1 / 18

DDC PPR & Performance Measures Workgroup

DDC PPR & Performance Measures Workgroup. Translating National Priorities into Action AIDD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute Alexandria, VA June 19-20, 2012. 1. Translating National Priorities into Action ADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute. Performance Measures for Councils.

avent
Download Presentation

DDC PPR & Performance Measures Workgroup

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DDC PPR & Performance Measures Workgroup • Translating National Priorities into Action • AIDD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Alexandria, VA • June 19-20, 2012 1

  2. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Performance Measures for Councils • Workgroup appointed Summer 2011 • Charge: propose new indicators for Councils • Goal: fewer indicators & more reflective of DD Act • Timeline: Quick • Coordinator: Sheryl Matney • Facilitator: Dr. Dianna Newman (University at Albany/SUNY)

  3. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Performance Measures for Councils • DDC Representatives: • Millie Ryan AK, Graham Mulholland PA, Anna Lobosco NY, Holly Riddle NC, Joanna Cordry TX, Vendella Collins MI, Wanda Willis TN, Ed Holen WA, Carol Stamatakis NH, Mike Brogioli & Lisa Oksala, NACDD. • AIDD: • Jennifer Johnson, Rita Stevens, Sara Newell, Carla Thomas • Monthly conference calls through Jan. 2011; 2-day meeting in Sept. 2011; 4 intermittent calls in 2012

  4. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • This workgroup relied on previous work done to prepare the NACDD concept paper: • Defining and Measuring Systems Change for State and Territorial Councils on Developmental Disabilities: A Concept Paper with Embedded Recommendations (May 2011) available at: http://www.nacdd.org • And the concept of systems change from: • Comprehensive Community Initiatives (A Toolkit for Federal Staff) available at: http://www.ccitoolsforfeds.org

  5. Draft LOGIC MODEL for DDCsfrom DD Act - January 5, 2012 draft

  6. An Example: Logic Model for Systems Change

  7. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Performance Measures for Councils • 2 global indicators proposed: • Self-advocacy • Systems Change • Group consensus: • These 2 areas represent common efforts across DDCs • These 2 areas represent our charge in the Act

  8. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Performance Measure – Self-Advocacy • 1.1 The number of people with developmental disabilities and families of those with developmental disabilities who were provided assistance in becoming active participants in making decisions that affect their lives. (Output- reported annually) • Provided assistance is defined as the following: • Technical assistance, • Training, • Financial assistance, • Mentoring, and • Other activities as defined in the Act. • 1.2 The percent of those people (in number one) who became active participants in making decisions that affect the following areas. (Outcome – reported annually) • Their lives (i.e. self-advocacy), • Others’ lives (i.e., family advocacy, advocacy, and coalitions), • Systems change that affects others (i.e. policy boards, advisory boards, governing bodies, leadership within or for agencies and organizations)

  9. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Performance Measure – Systems Change • 2.1 Number of outputs related to transforming fragmented approaches into a coordinated and effective system that represents the outcomes specified in the DD Act - i.e. policy statements, regulations, formal agreements, partnership agreements, effective/best/promising/evidence-based practices. (output – reported annually) • Created/improved/refined/deleted policies, statutes, regulations and/or procedures • Created/improved/refined/deleted programs • Leveraged/allocated/reallocated/dedicated use of funds • Leveraged/allocated/reallocated/dedicated use of resources, other than funds • Engaged organizations in systems change efforts, including best/promising/evidence-based practices developed/implemented/replicated • Organizations involved in coalitions/networks/partnerships • Policy maker educated • 2.2 Adoptions and/or implementation of above transformation approaches which move toward a coordinated and effective systems that represents the outcomes specified in the DD Act, i.e. policy statements, regulations, formal agreements, partnership agreements, effective/best/promising/evidence-based practices. (outcomes – 5 year measure) • Adoption/implementation of new/improved/refined/deleted policies, statutes, regulations and/or procedures • Adoption/implementation of new /improved/refined/deleted programs • Leveraged/allocated/reallocated/dedicated use of funds • Leveraged/allocated/reallocated/dedicated use of resources, other than funds • Organizations adopted/implemented best/promising/evidence-based practices developed/implemented/replicated

  10. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Workgroup Consensus on Outcomes • More targeted indicators for Councils • Indicators that are based on the DD Act • Indicators that more accurately reflect what Councils actually do

  11. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Immediate Next Steps • Determine whether these measures provide enough information to reflect the actual work of DDCs • Look at how the DDC indicators fit into what the National Performance Measures WorkGroup has developed for a comprehensive look at DD Act Programs (employment, housing/community living, self-determination)

  12. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Revisions to the PPR Template • AIDD staff proposed a set of revisions to the PPR template which aligns it to the new state plan template • The Workgroup reviewed and provided comments prior to additional revisions. • The most recent version of the proposed PPR template will be shared with you today – with an opportunity for comments scheduled into tomorrow’s agenda.

  13. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Next Steps Over Time • Consider revisions to the Consumer Satisfaction Survey • Further work on use of logic model to chart work over time (i.e. 5 year goals)

  14. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Proposed PPR Template

  15. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • What does all this mean • for our Council?

  16. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • What we need your reactions, ideas, feedback • . What do you like about the draft PPR Template? • . What are your concerns with the draft PPR Template? • . Where do you need more information?

  17. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Feedback on PPR Template revisions - - - • When: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 at 2:45–4:00pm • Where: Fitzgerald ABC • Please review the proposed PPR template and come prepared to address the three questions previously raised. • E-mail comments can also be forwarded to: • smatney@nacdd.org • jennifer.johnson@acf.hhs.gov

  18. Translating National Priorities into ActionADD 2012 Technical Assistance Institute • Thank you!

More Related