1.33k likes | 2.63k Views
Culture Theory. May 2008. Chapter 2. Culture Theory (CT) Chapter 2. Impact on Safety Risk View Interaction with other Groups World View. Cultural Theory. Mary Douglas Anthropologist Observation of Societies Threats Social Structures Ways of Life Attitudes. Culture.
E N D
Culture Theory May 2008 Chapter 2
Culture Theory (CT)Chapter 2 • Impact on Safety • Risk View • Interaction with other Groups • World View
Cultural Theory • Mary Douglas • Anthropologist • Observation of Societies • Threats • Social Structures • Ways of Life • Attitudes
Culture • Studied Life and Cultural Biases • Functional Explanation • Social Biases • Argued two principle axes: • Grid and Group
Cultural Theory • Group: Degree of division between insiders and outsiders • Grid: (Regulation) Rules that relate one individual to another Regulation Group
Examples • Strong Grid /Strong Group (High) • Individuals Regulated for the sake of the group. • Heirarchist
Views of Nature • Fragile • Robust • Capricious (Erratic, impulsive, unpredictable)
Strong Grid, Strong Group • Roles are subscribed – gender and birth • Positional Rules • Groups are within larger groups Bernstein: Two family Examples: Modern Japanese British Middle-class Family
Hierarchist • Social Sectors: Classes, castes, age groups • Specialized Roles • Larger and lasts longer • Less internal conflict • Well defined rules • Experts • Reliance on rules Regulation Tolerant within limits Group
Individuals • Group (Low) Grid/Regulation (Low) • Individuals than group • Lack of group mentality • Social classes negotiable • Transaction and transfer freely • Political laws to regulate individuals • Trial and error
Egalitarian • High Group, Low Grid • Strong bond • Voluntary Associations • Good of Group before individual • Sensitive to high consequence risk • Nature Fragile • Small change will bring crashing down
Random! Isolationist (fatalist) • High Reg, Low group • Feel isolated • Nature as random • Little they can do • No respect for other groups
Hermit (Autonomous) • Medium/Medium • Withdraws from social interaction • Autonomous • Often ignored
Nature Views Random! Tolerant within limits Fragile Stable
Risk • Different Levels of Risk Views • Risk Adverse • Risk Procedures (Regulation) • Risk Takers • Risk Acceptors
Risk • Culture Theory can be used to predict risk responses • Risk Issues • Grid Coordinates
Risk Acceptances Risk Adverse Risk Risk Procedures Risk Taker
Nature Capricious Nature Fragile Nature Robust
View points Fatalist Share Adverse
No respect Accept authority Glorify risk/acceptance High Fatalist Risk adverse High bond Robust ISO. Hier. Nature capricious Deride safety culture No respect for other groups thoughts elude other groups Regulation Hermit Nature Reject hier. knowledge Risk Nature Robust Trend setters Indiv. Egal. Competition Nature Fragile Low Risk Takers Weak leadership Low High Risk Adversion Group
Grid • Coarse Grained • Static • Rests on hidden assumptions • No Accounting for change
Mountain Utilities wants to construct a 300 Megawatt Reactor in Gentle Valley to supply the electrical needs of the community. This community of people has Grown to over 400,000 strong. Up to this point, the community has relied on other Power generating systems for their needs. If this was a hierarchal community, what would you expect would be their expectations? Concerns? Worries? Grid Exercise
The thriving metropolis of Getter Done is made up mostly of Engineers And PhDs. They have worked together for near 20 years in all kinds of Endeavors. An overseas company in conjunction with the NASA want to Establish a new antimatter storage and transfer system to support a new space Craft. The facility will store 100 cubic meters (100 m3) of antimatter in pods Constructed of polyduranium. The leak rate of the tank is expected To be only <0.0002 kg/day. How will the community respond? Grid Exercise #2
Cultural Theory Grid • Uses: • Predict Risk Behavior? • Individual Behavior? • How they are in cultural roles
Our Organizations • Location on the Grid • Definitions – what does that mean? • Discussion.
Other Characteristics • Individual Characteristics • Gender • Race • Political Ideology • Personality Type
Biases • Superiority of any Group? • Limitations of the Groups • Accuracy of the Group • Each as a one view?
One View HH Servants Military Japan India U.S? Communal Sect Leaders
Canadian Website • Safety Management Systems • Models • Related to Grid? • View on Risk?
Risk Models Complexity 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Space Nuclear Energy Marine Transport Coupling Abandon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dams Restrict DNA Research Tolerate & Improve Mining Flying
Nanotechnology • Carcinogenic Effects • Long Term effects – Unknown • Quantum Dots • Single-wall Nanotubes • MSDSs • Focus on materials not product
Safety & Health Aspects of Nanotechnology From EPA White Paper on Nanotechnology
Safety & Health Aspects of Nanotechnology Where are We? ESH Coverage 3rd Gen 4th Gen Nanotechnology 2nd Generation 2015 2006 2001 2003
Relationships • Related to Grid • Accountability: High /High • Training: High • Threat - View of nature and risk