310 likes | 590 Views
The Ilioanal Pouch Reservoir and Pouchitis What is it? Why do some patients get it?. Dr. Matt. Johnson. Proctocolectomy. UC 10-20% all UC patients For medical refractory disease or dysplasia FAP Mean age at diagnosis of cancer = 39y. History of the IAPouch.
E N D
The Ilioanal Pouch Reservoir and PouchitisWhat is it?Why do some patients get it? Dr. Matt. Johnson
Proctocolectomy • UC • 10-20% all UC patients • For medical refractory disease or dysplasia • FAP • Mean age at diagnosis of cancer = 39y
History of the IAPouch • 1944 Proctocolectomy + Ileostomy (Strauss + Strauss) • 1969 Intra-Abdominal Ileal Reservoir (Kock) • 1978 Restorative Proctocolectomy • (Parks + Nicholls) • 1987 J-Pouch Modification • (Nicholls)
Pathological changes within a normal Healthy Pouch • 6/52 • plasma cell infiltration • raised eosinophils • Later = lymphocyte infiltration • 6/12 • Villous atrophy • >6/12 • “Normal adaptation” with cell influx stabilizing • Tendency to colonic metaplasia “colonic type mucosa”
Pouchitis Symptoms • A) Post Op Stool Frequency • B) Rectal Bleeding • C) Faecal Urgency* +/- Cramps • D) Fever (unusual) • * usually due to inflammation at the distal/efferent limb of the pouch • There is often poor correlation between symptoms and either the endoscopic or histology appearance
Endoscopic Findings in Pouchitis • Oedema • Granularity • Friable • Loss of vascular • Mucosal exudates • Ulceration • These changes can be patchy • Inflammation is often worse in the posterior/dependent segment of the pouch)
Histological Changes • 1986 Moskowitz Histopathological Scoring System • > 4/12 = Pouchitis • Acute • Acute PMNC infiltration into the crypts and surface epithelium (3/3) • Superficial ulceration (3/3) • Chronic • Chronic (lymphocytic) infiltration (3/3) • Degree of villous atrophy (3/3)
Pouchitis Disease Activity Index,Sandborn 1994 >7 = Acute Pouchitis
Clinical Pattern • After 6/12 patients fall into 3 catagories; • 1) No pouchitis (45%) • 2) Relapsing + Remiting Pouchitis (42%) • 3) Chronic Pouchitis (13%) • > 4/52 • Recurrent courses of antibiotics needed
Association with UC • Pouchitis occurs almost exclusively in UC patients • Pathologically similar to UC • Backwash Ileitis • Seen in 75% of pancolitis resection specimens • prevalence correlates closely with disease extent • It is a distinct entity from backwash ileitis • Similar responses to smoking • 25% non-smokers, 33% ex-smokers, 6% smokers • Extra GI Manifestations of IBD • especially PSC, though no obvious association with Arthropathy • Treatment response similar with 5ASAs and Steroids
Aetiology of Pouchitis • Flora (10x as much bacteria as cells in the body) • Prox jejunum 103 cfu/g of dry weight stool • Ileum 105-8 • Caecum 1011-12 • The proportion of anaerobes increases distally • Ileostomy = Flora increase by *80 • Anaerobe : aerobe (remains the same) • Caecum = 1000:1 • Ileal Pouch = 100:1 • Colonic type flora (bacterioides, bifidobacteria) • Bacterial profiles are genetically determined and remain stable lifelong • Pouchitis = no diff in bacterial qualitative + quantitative stool studies • Response to Abs suggests a pathogenic role for bacteria • Diverting ileostomy is therapeutic in CD (recurs 6/12 post re-anastamosis)
Aetiology of Pouchitis • Stasis • Does affect flora but no obvious relationship found • Intra luminal • Bile Acids = No obvious relationship • Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) • produced by anaerobes fermenting endogenous mucus and undigested CHO in the large bowel • Important in colonic epithelial metabolism, healing and proliferation (?protective) • The quantity in pouch faeces is inversely proportional to the degree of villous atrophy • Depleted levels seen in active UC
Immunology of IBD • 1) Humoral • 2) Cell Mediated • 3) Cytokines • 4) Flora Tolerance • 5) Innate Immunity
Humoral Immunity • Normal patients have IgA plasma cells provide immunity by immune exclusion • IBD the increased number of plasma cells secreting all classes of Ig (IgG*30, low IGA) • IgG1 (UC>CD) = increases the activation of the complement cascade in response to soluble protein Ag • IgG2 (CD>UC) = increases in response to CHO + bacterial Ags • CD = ASCA, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae • UC = pANCA, perinuc antineut cytoplasmic
Cell Mediated Immunity • Plasma cells are clearly increased + activated in IBD • The relative contributions of B cells and the T cell subtypes remain unclear in IBD • T cells play a more important role in CD (esp CD4cell) • Markers of T cell activity include • 4F2 CD+UC • T9 (transferrin receptors) CD+UC • CD25 CD only
Cytokine Immunity • Opsonisation > Phagocytosis > Presentation to CD4 cells • Naïve T cells in the presence of; • IL 12 develop into Th1 cells • IL 4 develop into Th2 cells • Th0 clones (secrete a mixture of Th1 + Th2) • Th1 (predominantly secrete IL2, IL12, TNFa and IFNg) - activates inflammatory and cytotoxic response - induces delayed type hypersensitivity • Th2 (IL 4, 5, 9, 10, 13) - decreased in active disease - activates Ab production • Tr1 (regulatory) (IL10, IFNg) - gene deletions of IL10 +IL2 lead to IBD
Immunology of IBD • Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines • TNFa secreted by macrophages (increased in UC) • IL1 “ • IL6 “ • IL8 recruitment of neutrophils (in CD+ UC)
IBD Immune Balance APCs Ag CD4+ T-cells Th1 (pro-inflammatory) Th2 (anti-inflammatory) IL 1,2,6,12, TNFa + IFNg IL 4,5,6,9,10,13 + TGFb TR1 regulatory
Immune Tolerance • The host immune system is able to distinguish between normal and pathogenic organisms • Tr1 cells are likely to play a critical role in maintaining immunosuppressive constraints on the highly antigenic bowel environment • Tolerance towards normal flora is broken in active IBD (Duchmann 1995) • Normal bacteria flora is required to generate inflammation (IL10 –ive mice = Madsen 1999)
Innate Immunity • Phylogenetically older than the specific active Tcell response • Uses receptors on APC (antigen presenting cells) • PRR = Pattern recognition receptors • TLR = Toll-like receptors • Leading to release of pro-inflammatory CKs (IL1, IL6, TNFa) • This acute phase response is independent of a specific Tcell response
Therapy for Pouchitis • There appears to be a bacterial precipitant • These bacteria appear to be Metronidazole sensitive G- anaerobes • Antibiotics (Metronidazole or Ciprofloxacin) • Probiotics VSL 3 / 4 (Gionchetti 1994) • 4* lactobacilli • 3* bifidobacteria • 1* Strep Salivarius • 1* S. thermaphiles • Remission can be maintained in 92.5% at 9/12 Vs 0% in the placebo group
Therapeutic Mechanisms • Antibacterials • Probiotics probably work by altering the hosts immune response at the GI mucosal surface • Increased IgA + IL 10 (anti-inflammatory) • Decreases IFNg and TNFa (pro-inflammatory) • Induces T cell shift towards Th2 (anti-inflammatory) • May competitively inhibit adherence of potentially pathogenic bacteria • Produce SCFAs and vitamins