bond which promotes program participation. • Therapist as a “coach” • Positive reinforcement used extensively to promote treatment engagement and retention. • Verbal praise, group support and encouragement other incentives and reinforcers.
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Accurate, understandable, scientific information used to educate patient and family members • Effects of drugs and alcohol • Addiction as a “brain disease” • Critical issues in “recovering” from addiction
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Behavioral strategies used to promote cessation of drug use and behavior change • Scheduling time to create “structure” • Educating and reinforcing abstinence from all drugs and alcohol • Promoting and reinforcing participation in non- drug-related activities
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Cognitive-Behavioral strategies used to promote cessation of drug use and prevention of relapse. • Teaching the avoidance of “high risk” situations • Educating about “triggers” and “craving” • Training in “thought stopping” technique • Teaching about the “abstinence violation effect” • Reinforcing application of principles with verbal praise by therapist and peers
Matrix Model ofOutpatient Treatment Organizing Principles of Matrix Treatment • Involvement of family members to support recovery. • Encourage participation in self-help meetings • Urine testing to monitor drug use and reinforce abstinence • Social support activities to maintain abstinence
Primary Measures to Build the Model • Retention, Retention, Retention • Drug-free UA’s
Matrix ModelAn Integrated, Empirically-based, Manualized Treatment Program
Elements of the Matrix Model • Engagement/Retention • Structure • Information • Relapse Prevention • Family Involvement • Self Help Involvement • Urinalysis/Breath Testing
The CSAT Methamphetamine Treatment Project
Project Goals: • To study the clinical effectiveness of the Matrix Model • To compare the effectiveness of the Matrix model to other locally available outpatient treatments • To establish the cost and cost effectiveness of the Matrix model compared to other outpatient treatments • To explore the replicability of the Matrix model and challenges involved in technology transfer
Matrix Vs Treatment as Usual: Study Design • 8 sites • Participants randomly assigned to Matrix Model treatment or Treatment as Usual in each site. • Dependent Measures: Retention in treatment; urinalysis results; self report of meth use; ASI scores (in Rx, at D/C and FU
The Matrix Model • Urine or breath alcohol tests once per week, weeks 1-16
Days Paid for Work in Past 30 Possible is 0-30; tpaired=6.01; p-value<0.000 (highly sig.)
Total Income (Past 30 days) of Participants tpaired=2.34; p-value=0.02 (sig.)
ASI Composite Scores Possible is 0-1; Higher : worse problem tpaired: *p-value<0.03 (sig.), **p-value<0.000 (highly sig.)