1 / 7

Abbreviations for Site-Names in GridView

A. Retico (CERN) SA1 EGEE 2007 ROC Managers Meeting Budapest, Hungary, 1st October, 2007. Abbreviations for Site-Names in GridView. Short history. End of August:

awen
Download Presentation

Abbreviations for Site-Names in GridView

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A. Retico (CERN) SA1 EGEE 2007 ROC Managers Meeting Budapest, Hungary, 1st October, 2007 Abbreviations for Site-Names in GridView

  2. Short history • End of August: • Following-up several complaints, GV service administrators asked the Cern roc-on-duty (it was me) for a way to contact all sites in order to agree with them on short names, previously defined, partially and arbitrarily by GV developers (happened to be the same people) • I suggested to open a GGUS ticket and let the ROCs reply • I (as Cern ROC) opened the ticket on behalf of GV admins. That was a mistake (ticket to be opened by CERN-PROD instead) • request perceived as “blessed” by Cern ROC rather that the fix to a production service it was meant to be • 1st week of September • GV modifies a bit the interface, allowing visualization with GOC DB names. • Today: • 4 tickets closed (CE,IT,SW,SEE); 2 to be closed (RU, Cern); 3 open (DECH,FR,UKI) ; 2 untouched (NE,AP) • no more site IDs shown in GV

  3. GV: current visualization • Short Names

  4. GV: current visualization • Long Names

  5. GV: in development • Short names • Job Status: site-wise distribution

  6. GV: in development • Long names (site view not available yet) • Effect example: “Job Status: RB-wise distribution”

  7. Comments • Original issue: SOLVED • All sites are apparently now represented correctly • Relevant tickets can IMO be closed • GV mapping: UKI ROC’s points are valid • Real need for short names? • Static mapping should be avoided • GV Developers stick to short names • Mapping names also in future versions • Not clear to me if there is a requirement about that • Main users of GV should be also be consulted • Requirements to GV come mostly by LCG Management and Quality Assurance • Suggestion: move this points to GV with a new ticket • A formal request is harder to ignore (as this case has shown)

More Related