1 / 52

CS 388: Natural Language Processing: Information Extraction

CS 388: Natural Language Processing: Information Extraction. Raymond J. Mooney University of Texas at Austin. 1. 1. Information Extraction (IE). Identify specific pieces of information (data) in a unstructured or semi-structured textual document.

ayita
Download Presentation

CS 388: Natural Language Processing: Information Extraction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CS 388: Natural Language Processing:Information Extraction Raymond J. Mooney University of Texas at Austin 1 1

  2. Information Extraction (IE) • Identify specific pieces of information (data) in a unstructured or semi-structured textual document. • Transform unstructured information in a corpus of documents or web pages into a structured database. • Applied to different types of text: • Newspaper articles • Web pages • Scientific articles • Newsgroup messages • Classified ads • Medical notes

  3. Sample Job Posting Subject: US-TN-SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Date: 17 Nov 1996 17:37:29 GMT Organization: Reference.Com Posting Service Message-ID: <56nigp$mrs@bilbo.reference.com> SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Position available for Software Programmer experienced in generating software for PC-Based Voice Mail systems. Experienced in C Programming. Must be familiar with communicating with and controlling voice cards; preferable Dialogic, however, experience with others such as Rhetorix and Natural Microsystems is okay. Prefer 5 years or more experience with PC Based Voice Mail, but will consider as little as 2 years. Need to find a Senior level person who can come on board and pick up code with very little training. Present Operating System is DOS. May go to OS-2 or UNIX in future. Please reply to: Kim Anderson AdNET (901) 458-2888 fax kimander@memphisonline.com Subject: US-TN-SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Date: 17 Nov 1996 17:37:29 GMT Organization: Reference.Com Posting Service Message-ID: <56nigp$mrs@bilbo.reference.com> SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Position available for Software Programmer experienced in generating software for PC-Based Voice Mail systems. Experienced in C Programming. Must be familiar with communicating with and controlling voice cards; preferable Dialogic, however, experience with others such as Rhetorix and Natural Microsystems is okay. Prefer 5 years or more experience with PC Based Voice Mail, but will consider as little as 2 years. Need to find a Senior level person who can come on board and pick up code with very little training. Present Operating System is DOS. May go to OS-2 or UNIX in future. Please reply to: Kim Anderson AdNET (901) 458-2888 fax kimander@memphisonline.com

  4. Extracted Job Template computer_science_job id: 56nigp$mrs@bilbo.reference.com title: SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER salary: company: recruiter: state: TN city: country: US language: C platform: PC \ DOS \ OS-2 \ UNIX application: area: Voice Mail req_years_experience: 2 desired_years_experience: 5 req_degree: desired_degree: post_date: 17 Nov 1996

  5. Named Entity Recognition • Specific type of information extraction in which the goal is to extract formal names of particular types of entities such as people, places, organizations, etc. • Usually a preprocessing step for subsequent task-specific IE, or other tasks such as question answering.

  6. Named Entity Recognition Example U.S. Supreme Court quashes 'illegal' Guantanamo trials Military trials arranged by the Bush administration for detainees at Guantanamo Bay are illegal, the United States Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The court found that the trials — known as military commissions — for people detained on suspicion of terrorist activity abroad do not conform to any act of Congress. The justices also rejected the government's argument that the Geneva Conventions regarding prisoners of war do not apply to those held at Guantanamo Bay. Writing for the 5-3 majority, Justice Stephen Breyer said the White House had overstepped its powers under the U.S. Constitution. "Congress has not issued the executive a blank cheque," Breyer wrote. President George W. Bush said he takes the ruling very seriously and would find a way to both respect the court's findings and protect the American people.

  7. Named Entity Recognition Example people placesorganizations U.S. Supreme Court quashes 'illegal' Guantanamo trials Military trials arranged by the Bush administration for detainees at Guantanamo Bay are illegal, the United States Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The court found that the trials — known as military commissions — for people detained on suspicion of terrorist activity abroad do not conform to any act of Congress. The justices also rejected the government's argument that the Geneva Conventions regarding prisoners of war do not apply to those held at Guantanamo Bay. Writing for the 5-3 majority, Justice Stephen Breyer said the White House had overstepped its powers under the U.S. Constitution. "Congress has not issued the executive a blank cheque," Breyer wrote. President George W. Bush said he takes the ruling very seriously and would find a way to both respect the court's findings and protect the American people.

