1 / 10

Wraparound Supervisor Adherence Measure (W-SAM): A Pilot Eleanor Castillo, Ph.D. Veronica Padilla

Wraparound Supervisor Adherence Measure (W-SAM): A Pilot Eleanor Castillo, Ph.D. Veronica Padilla 19th Annual Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health Conference, Tampa, Florida February 24, 2006. Rationale. Supervision identified as a critical aspect of Wraparound

avedis
Download Presentation

Wraparound Supervisor Adherence Measure (W-SAM): A Pilot Eleanor Castillo, Ph.D. Veronica Padilla

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wraparound Supervisor Adherence Measure (W-SAM): A Pilot Eleanor Castillo, Ph.D. Veronica Padilla 19th Annual Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health Conference, Tampa, Florida February 24, 2006

  2. Rationale • Supervision identified as a critical aspect of Wraparound • No tool to date to measure this aspect of Wraparound • Concept adapted from Multisystemic Treatment’s (MST) Supervisor Adherence Measure (SAM)

  3. Rationale • WFI-3.0 measures adherence to Wraparound principles from the Youth, Caregiver, and Resource Facilitator perspective • WOF-2.0 measures the Child and Family Team aspect of Wraparound

  4. Description • Facilitator rates the Clinical Program Manager (CPM) • 40 Items • Likert Scale (1 = Never; 5 = Almost Always) • Administered quarterly • Highly reliable (alpha = .84-.98)

  5. PROCESS IMPLEMENTATION • Sponsorship from the Directors • Program quality improvement versus “mandate” • Immediate feedback

  6. Quality Management • Training • Evaluation • Overall Program Results • Individual CPM • Performance Appraisal • 360 • Annual

  7. Quality Management • 3-Tiered: Agency-wide, Program, and Individual • Training and Coaching • Evaluation • Performance Appraisal • Quarterly 360 feedback • Annual • Correlation between supervisor focus on the Wraparound process and youth outcomes

  8. Quality Management • Trend analyses • Fidelity consistency over time • What factors affect fidelity • Learning curve with new manager or facilitators

  9. Next Steps • Continue pilot • Conduct further analyses on the psychometric properties of the scale • Factor analyses • Items reduction

  10. Contact Information: Eleanor Castillo, Ph.D. Director of Outcomes & Quality Assurance Email: ecastillo@emq.org

More Related