1 / 16

Minorities in STEM: What the data say

Minorities in STEM: What the data say. Norman L. Fortenberry, Sc.D. Executive Director ASEE. URM grad degrees ’72-’09 As percent of all US degrees == 10 percentage point increase. NSF Data. ASEE and EWC Data. Underrepresented Minorities in the Engineering Workforce: 2009.

avital
Download Presentation

Minorities in STEM: What the data say

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minorities in STEM:What the data say Norman L. Fortenberry, Sc.D. Executive Director ASEE

  2. URM grad degrees ’72-’09As percent of all US degrees == 10 percentage point increase NSF Data ASEE and EWC Data

  3. Underrepresented Minorities in the Engineering Workforce: 2009 Source: U.S. Census: American Community Survey, NACME

  4. Tenured/Tenure-Track Engineering Faculty: 2001 and 2010 Source: American Society for Engineering Education

  5. S&E degrees as % of all degrees1966 - 2008 NSF data Assoc includes ET All S&E fields, not just natural science and engineering

  6. Associates DegreesDegrees in field as percentage of all degrees for given group Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  7. Bachelors DegreesDegrees in field as percentage of all degrees for given group Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  8. Masters DegreesDegrees in field as percentage of all degrees for given group Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  9. Doctoral DegreesDegrees in field as percentage of all degrees for given group Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  10. Degrees to WhitesDegrees in field by level as percentage of all degrees to Whites at given level Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  11. Degrees to Asian/Pacific IslandersDegrees in field by level as percentage of all degrees to Asian/Pacific Islanders at given level Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  12. Degrees to BlacksDegrees in field by level as percentage of all degrees to Blacks at given level Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  13. Degrees to HispanicsDegrees in field by level as percentage of all degrees to Hispanics at given level Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  14. Degrees to Native AmericansDegrees in field by level as percentage of all degrees to Native Americans at given level Engineering Natural Sciences ASEE analysis of NSF data. Engineering excludes engineering technology to aid comparability. AAS challenge

  15. The Engineering Case for Diversity: “As a consequence of a lack of diversity, we pay an opportunity cost, a cost in designs not thought of, in solutions not produced.” -- William A. Wulf, former president of NAE

  16. ASEE Statement on Diversity • . . . . ASEE is committed to increasing the participation of diverse individuals in all venues where engineering [and engineering technology] is taught, practiced and supported.These include pre-college, college and industry environments as well as within professional organizations that support engineering. . . . • This statement is backed by specific participation goals (at the undergraduate, graduate, and faculty levels) for women and each URM group.

More Related