1 / 29

Clinical Registries in Cardiac Surgery

Clinical Registries in Cardiac Surgery. Peter S. Greene, MD CMIO, Johns Hopkins Medicine Diane Alejo Information Systems Manager Division of Cardiac Surgery September 15, 2010 ICTR Clinical Registry Workshop. Cardiac Surgery Data Management . Cardiac Surgery Database spans 1944 - 2010

aurek
Download Presentation

Clinical Registries in Cardiac Surgery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Clinical Registriesin Cardiac Surgery Peter S. Greene, MD CMIO, Johns Hopkins Medicine Diane Alejo Information Systems Manager Division of Cardiac Surgery September 15, 2010 ICTR Clinical Registry Workshop

  2. Cardiac Surgery Data Management • Cardiac Surgery Database spans 1944 - 2010 • Clinical and administrative data tracking • Supports IRB approved clinical research activities • Allows longitudinal outcome follow-up • STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Data / STS Congenital Data • Heart and Heart- Lung Transplant Database • UNOS Registry • ISHLT / INTERMACS VAD Registry • Collaborative Transplant Research Database

  3. History of Cardiac Surgery Database STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Participation > 13,000 Johns Hopkins Adult Cardiac Operations submitted to STS from 1997- 2010

  4. Patient Care STS Research NQF PQRI Clinical Documentation Leap Frog DATA Performance Improvement Payers Billing UNOS Maintenance of Certification Resident Education Admin Reports

  5. STS Participation Clinical Data ICD 9 codes Performance Improvement Score Cards Maintenance of Certification Surgeon / Resident Portfolios DRG Codes LeapFrog / PQRI National Quality Forum Cardiac Database Payers , RFI / RFP’s REPORTS APRDRG codes Clinical Registries Administrative Reporting Billing / Resource Utilization CPT codes Research Data Consumers & Marketing Sources of Data and Reporting For Outcome Measurement & Research in Cardiac Surgery

  6. Some Lessons Learned Must have strong clinical leadership and pervasive buy-in Must integrate with clinical workflow Must provide net benefit to clinicians Must stay within scope of readily known data Must have a stable and capable clinical team Must have a stable and capable data team Must audit for completeness Must give regular feedback Must pre-stage submissions

  7. Outcome Data

  8. STS National Database Standardized information on cardiac & thoracic surgical procedures Data analyzed by separate, independent, objective data analysis center (DCRI) Opportunities to improve patient care # Participants # Records Harvest Adult Cardiac 992 2.7+ million 4 times / year General Thoracic 81 185,508 operations 2 times / year Congenital 142 96,628 operations 2 times / year

  9. STS National Database STS Pilot Pay For Performance (P4P) Program Incentive payments for achievement of thresholds in performance measures A model of quality improvement with 3 types of measures: Structureal: IT, database participation, volume Process: IMA use, discharge beta blockers Outcomes: Mortality, Morbidity: CVA, renal failure Blended STS NCD and financial (UB-92) database NQF performance measures 2007 PQRI Initiative – CMS New 2007 STS Composite Scoring System

  10. STS National Database DCRI – Data Warehouse and Analysis Center Data transmitted electronically National, Regional and “Like Institution” benchmarking Reports include site specific, risk adjusted, regional and national aggregate date including morbidity, mortality and LOS for CABG, Valves and CABG/Valve surgery Statistical Analysis – Risk Modeling- Logistic Regression, Hierarchical regression modeling

  11. STS National Database STS Auditing Risk factor model variables NQF measures Op log procedures Operative deaths and morbidity

  12. STS National Database Participation STS Adult Database 992 STS Congenital Database 81 STS Thoracic Database 142 Total 1215

  13. STS Composite Quality ScoreDistribution of Participant Site Ratings Percent March 2008

  14. STS Composite Quality Ratings Jan – Dec 2009 * Participant is significantly lower than the STS mean * * Participant is not significantly different than the STS mean * * * Participant is significantly higher than the STS mean

  15. Research InformaticsDepartment of Surgery

  16. PREMISES OF THIS PROPOSALFOR A SURGERY DATA CENTER • Almost every faculty member and research trainee has a need for accessing clinical data for research purposes • There is insufficient revenue to support a centralized research database • There is a modest amount of research database activity in the department • There is an extensive amount of clinical information within JHMI in an electronic format, but these exist in multiple sources • There is an extensive amount of surgical patient data being collected and analyzed for non-research activities (e.g.: safety, accreditation, payers, training)

  17. Departmental Prototype Lung Cancer Database (M. Brock) STS Thoracic Database ORMIS Clinical Data Maryland Trauma Registry EPR Transplant Information Systems Teleresults UNOS / CTRD IDX SALAR POE Specialty Surgical Research Databases Surgery Core Anesthesia ADR NSQIP Clinical Trial Databases Casemix CVIEW Tumor Registry Cardiac Surgery Database STS Adult Cardiac / Congenital Research Data ISHLT VAD Registry Internal Data Sources and Internal Database Initiatives

  18. Idea – Explore Influence of Randomness

  19. Idea – Quality Collaborative

  20. Idea – Patient Registries From Dr. Adrian Puttgen Dept. Neurology, Critical Care http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ2PFoHptK8

  21. Clinical Registry Opportunities Unique patient population Unique patient tracking capability Unique patient detail or comprehensiveness Unique patient data integration Regional quality programs National quality programs

More Related