340 likes | 454 Views
Workshop on climatic analysis and mapping for agriculture (14-17 june 2005, Bologna, Italy). The multivariate and multi-regressive techniques in the spatial representation of agrometeorological data for the Piedmont (North-West Italy) areas.
E N D
Workshop on climatic analysis and mapping for agriculture (14-17 june 2005, Bologna, Italy) The multivariate and multi-regressive techniques in the spatial representation of agrometeorological data for the Piedmont (North-West Italy) areas Federico Spanna: Regione Piemonte - Agrometeorological Service federico.spanna@regione.piemonte.it Alberto Rainero: S.I.T. – Alessandria County Council albertorainero@libero.it
Contents • Context, aim, method • Multivariate analysis • Spatial representation
Territorial representation Contoured map showing elevation 50 % mountainous 30 % plain 20 % hill
Distribution of meteorological stations 150 agrometeorological stations (RAM) 300 hydrographic station
Aim Georepresentation of agrometeorological variables as influenced by land morphology
Methodology • Analysis and selection of main morphological informations • Individuation of homogeneous agrometeorological areas (multivariate analysis) • Spatial representation (statistical multiregressive analysis)
Contents • Context, aim, method • Multivariate analysis • Spatial representation
Morphological features:1- agrarian landscape map 3 perceptive levels Scale 1:100.000 Cultivation Agrarian trend
Morphological features: 2 – soil yield 9 classes Scale 1:100.000 Potential soil use for crops
Morphological features: 3 – Corine coverage 44 classes Scale 1:100.000 Actual soil use
Morphological features: 4 - morphology Piedmont Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Scale 1:100.000 Height Slope Exposure Distance from valley bottom
Description of morphological and topological parameters Slope Exposure Height Yield soil use Corine coverage Categorical qualitative table Multivariate analysis Homogeneous areas features Territorial information found
91 typologies 8 cluster (homogeneous areas) Aggregation classes 92 stations
8 areas Objective function
Contents • Context, aim, method • Multivariate analysis • Spatial representation
Homogeneous areas representation Watershed Borough boundaries
Meteo information M Spatial interpolation Algorithm Station cluster Influence territorial area Morphological parameters Morphological parameters xi ? M=F(xi) Meteo information synthesis
Morphological variables: independent H, S , E , D Meteo information: dependent variable M Multiple regression Multiregressive analysis Height, Slope, Exposure, River bed distance M= F(xi) M= kp*H + kd*S + ke*E + kq*D
+H +E +D +S M *kh *ke *kd *ks Substrata superposition
All (92) station Mean of T min 2003 0,139 Area 1 Stations Mean of T min february 0,791 Area 1 Stations Mean of T max autumn 0,784 Coefficient exploration Dependent variable Performance (R2 ) Sample Period
Traditional representation Field of Temperature range
Mean of T min - 2003 AstiArea 1
Mean of T min – 02/03 “Barolo” Area
Mean of T mean - Spring 02/03 Asti andCuneo ProvinceArea 2
Production of useful supports for local advisors and farmers Conclusions Innovative and significant methodology for a “young”agrometeorological region Map developing of the most important climatic indexes (ex. Winkler, Huglin, Thermal excursions etc.)