240 likes | 441 Views
Characteristics of Practice Rural and Urban General Surgeons in North Carolina. Jennifer King Erin Fraher, MPP, Thomas C. Ricketts, PhD, Anthony Charles, MD, George F. Sheldon, MD, Anthony Meyer, MD PhD. Funding provided by American College of Surgeons Health Policy Institute and NC AHEC.
E N D
Characteristics of PracticeRural and Urban General Surgeonsin North Carolina Jennifer King Erin Fraher, MPP, Thomas C. Ricketts, PhD, Anthony Charles, MD, George F. Sheldon, MD, Anthony Meyer, MD PhD Funding provided by American College of Surgeons Health Policy Institute and NC AHEC
Integrating practice patterns inworkforce analyses • Medical practice varies between individual physicians • Volume • Content • Breadth • Still, many supply assessments rely on head counts • Sometimes adjusted for hours in clinical care
General Surgery • Indications of increasing specialization • Over 70% of general surgeons pursue fellowship training • ABS now offers primary certification in vascular surgery • “Natural” narrowing of practice over career? • Rural practice may be broader • Debate over “right” breadth of training for general surgeons
Research Questions • What is the: • Content of general surgery practices? • Volume of procedures performed? • Breadth of procedures performed? • How much do these characteristics vary from surgeon to surgeon? • How do these practice characteristics vary by rural and urban location?
Data • NC Health Professions Data System, 2004 • Data on all licensed physicians • Specialty, practice location, demographics • NC Inpatient Discharge Database & Ambulatory Surgery Database, 2004 • ICD-9 procedure codes for all discharges and ambulatory surgery encounters • Attending physician UPIN
Methods: Collapse ICD-9 Codes • Clinical Classification Software (CCS) - AHRQ • 231 Procedure Categories, such as: • Cholecystectomy and common duct exploration (CCS 84) • Inguinal and femoral hernia repair (CCS 85) • 4 Procedure Types • Major Therapeutic: Cholecystectomy (ICD-9 5122) • Minor Therapeutic: Skin incision & foreign body removal (ICD-9 8605) • Major Diagnostic: Intraoperative cholangiogram (ICD-9 8753) • Minor Diagnostic: Colonoscopy (ICD-9 4523) • Group CCS Procedure Categories into American Board of Surgery content areas
Methods: Analysis • Descriptive statistics by county type • Core Based Statistical Area designations • Metropolitan: county with an urbanized area with 50,000 or more population • Micropolitan: county with urban cluster of 10,000 to < 50,000 population • Rural • OLS regression to examine rural-urban differences in breadth of practice controlling for individual characteristics
Procedures Performed by CCS Type N=301,294 N=213,176 N=64,263 N=23,855 Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least one procedure in 2004.
Procedures Performed by Content Area N=301,294 N=213,176 N=64,263 N=23,855 Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least one procedure in 2004.
Dr. JonesFictional Surgeon Total Procedures = 511
25% performed < 356 25% performed >700 Variation in Procedure Volume Metro: 25% Micro: 23% Rural: 31% Metro: 24% Micro: 27% Rural: 31% Average = 554 Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least one procedure in 2004.
Dr. JonesFictional Surgeon Total Procedures = 511 Types of Procedures = 30
15% performed < 44 15% performed > 79 Variation in Types of Procedures Performed Metro: 13% Micro: 13% Rural: 31% Metro: 14% Micro: 8% Rural: 7% Average = 61 Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least 50 procedures in 2004.
Dr. JonesFictional Surgeon Total Procedures = 511 Types of Procedures = 30 Share in Top 10 = 406 / 511 = 79%
13% of surgeons were > 80% focused on 10 procedures 15% of surgeons were < 55% focused on 10 procedures Variation in Share of All Procedures Accounted for by Top 10 Procedure Types Metro: 17% Micro: 13% Rural: 0% Metro: 13% Micro: 10% Rural: 14% Average = .67 Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least 50 procedures in 2004.
Some rural-urban differences smaller after controlling for individual characteristics Number of Different Types of Procedures Performed Percent of Total Procedures Performed Accounted For by Top 10 Procedures Source: North Carolina Health Professions Data System and NC Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Discharge Data, 2004. Data include active, in-state, non-federal physicians who report a primary specialty of general surgery and had at least 50 procedures in 2004 (N=517). OLS results control for years since medical school graduation, hours per week in clinical care, gender, and second specialty.
Key Findings • Rural-urban differences in content • Wide variation in volume and breadth between individual surgeons • No large rural-urban differences in breadth • Many urban surgeons have practices as broad or broader than rural counterparts
Limitations • Missing UPIN for some surgeons • Self-reported specialty • No information on board certification • Possible measurement error • If attending surgeon is not performing surgeon • If incorrect ICD-9 codes • Limited information on hospital characteristics
Extensions of Analysis Strategy:Future Work • More detail on differences between rural and urban practice • Effect of formal sub-specialization on scope of practice • Changes in scope of practice over career trajectory