  8. Relation Extraction • Once entities are recognized, identify specific relations between entities • Employed-by • Located-at • Part-of • Example: • Michael Dellis theCEO ofDell Computer Corporationandlives inAustin Texas.

  9. Early Information Extraction • FRUMP (Dejong, 1979) was an early information extraction system that processed news stories and identified various types of events (e.g. earthquakes, terrorist attacks, floods). • Used “sketchy scripts” of various events to identify specific pieces of information about such events. • Able to summarize articles in multiple languages. • Relied on “brittle” hand-built symbolic knowledge structures that were hard to build and not very robust.

  10. MUC • DARPA funded significant efforts in IE in the early to mid 1990’s. • Message Understanding Conference (MUC) was an annual event/competition where results were presented. • Focused on extracting information from news articles: • Terrorist events • Industrial joint ventures • Company management changes • Information extraction of particular interest to the intelligence community (CIA, NSA). • Established standard evaluation methodolgy using development (training) and test data and metrics: precision, recall, F-measure.

  11. Other Applications • Job postings: • Newsgroups: Rapier from austin.jobs • Web pages: Flipdog • Job resumes: • BurningGlass • Mohomine • Seminar announcements • Company information from the web • Continuing education course info from the web • University information from the web • Apartment rental ads • Molecular biology information from MEDLINE

  12. Medline Corpus TI - Two potentially oncogenic cyclins, cyclin A and cyclin D1, share common properties of subunit configuration, tyrosine phosphorylation and physical association with the Rb protein AB - Originally identified as a ‘mitotic cyclin’, cyclin A exhibits properties of growth factor sensitivity, susceptibility to viral subversion and association with a tumor-suppressor protein, properties which are indicative of an S-phase-promoting factor (SPF) as well as a candidate proto-oncogene … Moreover, cyclin D1 was found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine residues in vivo and, like cyclin A, was readily phosphorylated by pp60c-src in vitro. In synchronized human osteosarcoma cells, cyclin D1 is induced in early G1 and becomes associated with p9Ckshs1, a Cdk-binding subunit. Immunoprecipitation experiments with human osteosarcoma cells and Ewing’s sarcoma cells demonstrated that cyclin D1 is associated with both p34cdc2 and p33cdk2, and that cyclin D1 immune complexes exhibit appreciable histone H1 kinase activity …

  13. Medline Corpus: Named Entity Recognition (Proteins) TI - Two potentially oncogenic cyclins, cyclin A and cyclin D1, share common properties of subunit configuration, tyrosine phosphorylation and physical association with the Rb protein AB - Originally identified as a ‘mitotic cyclin’, cyclin A exhibits properties of growth factor sensitivity, susceptibility to viral subversion and association with a tumor-suppressor protein, properties which are indicative of an S-phase-promoting factor (SPF) as well as a candidate proto-oncogene … Moreover, cyclin D1 was found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine residues in vivo and, like cyclin A, was readily phosphorylated by pp60c-src in vitro. In synchronized human osteosarcoma cells, cyclin D1 is induced in early G1 and becomes associated with p9Ckshs1, a Cdk-binding subunit. Immunoprecipitation experiments with human osteosarcoma cells and Ewing’s sarcoma cells demonstrated that cyclin D1 is associated with both p34cdc2 and p33cdk2, and that cyclin D1 immune complexes exhibit appreciable histone H1 kinase activity …

  14. Medline Corpus: Relation ExtractionProtein Interactions TI - Two potentially oncogenic cyclins, cyclin A and cyclin D1, share common properties of subunit configuration, tyrosine phosphorylation and physical association with the Rb protein AB - Originally identified as a ‘mitotic cyclin’, cyclin A exhibits properties of growth factor sensitivity, susceptibility to viral subversion and association with a tumor-suppressor protein, properties which are indicative of an S-phase-promoting factor (SPF) as well as a candidate proto-oncogene … Moreover, cyclin D1 was found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine residues in vivo and, like cyclin A, was readily phosphorylated by pp60c-src in vitro. In synchronized human osteosarcoma cells, cyclin D1 is induced in early G1 and becomes associated with p9Ckshs1, a Cdk-binding subunit. Immunoprecipitation experiments with human osteosarcoma cells and Ewing’s sarcoma cells demonstrated that cyclin D1 is associated with both p34cdc2 and p33cdk2, and that cyclin D1 immune complexes exhibit appreciable histone H1 kinase activity …

  15. Web Extraction • Many web pages are generated automatically from an underlying database. • Therefore, the HTML structure of pages is fairly specific and regular (semi-structured). • However, output is intended for human consumption, not machine interpretation. • An IE system for such generated pages allows the web site to be viewed as a structured database. • An extractor for a semi-structured web site is sometimes referred to as a wrapper. • Process of extracting from such pages is sometimes referred to as screen scraping.

