70 likes | 311 Views
F.D.R vs. Supreme Court Court Packing. By Cody McKinley. The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937. Legislative initiative proposed by F.D.R Wanted to gain favor on new deal measures that had been struck down and declared unconstitutional It was unveiled on February 5, 1937
E N D
F.D.R vs. Supreme CourtCourt Packing By Cody McKinley
The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 • Legislative initiative proposed by F.D.R • Wanted to gain favor on new deal measures that had been struck down and declared unconstitutional • It was unveiled on February 5, 1937 • And on march 9 1937 was the subject of 1 of his fireside chats • It ultimately failed due to adverse public opinion
About the bill • The provisions adhered to 4 basic principles • The president can add 1 justice for each one that is over the age of 70 years 6 months • Limitations on the # of judges the president could appoint: no more than 6 S.C.J. and no more than 2 on any lower federal court • Lower level judges be able to float around to other courts with busy or backlogged dockets • Lower courts be administered by S.C. through newly created proctors
Public Reaction • The public was split, partly because 1. the supreme court was conflated with the constitution 2. Roosevelt’s personal involvement • In his March 9 fireside chat he stated that the the nation had reached a point where it needed to save the constitution from the supreme court
Critics and Failings of the New Deal By Cody McKinley (again)
Critics • Huey Long- thought it was too generous to corporate interests. • Charles Coughlin- considered Roosevelt a dictator and called new deal communist
Failings • Too slow and cautious to provide fiscal stimulus • Too much public power in private hands • New deal policies disproportionally benefited white men