250 likes | 271 Views
Iranian languages ; South Asia. Indo-European languages of the area. Aryan Nuristani Kati Indo-Iranian Dardic Kashmiri … Iranian Persian ( Farsi, Dari, Tajiki ), Kurdish languages , Balochi , Pashto … Indo-Aryan. Iranian languages. Iranian languages. Wikipedia.org. South Asia.
E N D
Indo-European languages of the area • Aryan • Nuristani • Kati • Indo-Iranian • Dardic • Kashmiri… • Iranian • Persian (Farsi, Dari, Tajiki), Kurdish languages, Balochi, Pashto… • Indo-Aryan
Iranian languages Wikipedia.org
South Asia Карта: Matthew Dryer
South Asia as a linguistic area • Dravidian • Indo-European • Indo-Aryan • Iranian (areal periphery) • Dardic • Nuristani • Sino-Tibetan (areal periphery) • Austroasiatic (areal periphery): Munda • Burushaski
Languages of India • 1991 Census of India: • 114 languages < 1,576 mother tongues (with more than 10,000 speakers) + 1,796 “unclassified”mother tongues • The largest languages: • Hindustani: Hindi (> 260 mln), Urdu (> 63mln.) • Bangla (> 193 mln.), Gujarati (> 46 mln.), • Dravidian: Telugu (> 74 mln.), Tamil (>68 mln.) , Kannada(> 37 mln.), Malayalam (> 33 mln.)
South Asia as a linguistic area • Colin Masica: • Retroflex consonants • Postpositions, OV, Adj N • Ideophones, echo-reduplication • “Dative subjects” Hindi (Bhatt 2003) • Quotatives: specific complementizers introducing direct speech (< forms of the verb ‘say’)
History: Iranian languages • Old Iranian • Avestan beginning of the 1 millenium BCE • Old Persian 6-4c BCE … • Middle Iranian 4c BC – 1 millenium AD • Middle Persian (Pahlavi), Sogdian, Parthian, … • New Iranian • …
History: Indo-Aryan languages • Old Indo-Aryan • Vedic Sanskrit mid 2nd millennium – 3-2c BCE • Classical Sanskrit mid 1st millennium BCE, Panini • Indian epic poetry 3-2c BCE: Ramayana, Mahabharata • Middle Indo-Aryan • Prakrits, Pali, Apabhraṃśa (mainly the 1st millennium AD) • New Indo-Aryan
General tendencies • From synthetic languages to analytic languages (postpositions, etc) • From fusion to agglutination • FromVO toOV • From accusative alignment to split accusative/ergative alignment • Originally dependent marking, later pronominal clitics akin to head marking
General tendencies These tendencies are not found everywhere, though. • Dravidian lgs are more or less synthetic • In India more analytic languages are located in the eastern part • Kashmiri: the usual order is SVO
Complex predicates / compound verbs • Predicates normally consist of two (or more parts). • Persian(Karimi 2008) Persian only has about 130 simplex verbs. (Cf. the same picture in East Caucasian.) • Urdu (Butt 2005)
Complex predicates • “Lexical verb” + Light verb(which contains the grammatical information). • Monoclausality: Complex predicates do not constitute several clauses. • Probably “complex predicates” is an umbrella term for a number of more or less different phenomena.
Case systems • In many modern Indo-Iranian languages, case systems are considerably reduced (up to 2-3 cases). • The borderline between cases and postpositions is not always obvious. Hindi: Basic cases Nom & Obl vs “Secondary” cases/postpositions (Erg, Gen, Dat/Acc, Abl/Instr etc.) Dravidian languages: Many markers treated as locative cases in some descriptions are thought to be postpositions in other descriptions.
Partial ergativity • In many Iranian, Indo-Aryan and Dardic languages, one observes ergative alignment in past tense (or in (some) past tenses).(Haig 2008: 12)
Частичная эргативность • 15 июня 2012 г. Приступили к эргативу. Это, доложу я вам, волшебная вещь в хинди, одна из тех, что глубоко трогают русскую душу и что-то проясняют про душу хиндийскую. (…) Так вот меня тронуло этакая скромная позиция субъекта. Не субъект что-то сделал, увидел, сказал, а это с ним произошло, объект как-то ему позволил с собой вступить в контакт. Что-то такое про принятие судьбы, что ли, принятие жизни как чего-то происходящего с тобой, а не просто сделанного тобой.У А.Ф.Лосева есть статья про эргатив, но в жару лень читать сложное, потом как-нибудь. hitrovka-studio.ru «Как я изучала хинди»
Partial ergativity In fact, in Hindi in past tense (de Hoop & Narasumhan 2008)… • ergative marker is found on the most volitional agents • ergative clitic marks volitionality even with some intransitive verbs:
… on a par withDOM In many Indo-Aryan and Iranian languages the specific/referential patient takes peculiar marking. Hindi (de Hoop & Narasumhan 2008) NB: =ko is the dative postposition
Iranian languages: word order Don Stilo: • Many Iranian languages violate statistical universals related to word order and differ between each other • For example, basically OV but
Iranian languages: word order • Possible explanation: Iranian languages as a “buffer zone” between left-branching languages (e.g., Turkic) and right-branching languages (e.g., Arabic). • Possible remarkable consequence: circumpositions (fit into any branching tendencies). Kurdish (McCarus 2009):
Iranian languages: ezafe • Primarily in Western Iranian, there is a specific marker which links the head and the attribute (adjective, possessor, sometimes relative clause) Persian (Kahnemuyipour 2006) mard-e châq‘fat man' man-Ez fat • Head marking? Or not? (Ezafe occurs immediately before the attribute, not necessarily on the head). Cp. Zaza Kurdish [láz-mьn]-opil‘my elder son’ son-EZF.POS.M1SG:OBL-EZF.ATR.Melder (Smirnova, Ejubi 1998: 35)
South Asia: causatives • Some languages distinguish between direct and indirect causatives. • Hindi (Bhatt 2003): • Direct (contact) causative: • Indirect (distant) causative:
South Asia: ideophones • Dravidian languages: Malayalam, Kannada, Telugu