  16. Amazon Book Description …. </td></tr> </table> <b class="sans">The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence</b><br> <font face=verdana,arial,helvetica size=-1> by <a href="/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author= Kurzweil%2C%20Ray/002-6235079-4593641"> Ray Kurzweil</a><br> </font> <br> <a href="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0140282025.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg"> <img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0140282025.01.MZZZZZZZ.gif" width=90 height=140 align=left border=0></a> <font face=verdana,arial,helvetica size=-1> <span class="small"> <span class="small"> <b>List Price:</b> <span class=listprice>$14.95</span><br> <b>Our Price: <font color=#990000>$11.96</font></b><br> <b>You Save:</b> <font color=#990000><b>$2.99 </b> (20%)</font><br> </span> <p> <br> …. </td></tr> </table> <b class="sans">The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence</b><br> <font face=verdana,arial,helvetica size=-1> by <a href="/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author= Kurzweil%2C%20Ray/002-6235079-4593641"> Ray Kurzweil</a><br> </font> <br> <a href="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0140282025.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg"> <img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0140282025.01.MZZZZZZZ.gif" width=90 height=140 align=left border=0></a> <font face=verdana,arial,helvetica size=-1> <span class="small"> <span class="small"> <b>List Price:</b> <span class=listprice>$14.95</span><br> <b>Our Price: <font color=#990000>$11.96</font></b><br> <b>You Save:</b> <font color=#990000><b>$2.99 </b> (20%)</font><br> </span> <p> <br>…

  17. Extracted Book Template Title: The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence Author: Ray Kurzweil List-Price: $14.95 Price: $11.96 : :

  18. Template Types • Slots in template typically filled by a substring from the document. • Some slots may have a fixed set of pre-specified possible fillers that may not occur in the text itself. • Terrorist act: threatened, attempted, accomplished. • Job type: clerical, service, custodial, etc. • Company type: SEC code • Some slots may allow multiple fillers. • Programming language • Some domains may allow multiple extracted templates per document. • Multiple apartment listings in one ad

  19. IE as Sequence Labeling • Can treat IE as a sequence labeling problem. • Can apply a sliding window classifier using various classification algorithms. • Can apply probabilistic sequence models: • HMM • CRF

  20. Pattern-Matching Rule Extraction • Another approach to building IE systems is to use pattern-matching rules for each field to identify the strings to extract for that field. • When building web extraction systems (wrappers) manually, it is common to write regular expression patterns (in a language like Perl) to identify the desired regions of the text. • Works well when a fairly fixed local context is sufficient to identify extractions, as in extracting from web pages generated by a program or very stylized text like classified ads.

  21. Regular Expressions • Language for composing complex patterns from simpler ones. • An individual character is a regex. • Union: If e1 and e2 are regexes, then (e1 | e2) is a regex that matches whatever either e1 or e2 matches. • Concatenation: If e1 and e2 are regexes, then e1e2 is a regex that matches a string that consists of a substring that matches e1 immediately followed by a substring that matches e2 • Repetition (Kleene closure): If e1 is a regex, then e1* is a regex that matches a sequence of zero or more strings that match e1

  22. Regular Expression Examples • (u|e)nabl(e|ing) matches • unable • unabling • enable • enabling • (un|en)*able matches • able • unable • unenable • enununenable

  23. Enhanced Regex’s (Perl) • Special terms for common sets of characters, such as alphabetic or numeric or general “wildcard”. • Special repetition operator (+) for 1 or more occurrences. • Special optional operator (?) for 0 or 1 occurrences. • Special repetition operator for specific range of number of occurrences: {min,max}. • A{1,5} One to five A’s. • A{5,} Five or more A’s • A{5} Exactly five A’s

  24. Perl Regex’s • Character classes: • \w (word char) Any alpha-numeric (not: \W) • \d (digit char) Any digit (not: \D) • \s (space char) Any whitespace (not: \S) • . (wildcard) Anything • Anchor points: • \b (boundary) Word boundary • ^ Beginning of string • $ End of string

