Fair Value Measurement

1. Fair Value Measurement Ben Couch, Valuation Practice Fellow, FASB

2. Agenda • Project timeline and background • Fair value measurement overview • Disclosure • Application to nonpublic entities • Effective date and transition

3. Project Timeline 2005 2006 2007 2004 2003 Sep 2006 FASB issued SFAS 157 Nov 2006 IASB discussion paper published (using SFAS 157 as starting point) Jun 2003 FVM project added to FASB’s agenda Sep 2005 FVM project added to IASB’s agenda Jun 2004 FASB exposure draft published Sep 2004 FASB round table meetings

4. Project Timeline continued 2009 2010 2011 2008 May 2009 FASB FSP FAS 157-4 published Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly May 2009 IASB Exposure draft published Fair Value Measurement Nov-Dec 2009 IASB Round table meetings Jun 2010 FASB exposure draft published Amendments for Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs IASB exposure draft published Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Disclosure for Fair Value Measurements May 2011 Common IFRS and U.S. GAAP fair value measurement standards ASU No. 2011-04 IFRS 13 H2 2011 IFRS Foundation educational material Oct 2008 IASB Expert Advisory Panel report Measuring and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments in markets that are no longer active FASB FSP FAS 157-3 published Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the Market for that Asset is Not Active

5. Consistent fair value measurements IFRSs US GAAP Fair value measurement guidance in various standards Topic 820 (codified SFAS 157) May 2009 exposure draft Fair Value Measurement Objective: Common (identical) fair value measurement and disclosure standards

6. Fair Value Measurement Overview

7. Fair Value Measurement Overview continued

8. Premiums and Discounts • Must be consistent with characteristics of asset or liability and the unit of account • No block discounts  Market participants act in their economic best interest in a transaction for the unit of account.

9. Financial Instruments • Exception for financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market risk or counterparty credit risk • Entity must have documented risk management strategy • Only for portfolios of instruments measured at FV • Accounting policy decision

10. Financial Instruments continued • Market risks: • Must be substantially the same • Duration of instruments leading to exposure to market risk must be substantially the same • Counterparty credit risk: • Must have arrangement to mitigate credit risk in place

11. Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Is there an observable market price to transfer the instrument? Yes No Fair value = observable market price of instrument Does somebody hold the corresponding asset? Yes No Fair value = fair value of the corresponding asset Fair value = observable market price of asset Fair value = another valuation technique Is there an observable market price for the instrument traded as an asset? Yes No Fair value = another valuation technique

12. Disclosure • More information required for Level 3 fair value measurements: • A quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurement • A description of the valuation control process in place • A discussion of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any inter-relationships between those inputs that magnify or mitigate the effect on the measurement

13. Disclosure continued • Example

14. Disclosure continued • Current use of a nonfinancial asset when it differs from the highest and best use considered in its fair value measurement and reasons why • Required whether fair value is recognized or only disclosed • All transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy (no significance threshold)

15. Disclosure continued • For fair value measurements that are only disclosed, the level in which the fair value measurement would be categorized within the fair value hierarchy • Other disclosure requirements for fair value measurements would not apply

16. Application of Topic 820 to Nonpublic Entities • Measurement principles apply equally to public and nonpublic entities, but some disclosures not required for nonpublic entities • Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 • Sensitivity of Level 3 fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs • Level in which a fair value measurement would be categorized within the fair value hierarchy when asset or liability not measured at fair value in statement of financial position, but disclosure of fair value is required

17. Effective Dates and Transition 2012 2013 2011 January 1, 2013 IFRS 13 effective Prospective transition Early application permitted • May 2011 • Common IFRS and U.S. GAAP fair value measurement standards • ASU No. 2011-04 • IFRS 13 • December 15, 2011 • ASU No. 2011-04 effective • Public entities • Interim and annual periods • Prospective transition with disclosure of changes and quantitative effect • Early application not permitted • Nonpublic entities • Annual periods • Prospective transition with disclosure of changes and quantitative effect • Early application permitted for interim periods after December 15

18. Q&A Expressions of individual views by members of the FASB and its staff are encouraged. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter. Official positions of the FASB on accounting matters are determined only after extensive due process and deliberation.