120 likes | 284 Views
Guiding Principles of Grant Program. Students who attend a State's persistently lowest-achieving schools deserve better options and can't afford to waitQuality, not quantity, of LEA applications and implementation Need to build capacity and supports at all levelsNot a one-year activity
E N D
1. 2010 State Application for ESEA, Title I, Part A, §1003(g) School Improvement Grant Presentation to the
DESS Advisory Committee
February 2, 2010
2. Guiding Principles of Grant Program Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest-achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to wait
Quality, not quantity, of LEA applications and implementation
Need to build capacity and supports at all levels
Not a one-year activity – up to 3 years This is not the standard school improvement grant program – it is a special school improvement
grant intended to turn around the state’s lowest-achieving Title I eligible schools
Unprecedented funds are available to carry out sweeping change – using the same four school
interventions that are detailed in Goal 4 of Race to the Top:
Turnaround
Closure
Restart with CMO or EMO
Transformation
Grant funds will be available for 1 to 3 yearsThis is not the standard school improvement grant program – it is a special school improvement
grant intended to turn around the state’s lowest-achieving Title I eligible schools
Unprecedented funds are available to carry out sweeping change – using the same four school
interventions that are detailed in Goal 4 of Race to the Top:
Turnaround
Closure
Restart with CMO or EMO
Transformation
Grant funds will be available for 1 to 3 years
3. Program Requirements Implement one of 4 interventions (same as Race to the Top) in “persistently low-achieving” Title I schools and Title I-eligible secondary schools
Funds may be used across 3 years, but the majority of funds must be expended to fully implement interventions in Year 1 of the award
An LEA must apply for at least $50,000, but no more than $2,000,000 for each eligible school it commits to serve
An LEA can only apply once for each school – no continuation grants.
Funds will be available for up to 3 years, but the majority need to be spent in Year 1
Expectation is full intervention model implementation in Year 1
An LEA may apply for up to $2million for each eligible schoolAn LEA can only apply once for each school – no continuation grants.
Funds will be available for up to 3 years, but the majority need to be spent in Year 1
Expectation is full intervention model implementation in Year 1
An LEA may apply for up to $2million for each eligible school
4. Tiers of Schools Priority: two groups of “persistently low-achieving” schools:
Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring (Tier I schools).
Secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I, Part A funds (Tier II schools).
If sufficient funds, all other Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring (Tier III schools) Three tiers of schools are the three “categories” of eligibility for funds
Tier I = 5 lowest performing Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
or with less than a 60% graduation rate over a period of years
Tier II = 5 lowest performing middle and high schools eligible for, but not participating in Title I,
or with less than a 60% graduation rate over a period of years
States are not allowed to exclude any schools, so any Title I eligible special schools that get
accountability ratings are included
Title I eligible means 35% or higher poverty
Tier III = all other Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
Three tiers of schools are the three “categories” of eligibility for funds
Tier I = 5 lowest performing Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
or with less than a 60% graduation rate over a period of years
Tier II = 5 lowest performing middle and high schools eligible for, but not participating in Title I,
or with less than a 60% graduation rate over a period of years
States are not allowed to exclude any schools, so any Title I eligible special schools that get
accountability ratings are included
Title I eligible means 35% or higher poverty
Tier III = all other Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
5. “Persistently low-achieving schools” Lowest 5% or 5 schools (whichever greater) in Tier I and in Tier II determined by:
Academic achievement of the “all students” group in terms of proficiency on the State’s reading/language arts and mathematics assessments combined;
and
Lack of progress on the State’s assessments over a number of years in the “all students” group;
plus
High schools with graduation rates under 60% for multiple years
6. Total funds available State FY 10
$1,626,978 regular SIG +
$8,948,688 in ARRA
= $10, 575, 666 – 5% for state administration
$10,046,883 for LEAs to turn around schools
State FY 11 proposed allocation
$4,615,604
7. LEA application requirements An SEA must give priority to LEAs that apply to serve Tier I or Tier II schools.
An LEA with one or more Tier I schools may not receive funds to serve only its Tier III schools.
An SEA may not award funds to any LEA for Tier III schools unless and until the SEA has awarded funds to serve fully, throughout the period of availability, all Tier I and Tier II schools across the State that its LEAs commit to serve DE will give priority in the following order:
State Partnership Zone schools that are in SIG Tier I and II
Other SIG Tier I and II schools as follows:
Rank of both Tier I and Tier II schools lowest to highest
Determine LEA demonstrated capacity within the allocation
Fund LEA applications in rank order, lowest to highest, of performance in LEA
applications that demonstrated capacity
Tier III schools - only where Tier I and/or Tier II schools are already being funded
and where Tier III schools choose to implement one of the four SIG models
Tier III schools - only where Tier I and/or Tier II schools are already being funded
or in LEAs where there are not Tier I or II schools that choose
not to implement one of the four SIG models
If all Tier I schools are not served statewide, the SEA must reserve 25% of the total
allocation for use in the next school year’s grant awardsDE will give priority in the following order:
State Partnership Zone schools that are in SIG Tier I and II
Other SIG Tier I and II schools as follows:
Rank of both Tier I and Tier II schools lowest to highest
Determine LEA demonstrated capacity within the allocation
Fund LEA applications in rank order, lowest to highest, of performance in LEA
applications that demonstrated capacity
Tier III schools - only where Tier I and/or Tier II schools are already being funded
and where Tier III schools choose to implement one of the four SIG models
Tier III schools - only where Tier I and/or Tier II schools are already being funded
or in LEAs where there are not Tier I or II schools that choose
not to implement one of the four SIG models
If all Tier I schools are not served statewide, the SEA must reserve 25% of the total
allocation for use in the next school year’s grant awards
8. 5 Tier I schools FY 10 Stubbs Elementary School
Positive Outcomes Charter
Bancroft Elementary School
Pulaski Elementary School
Warner Elementary School
9. 6 Tier II Schools FY 10 William Penn High School
New Castle School
Mt Pleasant High School
McKean High School
Dickinson High School
Kent County Alternative School (grad rate)
10. State Waiver Requests To extend the period of availability of school improvement funds for the SEA and all of its LEAs to September 30, 2013.
To permit LEAs to allow their Tier I and Tier II Title I participating schools that will implement a turnaround or restart model to “start over” in the school improvement timeline.
Waive the 40 percent poverty eligibility threshold to permit LEAs to implement a schoolwide program in a Tier I or Tier II Title I participating school that does not meet the poverty threshold.
Waivers are recommended by US Ed – DE is applying for all possible waivers
Second waiver allows Tier I and Tier II schools participating in the grant to be
reset to Year 0 for AYP during Year 1 of implementationWaivers are recommended by US Ed – DE is applying for all possible waivers
Second waiver allows Tier I and Tier II schools participating in the grant to be
reset to Year 0 for AYP during Year 1 of implementation
11. Application Timeline State application to US Ed by February 8, 2010
US Ed promises two-week approval
Open LEA application as soon as state application is approved
20 business days for LEAs to submit
Goal: all awards granted by May 2010
12. Written Comments due by February 12, 2010 Please submit comments through email to:
Amelia Hodges
ahodges@doe.k12.de.us
13. Questions