1 / 17

Public Education Funding

Public Education Funding. By Ted Lewis and David Marino. By Ted Lewis and David Marino. Overview of Education Funding. Public schools funded by local property taxes Managed at the district level. Arguments For Equitable Funding.

ashley
Download Presentation

Public Education Funding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Education Funding By Ted Lewis and David Marino By Ted Lewis and David Marino

  2. Overview of Education Funding • Public schools funded by local property taxes • Managed at the district level

  3. Arguments For Equitable Funding • Lower income school districts would receive more money (Funding gap 2005) • True equity of opportunity • The quality of the average education would increase

  4. Arguments against Equitable Funding • Taxes paid should go to the districts those people live in • If money is equally distributed, the highest quality schools would lose quality

  5. No Child Left Behind • Passed in 2001 • Sets academic standards for schools, measured by standardized tests • Incentives for school that meet requirements • Schools required to provide for students when standards not met

  6. Pros/Cons of NCLB Pros cons Less funding for struggling schools Does not provide funding to carry out the bills provisions Federal intrusion into a “state issue” • Encourages schools to improve and perform well • Sets national standards for educational quality • Requires lagging schools to reach standards

  7. Race to the Top • Part of American Recovery and Reinvestment act of 2009 • Sets criteria to measure improvement in education quality • Offers additional funding to states that can display a significant improvement

  8. Pros/cons of Race to the Top Pros Cons Not all states are eligible for the extra funding (opt-in) Does not focus on improving low achieving schools Does not require schools to increase performance • Sets comprehensive list of requirements for improvement • Sets incentives for improvement • Cannot lose funding if standards are not met

  9. Interest Groups • KNEA (Kansas National Education Association) • Increased investment in public education • Adequate funding for all public schools

  10. Interest Groups • The Heritage Foundation • Returning education authority to the states • Belief that steps to equity of education will lead to mediocre education

  11. Statistics • The U.S. spent $562.3 billion in the 2006-2007 school year. (NECS) • In the 2006-07 school year, the government spent $10,041 per student on average (NECS)

  12. Statistics In the long term, Reading and Mathematics scores have increased over the past 30 years.

  13. Recent Developments • The start of the Race to the Top Program (July 24, 2009) • Phase 2 decisions announced on August 24, 2010

  14. Republican Party Positions • High Standards • Giving Parents the option to choose schools

  15. Democratic Party Positions • Democrats cite Race to the Top as their position on education

  16. Green Party Opinion • The Green Party supports choice in the type of education • Green Party supports an equitable distribution of state and national funding

  17. Works Cited • Works Cited • "Current Political Issues | RNC: Republican National Committee | GOP." RNC: Republican National Committee | RNC: Republican National Committee | GOP. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.gop.com/index.php/issues/issues/>. • "DPI Seeks Changes to Public School Funding - JSOnline." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Breaking News, Sports, Business, Watchdog Journalism, Multimedia in Wisconsin. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/108059204.html>. • "Education | The Heritage Foundation." Conservative Policy Research and Analysis | The Heritage Foundation. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.heritage.org/Issues/Education>. • "Education Reform | The Heritage Foundation." Conservative Policy Research and Analysis | The Heritage Foundation. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/08/education-reform>. • "Full Rank." Philly Mag. Philadelphia Magazine. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.phillymag.com/files/images/Full_ranking.pdf>. • "Green Party on Education." OnTheIssues.org - Candidates on the Issues. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/green_party_education.htm>. • "Inequality in Funding of Public Education Raises Justice Issues: Quality Often Depends on Where Students Live - Cover Story - Page 2 | National Catholic Reporter." Find Articles at BNET | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_n26_v33/ai_19389741/pg_2/?tag=content;col1>. • "Obama Offers 'Race to the Top' Contest for Schools | World News | Guardian.co.uk." Latest News, Comment and Reviews from the Guardian | Guardian.co.uk. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/8625198?FORM=ZZNR7>. • "School Funding Central Menu." KNEA Tools. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.knea.org/funding/archive.html>. • Subject, By. "Archived: Executive Summary of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001." U.S. Department of Education. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html>. • Subject, By. "The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)." U.S. Department of Education. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html>. • United States. US Department of Education. Www2,ed,gov. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf>. • "What We Stand For: Education." Democrats.org. Web. 17 Nov. 2010. <http://www.democrats.org/issues/education>. • "The Funding Gap 2005." The Education Trust, 2005. Web. 18 Nov. 2010. <"The Funding Gap 2005." The Education Trust, 2005. Web. 18 Nov. 2010.>.

More Related