440 likes | 481 Views
Measurement, Scales and Attitudes. Nominal. Ordinal?. Interval. Ratio. Types of Scales. Nominal - Identification only Ex (players numbers, male=1 female=0) Ordinal -Ranking Ex (grades?) SEI score Interval –Ranks and distinguishes intervals Ex (temperature) Ratio – absolute quantities
E N D
Types of Scales • Nominal - Identification only • Ex (players numbers, male=1 female=0) • Ordinal -Ranking • Ex (grades?) SEI score • Interval –Ranks and distinguishes intervals • Ex (temperature) • Ratio – absolute quantities • Ex (weight, degrees Kelvin)
You Try • Which college is your major housed in? 1. CLS 2. CBA 3. SAH • How much money did you spend on alcohol at the bars in the last 7 days?_____Dollars • Or answer categories 1. $0-10 2. $11-20 3. $21 +
Appropriate Statistical Analysis • Scale matters. • Usually
Index Measures • Conglomerates of questions • Mapping multiple responses to a single metric • Consumer Sentiment Index
Good Measurement • Reliable • Valid • Sensitive
Validity-reliability bulls eye(Babbie, 1998) Both valid & reliable Reliable, but invalid
Reliability • Degree to which measures are free from error
Reliability • Repeatability • Test-Retest method- High correlation suggests stability/reliability
Reliability • Internal Consistency • Split-half method- take results form even questions and compare to odd number questions • Equivalent form- asking different but equivalent questions of a group, and comparing their answers on the separate questions
Validity • the ability to measure that which you intend to measure • Reliability is a necessary condition for validity, not sufficient • Example - if the scale always reads 5 pounds too much. It is reliable, but not a valid measure of weight.
Types of Validity • Content (Face) validity- agreement that a scale accurately measures that which it is intended to • Criterion validity- the ability of a measure to correlate highly with another measure of the same construct • Concurrent validity- measures made concurrently • Predictive validity- correlates with future measure • Construct validity- The ability of a measure to confirm a network of related hypothesis
Types of Validity • Content (Face) validity- agreement that a scale accurately measures that which it is intended to
Types of Validity • Criterion validity- the ability of a measure to correlate highly with another measure of the same construct • Concurrent validity- measures made concurrently • Predictive validity- correlates with future measure
Types of Validity • Construct validity- The ability of a measure to confirm a network of related hypothesis
Sensitivity • a measurements ability to measure variability in stimuli • Without variability in response we have nothing of interest. • We can classify but not understand or explain
Attitude Measurement • Attitude – an enduring disposition which contains these components: • Affective (emotional) • Cognitive (reason) • Behavioral (action) • Example (sexual identity) • Hypothetical Construct
Male Sex Behavior and Identification Col1 exclusively male Col 2 both Col 3 exclusively female
Female Sex Behavior and Identification Col1 exclusively male Col 2 both Col 3 exclusively female
Practice Problems • Drinking Alcohol • Religion • Music
Concept Measurement • Awareness:measure of knowledge; understanding; familiarity • Behavior:measure of actions/choices that took place • Motivation:measure of why people behave as they do • Opinion:measure of belief or attitude • Preference:measure of likes/dislikes • Desire:measure of wants • Interest:measure of concerns/curiosities • Intention:measure of anticipated behavior • Demographic:measure of respondent’s characteristics • Perceptions of above?
Methods of Measuring Attitudes • Rating • Likert Scale – carefully constructed attitudinal measure which asks people for their agreement with a statement • Example: Please rate each of the following, on a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 being least important and 10 being most important…
Methods of Measuring Attitudes • Ranking • Rank choices from most important to least important • Example: Of the following 10 items please rank them in order of importance, with 1 being least important and 10 being most important.
Source: http://blog.vovici.com/blog/bid/18228/Ranking-Questions-vs-Rating-Questions
Sorting • Asks respondents to sort items/names into groups
Multiple Choice • Provide alternative responses that R might choose.
Monadic • Q. How satisfied are you with your current job? 1. Very Satisfied 2. Somewhat Satisfied 3. Not Very Satisfied
Comparative • Q. Compared to your current job how much responsibility did you have at your last job? • 1. More • 2. About the Same • 3. Less
Balanced Q. How satisfied are you with your current cable service? 1. Very Satisfied 2. Somewhat Satisfied 3. Somewhat unsatisfied 4. Very unsatisfied
Unbalanced Q. How satisfied are you with your current cable service? 1. Very Satisfied 2. Somewhat Satisfied 3. Somewhat unsatisfied
Forced Choice • Does not allow the respondent to offer no opinion, which is different than a neutral opinion
Unforced Choice • Allows respondents to opt out of providing an opinion.
JOHN ALLEN PAULOS Unless we know how things are counted, we don’t know if it’s wise to count on the numbers.
Albert Einstein Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.