1 / 8

Development of a new low-threshold Trigger

Development of a new low-threshold Trigger. M. Shayduk, M. Rissi, T. Schweizer, N. Otte, M. Lopez for the MAGIC collaboration Padova, October 8-10, 2008. Analogue sum trigger concept. Signal Clipper. Signal Clipper. Summation of patch of 18 pixels in 24 patches in a ring-shape

aubrey-livingston
Download Presentation

Development of a new low-threshold Trigger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of a new low-threshold Trigger • M. Shayduk, • M. Rissi, T. Schweizer, N. Otte, M. Lopez • for the MAGIC collaboration Padova, October 8-10, 2008

  2. Analogue sum trigger concept Signal Clipper Signal Clipper • Summation of patch of 18 pixels in 24 patchesin a ring-shape • Idea: a) Summing up all single photons increases signal to noise ratio b) Fluctuations of shower larger than Poissonian fluctuations of NSB background • Afterpulse problem: high noise rate • Solution: clipping of signal Single pixel spectrum with afterpulses Analog sum of 18 pixels NSB Σ ... ... Afterpulses Discriminator Threshold at 24-27 PhE Discriminator threshold in PhE Thomas Schweizer, MPI Seminar, October 7, 2008 Clipped at 6-8 PhE

  3. Effect of clipping the signal/Comparison of prototype test and MC Trigger rate distribution vs threshold Sum of 18 pixels NSB Afterpulses Showers

  4. Analogue sum trigger concept • Optimization of the trigger pattern 30 GeV gamma light pool Maximal probability to trigger at ~100m Average Phot.Angle vs Impact Trigger region should be a ring around 0.6deg

  5. Optimization of trigger for lowest threshold Effective area Sum Trigger Effective area [m2] Standard Trigger At 20 GeV: Factor 6 improvement 10 100 GeV - Pulse width of sum signal: 2.5-3.0 ns (Signal/NSB ratio) - Number of pixels in analogue sum: 12-18 pixels - Clipping level (6-8 PhE) - Shape of patches (oriented toward center) - Topology of trigger region (optimal for 10-20 GeV showers) Thomas Schweizer, MPI Seminar, October 7, 2008

  6. Installation in La Palma (October 2007) Nepomuk Otte & Maxim shayduk Thomas Schweizer Michael Rissi

  7. Performance: Comparison standard trigger and sum trigger Event distribution 25 GeV threshold sum trigger 55 GeV threshold standard trigger Thomas Schweizer, MPI Seminar, October 7, 2008

  8. Sum Trigger: Advantages • Low cost + simplicity (20kEuro, 2/3 of price: SMA connectors and cables !) conventional OpAmps: OPA699, OPA695 . • Lowest possible trigger threshold (prove of principle: Crab Pulsar Detection, 16th October, Science ) . • Handles PMTs with rather high afterpulse rate (choose cheaper PMs) . • Very low power consumption (no fast ECL comparators). 200 channels ~100 Watt !!! (5Vx20A) MPI Seminar, October 7, 2008

More Related