120 likes | 577 Views
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Collateral and International Law Issues Peter Werner ISDA Europe. The Collateral Directive: summary. Effective and simple regime for pledge and title transfer Simplifies creation, perfection and enforcement
E N D
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.Collateral and International Law IssuesPeter WernerISDA Europe
The Collateral Directive: summary • Effective and simple regime for pledge and title transfer • Simplifies creation, perfection and enforcement • Confirms validity of right of use (‘rehypothecation’) • Confirms efficacy of title transfer collateral and close-out netting • Some protection in context of insolvency (stay on enforcement, ‘zero hour’ rules, top-up and substitution) • Clarifies conflict of laws rules
EU Collateral Directive • Collateralisation: Important risk management tool to transfer credit risk into legal, operational and market risk • Containment of legal risk by approved netting and collateral opinions as well as documentation (e.g.ISDA)
EU Collateral Directive Urgent need for collateral law reform (2000 ISDA survey) • Uncertainty regarding the enforceability of title transfer collateral in 7 out of 15 EU member states • Uncertainty regarding the vulnerability of the transfer collateral arrangements against third parties in 6 member states • Uncertainty regarding the treatment of top-up collateral as a preference in 5 member states
EU Collateral Directive: evolution • All financial collateral • Pledge and title transfer agreements covered • Both provider and taker must be either a public authority/central bank or a financial institution under prudential supervision or a legal person of a capital base exceeding €100million
EU Collateral Directive: evolution • Limitation of rules on creation and enforcement • Re-use of pledge? • Recognition of substitution/top-up • Recognition of close-out netting • Recognition of the PRIMA approach • Inclusion of collateralised business between corporates?
EU Collateral Directive: issues and results Creation of a pledge or title transfer requires often formal acts, such as • Filing with an official body • Registration in a public register • Official publication • Result: Creation/validity not dependent on a formal act if: • The financial collateral arrangement provides for dispossession, i.e. the provision of the collateral • The provision of collateral must be evidenced inwriting
Effective June 2002 (2000/47/EC) • Implementation required by end-2003 • Broad range of financial institutions • Central banks (incl. ECB, EIB, IMF) • Public authorities • Central counterparty or clearing house • A person other than a natural person, incl. partnerships, provided the other party is one of the above (BUT: Opt-out) The EU Collateral Directive ISDA
Conflict of laws issues • Proprietary issues generally governed by lex rei sitae • Situs of traditional, directly held securities • Situs of securities held indirectly through securities account with intermediary • Problems of a “look-through” approach • The “place of the relevant intermediary approach” (“PRIMA”)
Measures to introduce PRIMA • Settlement Finality Directive, article 9(2) • Collateral Directive, article 9 • Proposed Hague Convention on Indirectly Held Securities
Hague Convention: current position • June 2002 text produced by Drafting Committee • Regional workshops June/July 2002 • Main outstanding issue relates to identification of PRIMA law – • Option A: law specified in custody agreement • Option B: law of state in which securities account is agreed to be maintained • Diplomatic Conference December 2002
Unidroit initiative • Unidroit study group on harmonized substantive rules for the use of securities held with intermediaries as collateral • Scope under discussion: creation, perfection, pre- and post-insolvency enforcement of collateral arrangements • First session 9 to 13 September 2002 • Next official study group meeting Feb/Mar 03