  25. Perl Regex Examples • U.S. phone number with optional area code: • /\b(\(\d{3}\)\s?)?\d{3}-\d{4}\b/ • Email address: • /\b\S+@\S+(\.com|\.edu|\.gov|\.org|\.net)\b/

  26. Simple Extraction Patterns • Specify an item to extract for a slot using a regular expression pattern. • Price pattern: “\b\$\d+(\.\d{2})?\b” • May require preceding (pre-filler) pattern to identify proper context. • Amazon list price: • Pre-filler pattern: “<b>List Price:</b> <span class=listprice>” • Filler pattern: “\$\d+(\.\d{2})?\b” • May require succeeding (post-filler) pattern to identify the end of the filler. • Amazon list price: • Pre-filler pattern: “<b>List Price:</b> <span class=listprice>” • Filler pattern: “.+” • Post-filler pattern: “</span>”

  27. Adding NLP Information to Patterns • If extracting from automatically generated web pages, simple regex patterns usually work. • If extracting from more natural, unstructured, human-written text, some NLP may help. • Part-of-speech (POS) tagging • Mark each word as a noun, verb, preposition, etc. • Syntactic parsing • Identify phrases: NP, VP, PP • Semantic word categories (e.g. from WordNet) • KILL: kill, murder, assassinate, strangle, suffocate • Extraction patterns can use POS or phrase tags. • Crime victim: • Prefiller: [POS: V, Hypernym: KILL] • Filler: [Phrase: NP]

  28. Pattern-Match Rule Learning • Writing accurate patterns for each slot for each application requires laborious software engineering. • Alternative is to use rule induction methods. • RAPIER system (Califf & Mooney, 1999) learns three regex-style patterns for each slot: • Pre-filler pattern • Filler pattern • Post-filler pattern • RAPIER allows use of POS and WordNet categories in patterns to generalize over lexical items.

  29. “…located in Atlanta, Georgia…” “…offices in Kansas City, Missouri…” Rapier Pattern Induction Prefiller: “in” as Prep Filler: 1 to 2 PropNouns Postfiller: PropNoun which is a State RAPIER Pattern Induction Example • If goal is to extract the name of the city in which a posted job is located, the least-general-generalization constructed by RAPIER is:

  30. Evaluating IE Accuracy • Always evaluate performance on independent, manually-annotated test data not used during system development. • Measure for each test document: • Total number of correct extractions in the solution template: N • Total number of slot/value pairs extracted by the system: E • Number of extracted slot/value pairs that are correct (i.e. in the solution template): C • Compute average value of metrics adapted from IR: • Recall = C/N • Precision = C/E • F-Measure = Harmonic mean of recall and precision

  31. IE Experiment in Bioinformatics • Large scale comparison of IE methods on identifying names of human proteins in biomedical journal abstracts (Bunescu et al. 2004). • Goal is to mine the large body of biomedical literature to extract a useful database of all known protein interactions. • Biologists can use this “protein network” to better understand the overall biochemical functioning of an organism.

  32. Non-Learning Protein Extractors • Dictionary-based extraction • Uses a “gazetteer” of known human protein names. • KEX (Fukuda et al., 1998) • General protein-name identifier not specialized for human.

  33. Learning Methods for Protein Extraction • Rule-basedpattern induction • Rapier (Califf & Mooney, 1999) • BWI (Freitag & Kushmerick, 2000) • Token classification (chunking approach): • K-nearest neighbor • Transformation-Based Rule Learning Abgene (Tanabe & Wilbur, 2002) • Support Vector Machine (maximum-margin Perceptron) • Maximum entropy (discriminative version of Naïve Bayes) • Hidden Markov Models • Conditional Random Fields (Lafferty, McCallum, and Pereira, 2001) • Relational Markov Networks (Taskar, Abbeel, and Koller, 2002)

  34. Biomedical Corpora • AIMed: 750 abstracts that contain the word human were randomly chosen from Medline for testing protein name extraction. They were manually tagged by experts to annotate a total of 5,206 human protein references (Bunescu et al., 2005). • Yapex: Another corpus of 200 abstracts manually tagged for human protein names.

  35. Experimental Method • 10-fold cross-validation: Average results over 10 trials with different training and (independent) test data. • For methods which produce confidence in extractions, vary threshold for extraction in order to explore recall-precision trade-off. • Use standard methods from information-retrieval to generate a complete precision-recall curve. • Maximizing F-measure assumes a particular cost-benefit trade-off between incorrect and missed extractions.

