1 / 29

A Photo Elicitation of Systemic Perception

A Photo Elicitation of Systemic Perception. Rachel Jones, Aalto University, Helsinki rachelcornerJones@gmail.com Jim Corner, Waikato University, New Zealand. Introduction. Professor Jim Corner. Professor Esa Saarinen. Professor Raimo P. Hämäläinen. Existing Approaches to Systems.

asis
Download Presentation

A Photo Elicitation of Systemic Perception

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Photo Elicitation of Systemic Perception Rachel Jones, Aalto University, Helsinki rachelcornerJones@gmail.com Jim Corner, Waikato University, New Zealand

  2. Introduction Professor Jim Corner Professor Esa Saarinen Professor Raimo P. Hämäläinen

  3. Existing Approaches to Systems • Systems Dynamics = external conceptualization of systems, modeling • Soft Systems Methodology = internal conceptualization of systems, problem-solving • Systems Intelligence = co-evolving with systems, living well Perceiving systems important to all the approaches.

  4. Motivation to explore photo elicitation (1) • Extensive systems literature, however… • Average person unable to: • articulate their understanding of systems • apply systems thinking formally (Dawidowicz, 2012) • Systems awareness/thinking is important; needs to be applied more often (Goekler, 2003; Stowell, 2007; Colbert et al., 2011) • Systems community needs fresh approaches

  5. Motivation to explore photo elicitation (2) • Systems Intelligence (SI) accounts for the human capacity to act intelligently in systems (Hämäläinen, R. P, & Saarinen, E., 2006) • Systemic perception a key dimension of SI • SI theoretically explored but needs tools that place the actor in the system

  6. Our study • Method: • Exploratory, qualitative, photos, thematic analysis. • 15 university students at Aalto University, Helsinki. • Data collection: • Each take 10 photos of important systems in their lives. • Write for each - why this, what system does each photo represent? • Six weeks later…overall reflection on this photo process.

  7. Research questions • What systems do people perceive? • What key aspects of systems are present (and absent)? • How does thinking about systems effect/affect their understanding? • What value, if any, does photo elicitation have for engaging with systems?

  8. Photo elicitation as a method Mix (Petersen and Ostergaard, 2004)

  9. Sample Photos

  10. Findings – Theme, Type, Within Participants

  11. Findings – systems concepts discussed

  12. Findings • Initial data: • Did not initially understand what a system is • Most did not automatically consider themselves to be part of the systems • Immediate environments ruled (people and places) • Dynamics often not considered • Photos caused some anxiety • From Reflections: • Photo + reflection made them think more deeply about: • Interconnections, complexity, decomposition, boundaries, emergence • Their own role • The “real systems in one’s life” • Not easy to capture the concept of system in a photo • Start to see how “things” interact with and impact upon people • More aware of systems now • Interesting way to introduce systems, active engagement with the term

  13. Participant reflections on process “I think this was a very useful and interesting exercise...I think it is great to stop for a moment in your life and evaluate it from different perspectives. This made me to see myself from many angles…”

  14. Participant reflections on process “Somehow, putting them on a piece of paper facilitates the observation of behavior and identification of improvement opportunities….could I copy this pattern in this particular system to others?”

  15. Participant reflections on process “When I now see some systems-like structures or mechanisms, I’m more likely to identify them that way than what I was couple of months ago.”

  16. Conclusions • Systems: • Awareness of systems is generally low • People still see systems – just don’t know it • Use of systems concepts under-developed • Systems education is possible • Photo elicitation as method: • Makes the familiar unfamiliar • Photo expands their thinking • Brings subjectivity to the systems world • Interviews would be useful • Great potential for raising systemic perception and awareness of SI through photos

  17. References • Colbert, C. Y., Ogden, P. E., Ownby, A. R., and Bowe, C. (2011. Systems-based practice in graduate medical education: Systems thinking as the missing foundational construct, teaching and learning. Medicine: An International Journal, 23(2), 179-185. • Dawidowicz, P. (2012). The person on the street's understanding of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(1), 2-13. • Goekler, J. (2003). Teaching for the future: Systems thinking and sustainability. Green Teacher, 70, 8-14. • Hämäläinen, R. P, & Saarinen, E. (2006). Systems intelligence: A key competence for organizational life. Reflections: The SoL Journal, 7(4),17–28. • Petersen, N. J., & Østergaard, S. (2004, August). Organisational photography as research method: What, how and why. Paper presented at the Research Methods Division, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. • Stowell, F. (2007). The knowledge age or the age of ignorance and the decline of freedom? Systemic Practice Action Research, 20, 413-427.

  18. Comments/Questions?

More Related