170 likes | 374 Views
Can Cirrus Cloud Thinning Cool Climate Without Severe Climate Side Effects? CEC14 Berlin. Lawrence J ackson, Julia Crook & Piers Forster. Geoengineering challenges. Stratospheric SO 2. Marine cloud brightening. Jones et al. (2011).
E N D
Can Cirrus Cloud Thinning Cool Climate Without Severe Climate Side Effects? CEC14 Berlin Lawrence Jackson, Julia Crook & Piers Forster
Geoengineering challenges Stratospheric SO2 Marine cloud brightening Jones et al. (2011) • To return global mean temperature to some earlier state, precipitation is reduced by too much • Regional variations • Side effects e.g. Stratospheric O3 depletion, whiter skies • Partial solution e.g. ocean acidification • Only temporary
Cirrus clouds http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/learning/clouds/high-clouds Mean high cloud cover from CloudSat/CALIPSO 2B-GEOPROF R04 & 2B-GEOPROF-LIDAR P1.R04 data sets for 2006–2011 (Mace et al., 2009) http://www.climate4you.com/
What do we know about cirrus cloud thinning? Microphysics • Homogeneous nucleation • Requires high super-saturation levels • Dominates ice crystal production T < -40oC • Heterogeneous nucleation • Out competes homogeneous nucleation for water vapour • Introduce efficient heterogeneous ice nuclei • Temperatures < T -40oC • Larger ice crystals with greater fall speed • “Negative Twomey effect” (Kӓrchar & Lohmann, 2003) Geoengineering (Mitchell & Finnegan, 2009) Bismuth(III) Iodide (BiI3) • Has potential to offset anthropogenic warming • Requires optimum particle concentrations Climate model simulations (Storelvmo et al., 2013)
This study focuses on climate impacts • We adopt a simplified implementation in a GCM by modifying ice fall speed • Does cirrus cloud thinning: • Cool climate? • Change precipitation over land? • Cause regional variations in precipitation? • Could it complement stratospheric SO2 and MCB?
HadGEM2 CC run on HECToR & ARCHER Martin et al. (2011) The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate Configurations, Geosci. Model Dev, 4, 723-757
Simulation design • HadGEM2 forced with: • Historical data 1860-2005 • RCP4.5 2006-2099 • Geoengineering 2020-2069 • Control simulation is RCP4.5 • Climate baseline is 1986-2005 • Assess impacts of geoengineering on 2040-2059 climate means
Climate engineering by cirrus cloud seeding Some results …
Results – Changes in TOA radiation fluxes & cloud cover (2x fall speed) Outgoing shortwave radiation (Wm-2) Outgoing longwave radiation (Wm-2) Vertical profile of cloud cover (%) Cloud cover (%)
Results – change in temperature (1.5 K) MCB (-1 K) CIRRUS x4 (-1 K) CIRRUS x2 (-0.6 K)
Results – change in precipitation rate (kg m-2 day-1) MCB (land -0.2%) (land 3.2%) CIRRUS x2 (land 1.8%) CIRRUS x4 (land 1.4%)
Results – effects of climate geoengineering Temperature Precipitation CIRRUS x4 MCB
Conclusions A cooler climate without side effects? • But … • Regional variations in impact – especially precipitation • Is it scalable? • In practice how would we know if it works?