  36. Protein Name Extraction ResultsAIMed Corpus

  37. Protein Name Extraction Results Yapex Corpus

  38. Relation Extraction • Biomedical corpora => Interactions between Proteins. interaction protein protein Cyclin D1is induced in early G1 and becomes associated withp9Ckshs1,a Cdk binding subunit. • Newspaper corpora => relationships (e.g. Role, Part, Location, Near, Social) between predefined types of entities (e.g. Person, Organization, Facility, Location, Geo-Political). location location people people facility Protestersseized several pumping stations, holding 127 Shell workers hostage.

  39. ELCS (Extraction using Longest Common Subsequences) • A method for inducing pattern-matchrules that extract interactions between previously tagged proteins. • Each rule consists of asequence of words with allowable word gaps between them (similar to Blaschke & Valencia, 2001, 2002). - (7)interactions (0) between (5)PROT(9)PROT(17) . • Any pair of proteins in a sentence if tagged as interacting forms a positive example, otherwise it forms a negative example. • Positive examples are repeatedly generalizedto form rules until the rules become overly general and start matching negative examples.

  40. - (7)interactions(0)between(5)PROT(9) PROT (17). Generalizing Rules using Longest Common Subsequence The self - association site appears to be formed by interactions between helices 1 and 2 ofbeta spectrin repeat 17 of one dimer with helix 3 of alpha spectrin repeat 1 of the other dimer to form two combined alpha - beta triple - helical segments . Title - Physical and functional interactions between the transcriptional inhibitors Id3 and ITF-2b .

  41. Protein Interaction Corpus • 200 abstracts previously known to contain protein interactions were obtained from the Database of Interacting Proteins. They contain 1,101 interactions and 4,141 protein names. • As negative examples for interaction extraction are rare, an extra set of 30 abstracts containing sentences with non-interacting proteins are included. • The resulting 230 abstracts are used for testing protein interaction extraction.

  42. Protein Interaction Extraction Results(gold-standard protein tags)

  43. Protein Interaction Extraction Results(automated protein tags)

  44. ERK: Relation Extraction using a String Subsequence Kernel • Subsequences of words and POS tags are used as implicit features. • Assumes the entities have already been annotated. • The feature space can be further pruned down – in almost all examples, a sentence asserts a relationship between two entities using one of the following patterns: • [FI]Fore-Inter: ‘interaction of P1with P2’, ‘activationof P1by P2’ • [I]Inter: ‘P1interacts with P2’, ‘P1is activated by P2’ • [IA]Inter-After: ‘P1– P2complex’, ‘P1and P2interact’ [Bunescu et al., 2005]. interaction of(3)PROT(3)withPROT

  45. Protein Interaction Extraction Results(gold-standard protein tags)

  46. ACE 2002 Newspaper Corpus • Newspaper article extraction task. • Documents: • 422 training documents • 97 test documents • Extracted information: • Entities: Person, Organization, Facility, Location, _______Geopolitical Entity • Relations: Role, Part, Located, Near, Social

  47. ACE 2002 Newspaper Corpus • Compared • ERK: string subsequence kernel extractor • K4: The tree dependency kernel from [Culotta et. al, 2004].

  48. Text Mining • Automatically extract information from a large corpus to build a large database or knowledge-base of useful information. • For example, we have used our trained protein interaction extractor to mine biomedical journal abstracts: • Input: 753,459 Medline abstracts that reference “human” • Output: Database of 6,580 interactions between 3,737 human proteins

  49. Active Learning • Annotating training documents for each application is difficult and expensive. • Random selection can waste effort on annotating documents that do not help the learner. • Best to focus human effort on annotating the most informative documents. • Active learning methods pick only the most informative examples for training. • At each step, select the example that is estimated to be the most useful for improving the current learner and then ask the human oracle to annotate this example.

  50. Uncertainty Sampling • Assume learned system can provide confidence in its predicted labelings of examples. • From a pool of unlabeled data, pick as most informative, the unlabelled example about which the current learned system is most uncertain. Let D be a set of unlabeled examples Until desired accuracy is reached Apply current learned system, L, to all examples in D From D, select the example, E, whose label is most uncertain Ask the user to label E and remove it from D. Add E to the training set and retrain L

More Related