1 / 17

Complexity in cooperation

Complexity in cooperation. La Rochelle 10-11 May 2012 Marie-Hélène de Vrij-Bourigan. Content. NHL University European Studies Cooperation local national international Evaluation local national international. NHL University. 10,000 students / 1,000 personnel

Download Presentation

Complexity in cooperation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Complexity in cooperation La Rochelle 10-11 May 2012 Marie-Hélène de Vrij-Bourigan

  2. Content • NHL University • European Studies • Cooperation • local • national • international • Evaluation • local • national • international

  3. NHL University • 10,000 students / 1,000 personnel • university of applied sciences • Healthcare and Welfare • Technologies • Communication • Business and Management Studies • professional education programs • bachelor’s degree NHL responsiblefor: strategic plan, education concept, and standards

  4. Content • NHL University • European Studies • Cooperation • local • national • international • Evaluation • local • national • international

  5. European Studies (1) Objective: • The ES course offers a broad study programme which is focused on Europe and covers areas such as communication, economics, management, politics and law. • It prepares students for positions in internationally operating companies and organisations either in their home countries or abroad.

  6. European Studies (2)

  7. Content • NHL University • European Studies • Cooperation • local • national • international • Evaluation • local • national • international

  8. Local / department Cooperation at department level in order to: • Harmonizecompetencesamongdepartments • Offer a simpleandrecognizable system tostudentsandlecturers. • Check the quality of examsand assessments (Examination board) • Efficiency Through: • Examination board (evaluation)

  9. Local / education Cooperation at education level: • Programme • Education • Assessment Through: • Degree course meetings • Degree course committee • Externaladvice board • Evaluation by NVAO

  10. National Cooperation at national level in order to: • Determinecompetencesand professional profile • Determine the name of the course • Determine the type of Bachelor’sdegree • Exchange knowledge • Exchange material Through: • National meetings (Maastricht en Den Haag) • Evaluation by NVAO

  11. International Cooperation at international level in order to: • Establish partnerships in France, Germany, Spain, Britain etc… • Exchange knowledge • Exchange lecturersandstudents • Organiseinternationalprojects • Offer minors • Facilitatestudyabroad Through….?: • No consultativecommittee at international level (onlylocal) • No evaluationat international level (onlylocal)

  12. International

  13. Content • NHL University • European Studies • Cooperation • local • national • international • Evaluation • local • national • international

  14. Local cooperation pros cons Inexperienced examination boards: everything has to be built from scratch Room for improvement within Examination and Assessment • The Examination board determines clear (legal) boundaries • The Examination committee checks assessment and assessment criteria in order to safeguard quality.

  15. National cooperation pros cons Less scope for differentiation Cooperation versus competition • Clear agreements • Same education profile • Same type of bachelor • Same competence profile • Same accreditation criteria • Efficiency

  16. International cooperation pros cons Dutch ‘competence-based’ education unknown in other countries Learning agreements not clear / uniform enough Assessment and quality safeguards not uniformly dealt with. • Knowledge exchange through student and teacher exchange • Shared international projects • Shared minors

  17. conclusions / recommendations • Cooperation at international level has tobeorganisedwithin a nationalandlocal agreement framework. Thismakes cooperation more complex. • More cooperation at accreditationlevel is needed: • In the Netherlands: NVAO • In France: ACA, ECA, ENQA, … • In … After a common bachelor’sdegreeand a common master’sdegree we have to take a next step: a common accreditation

More Related