250 likes | 262 Views
Explore the future of seismic interpretation and the advancements in automatic horizon picking and fault extraction. Learn about the potential of computer-assisted seismic stratigraphy and the role of geologists in interpretation.
E N D
Intelligent Interpretation: From Here to Where? Dr. Bradley Wallet
What is the Future for Seismic Interpreters? Dr. Bradley Wallet
Is it this? Belay that order!
Automatic horizon picking • Widely accepted and available • Relatively stable and mature technology • Works with supervision
Significant steps forward • Consistent dip (Petrel) – Provides consistent paths for horizon tracking using dip • Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation System (Opendtect) – Offers a fully automatic option for horizon tracking in a volume
Automatic fault extraction • Wide spread availability • Not widely used • Reliability is highly variable • Requires careful attribute tuning • Requires careful qc • Adding missing faults • Removing spurious faults • Combining fault patches
Example Processes Median Filter Structural SeismicConditioning Smoothing Original Gaussian Seismic Spatial filter Bandpass filtering Chaos EdgeDetection Variance Dip Deviation EdgeEnhancement ManualInterpretation Ant - Track Fault Filter Volume SpatialFiltering Auto-trackInterpretation PostConditioning Thinning Fault Patches Edit Extracted Faults Fault Volume (Visual Filtering) Fault Interpretation AFE in Petrel
0.0 divergent divergent convergent t (s) convergent 1.5 Geometric attributes: tools for 3D seismic stratigraphy (Barnes, 2002)
high amplitude continuous high amplitude semicontinuous moderate amplitude continuous moderate amplitude semicontinuous low amplitude continuous low amplitude semicontinuous transparent Towards computer-assisted seismic stratigraphy • Select zones of geologic interest for training 2. Choose attributes that differentiate these zones 3. Train a neural network to imitate an interpreter 4. Generate a seismic facies map (West et al., 2002)
Towards computer-assisted 3D seismic stratigraphy coherence 3D seismic facies Geologic Interpretation (West et al., 2002)
Amplitude Similarity + 1 Unsupervised learning (clustering) Opacity Opacity (a) 2D histogram N 1.8 0 5 km − 0.3 100% 100% Time (s) SOM latent axis 2 2.1 (b) 1.7 (a) SOM latent axis 1 Time (s) 2D colorbar (b) 2.0 SOM latent axis 2 (d) 1.7 0 (c) Time (s) SOM latent axis 1 (c) 1.8 2.0 (e) (d) (f) Time (s) Inline 2.1 Z-scale=1:5 Crossline (f) (e) 1.7 1.7 Time (s) Time (s) Horizon A 2.0 2.0
Where are we? • Focused on individual data sets • Crafted and user intensive • Extends the efficiency of the interpreter • Dependent upon the skill of the interpreter • Allows the interpreter to quickly interpret in 3D
How far can we go? • Multi-data set learning is possible • Object based learning is on the horizon • Completely map the facies in the data set
What’s probably too far? • Computer can interpret the seismic • Human will still need to interpret the interpretation
Let us hope Belay that order!
But… We are increasingly removing the geophysics from interpretation of seismic. At this point, will a geologist be more qualified to do the interpretation than a geophysicist?