Download
1 / 12
120 likes | 131 Views
This meeting is focused on benchmarking comprehensive cancer care, discussing objectives, work packages, pilot sites, workplan progress, internal evaluation, and dissemination activities of the project. Stakeholders include European healthcare agencies, professional organizations, and OECI members.
E N D
2nd Bench – Can Core Group Meeting Amsterdam, October 17th 2013 Welcome and introduction Wim.van Harten and Claudio. Lombardo
TODAY FOCUS • Objectives • Workpackages, WP leaders and tasks • Introducing the pilot sites • Role and tasks of the pilot sites • Workplan: progress and upcoming activities • Internal evaluation • Dissemination activities of the project • Plan of next meetings
AGENDA –Morning session 0930-1000Welcome and introduction Wim van Harten and Claudio Lombardo, OECI 1000-1330Benchmark development Wim van Harten, Anke Wind - NKI Benchmark piloting Peter Nagy, Edit Marosi - NIO Budget impact analysis Isabelle Lepage-Nefkens, Joris Van Dijck – PANAXEA LUNCH
AGENDA – Afternoon session 1430-1515Benchmarking Manual Frederique Thonon - IGR 1515-1530Project Management – Focus on Pilot Sites Jonathan Watson - HCN 1530-1600Agreement with PilotSites Peter Nagy, Edit Marosi – NIOGermana Gianquinto – ACC 1600-1615 1^ round Internal Evaluation Jonathan Watson – HCN 1615-1630 Dissemination Germana Gianquinto – ACC
AGENDA – Afternoon session cnt. 1630-1645 Timing of the next meeting Q&A Closingremarks and Action Plan Jonathan Watson - HCN 1645 Close of the CG meeting
Objectives • Benchmarking Comprehensive & InterdisciplinaryCancer Care • Yielding examples of Best Practices • Definition of “Comprehensive” - in a Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI & OECI) - for comprehensive cancer care (as in OECI accreditation)
Why Comprehensiveness • Organisational and technical complexity of cancer care increases. • Integration of research and care (translation from bench to bedside) • Difference among Cancer center and department/unit/tumor service • Geographic differences
WorkPackages • WP1 Coordination - OECI and Health Cluster Net • WP2 Dissemination - Alleanza Contro il Cancro • WP3 Evaluation - OECI and Health Cluster Net • WP4 Benchmark Tool Development - NKI • WP5 Coordination of benchmark in Pilot Sites - NIO • WP6 Budget Impact Analysis - PANAXEA • WP7 Benchmarking Manual - IGR
Pilot Sites • European Cancer Patients Coalition-Brussels, Belgium • National Centre for Tumour Diseases – Heidelberg, Germany • Institut Català de Oncologia – Barcelona, Spain • Institute of Oncology Vilnius University – Vilnius, Lithuania • Istituto Tumori «Giovanni Paolo II» - Bari, Italy • The Greater Poland Cancer Centre Hospital – Poznan, Poland • Helsinki University Central Hospital – Helsinki, Finland • King’s Health Partners Integrated Cancer Centre – London, UK • Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre – Berlin, Germany • Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Porto «Francisco Gentil» – Porto, Portugal • Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori – Milan, Italy • National Institut of Oncology – Budapest, Hungary • Oncology Institute «Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta» – Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Stakeholders • European Agency of healthcare and Consumers • Professional organisations (ESMO, ESO, ECCO) • OECI membership and European Hospitals • AACI • …….
Planning • OECI evaluation work plan M3 • Framework for BIA M6 • Draft Benchmark tool M14 • Pilot on site M17; Final tool M34 • Draft structure Manual M19; online M34 • Improvement action plans M34
