1 / 12

module 5

M ultilateral E ducaton and I nterdisciplinary A pproach in E uropean C ontext0. Module.

austin
Download Presentation

module 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MultilateralEducaton and InterdisciplinaryApproach in EuropeanContext0 Module module 5 U r b a n – h i s t o r i c a l d e v e l o p m e n t o f c e m e t e r i e s i n r e l a t i o n t o b u i l d i n g s i t e a n d a r c h i v a l r e s e a r c h module 9 M e t h o d o l o g y o f i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a n d p r e s e n t a t i o n o f s e p u l c h r a l a r c h i t e c t u r e 10 module 10 L e g a l r u l e s a n d l a w s c o n c e r n i n g t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f c u l t u r a l a n d n a t u r a l m o n u m e n t s * Jara Lalková, Assoc. prof. Architect, MSc, Ph. D. * Dušan Ferianc, MSc. , Architect, Ph. D. * Martin Vaščák, MSc. Architect

  2. I n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y A p p r o a c h Problems of research of historical cemeteries in Urban - architectural and Landscape Evaluation point of view are based on Cultural History History of Arts Religion Sciences Etnology Folklore Studies Sociology Demography

  3. M a i n G o a l Main goal of project was to create an methodological manual consist of interpretation and terminology in sepulchral architecture V e r i f i c a t i o n a n d P i l o t P r o j e c t Verification of methods of cemetery evaluation was solved by pilot project in the locattion „Zvonový vŕšok“ in the town of Banská Štiavnica C a s e S t u d y The comparison of evaluation complexity was realised in cementeries of seven mining towns (Banská Bystrica, Banská Štiavnica, Kremnica, Nová Baňa, Banská Belá, Pukanec and Ľubietová)

  4. M e t h o d s o f C o m p l e x E v a l u a t i o n o f C e m e t e r i e s The Complex evaluation of urban-historical and landscape values of cemeteries should precede below mentioned types of research Urban – historical Research Architectural – historical Research Artistically – historical Research Archaeological Research Archives Research Archives - etnological Research Urban – etnological Research Sociological Research Structural Condition Research Dendrological Research Main Feature and Using of Land in the field of Cemetery and Extraordinary Landscape Component Geodetical Measurments Making and ID cards of all graves in researched cemetery and small architectural elements

  5. M e t h o d s o f C o m p l e x E v a l u a t i o n o f C e m e t e r i e s

  6. I d e n t i f i c a t i o n C a r d ( I D ) ID ID Photo location Grave Number Location in cemetery/Grave Number Unific Name Detailed Specification Number of Monument Proposal of inscribing to List of Heritage Date of inscribing into List of Monuments Common name Date of Formation Author Chronologize Prevailing style RODINA DONOVALOVÁ JÁN PAVLÍNA 1839 – 1918 1876 – 1963 ŠTEFAN MÁRIA 1870 – 1923 1904 – 1978

  7. I d e n t i f i c a t i o n C a r d ( I D ) Cultural-historical values Detailed specification of values Artistic values Shape and dimensions Desctiption Vegetation according to a grave Changes Materiology Structural Condition State RODINA DONOVALOVÁ JÁN PAVLÍNA 1839 – 1918 1876 – 1963 ŠTEFAN MÁRIA 1870 – 1923 1904 – 1978

  8. Note I d e n t i f i c a t i o n C a r d ( I D ) Type of Titles Language Titles of Grave RODINA DONOVALOVÁ JÁN PAVLÍNA 1839 – 1918 1876 – 1963 ŠTEFAN MÁRIA 1870 – 1923 1904 – 1978 Translation Personal data Famous person Owner References and Bibliography Made by Date Signature

  9. R e f e r e n c e C r i t e r i a f o r C o m p a r i s o n Criteria in AGE point of view in LOCATION point of view in CO-OPERATION TO LANDSCAPE point of view VISUAL CONTACT TO HISTORIC SITES (extraordinary views) in DOMINANT FEATURE point of view in MONUMENT PRESERVATION point of view In HISTORICAL (famous person, event, monument sight“

  10. R e f e r e n c e C r i t e r i a f o r C o m p a r i s o n In ARCHITETCTURAL QUALITY FEATURES point of view In QUALITY OF ARTISTIC FEATURES point of view In USING point of view In BURING point of view In TYPOLOGY point of view in QUALITY OF SERVICES point of view

  11. R e f e r e n c e C r i t e r i a f o r C o m p a r i s o n In TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE point of view In TRAFFIC CONECTION point of view In STATIC TRAFFIC CONDITION point of view In MORFOLOGY OF TERRAIN point of view In INSOLATION and DAYLIGHTING point of view In TYPE OF SOIL point of view In GREENERY point of view

  12. R e f e r e n c e C r i t e r i a f o r C o m p a r i s o n In DENSITY OF GREEN point of view In INNER AREA COMMUNICATION point of view In DENSITY OF GRAVE point of view In PERSPECTIVE OF USING point of view S l o v a k L e g i s l a t i o n Act. No. 49 / 2002 Z.z.„Act about Monument Collection PreservationAct. No. 543 / 2002 Z.z. „ Act about Nature and Landscape Preservation Other concernig rules and acts: Act. No. 50/1976 Zb., Act. No. 532/2002 Z. z., Act. No. 253/2010 Z. z. Thankyouverymuchforyourattention

More Related