1 / 9

Person-In-Charge Announces Their Decision

TYPES OF DECISION MAKING . Person-In-Charge Announces Their Decision . Person-In-Charge Asks For Input, Then Makes the Decision . Group Makes The Decision. Modified from Kaner, S. et al. 2007. Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making . DYNAMICS OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING .

aurora
Download Presentation

Person-In-Charge Announces Their Decision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TYPES OF DECISION MAKING Person-In-Charge Announces Their Decision Person-In-Charge Asks For Input, Then Makes the Decision Group Makes The Decision Modified from Kaner, S. et al. 2007. Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making

  2. DYNAMICS OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING GROAN ZONE ??? Convergent Thinking Divergent Thinking ??? !!!!! !!!!! ??? ??? ??? !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! discussion begins !!!!! ??? !!!!! decision made! ??? ??? !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! ??? Modified from Kaner, S. et al. 2007. Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making

  3. Full Participation • Mutual Understanding • Inclusive Solutions • Shared Responsibility options POLL for level of agreement Consensus-Based Decision Making options when most are okay with options VOTE based on your decision rule

  4. 1. For Procedural Votes • Charter (group norms, work plan, decision rules) • Criteria for listing and prioritizing • All other votes • 2. For Formal Recommendation Votes • Listing recommended management actions • Prioritizing recommended management actions YOUR TWO Decision RuleS

  5. Decision Rule examples 51% of those present = simple majority 75% of those present = super majority 100% of those present = unanimous

  6. Charter Language Conflicts of Interest CWG members and alternates will openly acknowledge any real conflicts of interest and refrain from using their position on the working group to secure unfair or inappropriate privilege, gain, or benefit. We will openly acknowledge any potential or perceived conflicts of interest to prevent misunderstandings that could detract from the success or credibility of the OFR Community Planning Process. CWG members or alternates who have a real or potential conflict of interest in a matter before the CWG will identify such conflict prior to discussion of that matter. The CWG will decide, after discussion and vote, if that member or alternate should recues them self from discussion and/or voting on that matter. If agreement on recusal cannot be reached by the CWG, then the SEFCRI Chair will decide.

More Related