1 / 18

André M. Biancareli Lecturer and researcher

The financial dimension of South American Integration: an assessment of the initiatives and a tentative quantification. André M. Biancareli Lecturer and researcher Institute of Economics, State University of Campinas (Brazil); CNPq researcher. Rationale and objective.

ayla
Download Presentation

André M. Biancareli Lecturer and researcher

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The financial dimension of South American Integration: an assessment of the initiatives and a tentative quantification André M. Biancareli Lecturer and researcher Institute of Economics, State University of Campinas (Brazil); CNPq researcher

  2. Rationale and objective • Among the various dimensions of regional integration process, the financial is one of the less studied. • The South American recent experience is rich in terms of institutions and ambitions, but scant attention have been paid to the quantification of financial linkages. • The main objective of the paper is to contrast the institutional side to the actual level of the financial integration process in South America. • How much financially integrated are, in fact, South American economies?

  3. Methodology • After a short theoretical introduction, two main tasks were addressed: • A brief description of the initiatives for financial cooperation operating in the region. • Two levels: short-term and long-term financing. • A tentative quantification, by means of 3 sets of indicators: • “Official” integration indicators. • Price indicators. • Quantity indicators.

  4. Results: Institutional framework of financial integration in South America • General impression of a diversified and adequate institutional framework, in both levels: • CCR, SML, FLAR. • CAF, FONPLATA, Banco del Sur etc. • Structure coherent with the high level of ambition presented in official rhethoric and documents • Preliminary conclusion: from the institutional perspective, the financial integration in South America is solid.

  5. Results: “official” integration indicators • Quantification of initiative’s performance in achieving its specific integration goals. • Examples: the amount of foreign currency saved by CCR or SML; the liquidity assistance provided by FLAR; amounts and profile of CAF’s and FONPLATA’s loans etc. • In general, poor performance: • Very disappointing results of CCR and SML. • Active (but limited geographically) role of FLAR. • Increasing but insufficient disbursements by regional development banks.

  6. Results: price indicators • Derived from the “law of one price”: • Results should be taken with caution. • Indicators (correlation and dispersion) from three sources: • Money markets; • Bond markets; • Stock markets. • Mixed results: • Low level of correlation in money markets. • High level in bond and stock markets. • Correlation or contagion?

  7. Results: quantity indicators • Using IMF data (Current Portfolio Investment Survey) and national sources, indicators trying to quantify stocks and flows interpenetration: • Portfolio external assets and liabilities indicators; • Other external assets and liabilities (for Brazilian case). • Very low levels of integration! • The only exception is the case of Brazil’s loans and export financing, maybe signaling an important regional role played by Brazilian banks (private and state-owned). • Sharp contrast with higher levels observed in some Asian economies.

  8. Chalenges faced • Quality and availability of data • Some theoretical doubts about indicators of financial integration • Especially price indicators • Organization of the results • Trade off information x clarity

  9. Concluding remarks • There is a huge gap between the official intentions/institutions and the actual level of financial integration in the region. • Even the official initiatives show disappointing results (in general). • More research on the causes of these failures is needed. • These facts support the idea of a more politically-driven integration in South America. • Exactly the opposite of trends in Asia! • Given the importance of financial support to the regional integration as a whole, these results can help to address some of the weaknesses of the process.

  10. Future steps • This is also part of a broader research project about the financial situation and integration in South America. • Other complementary studies on the issues raised here are planned. • Regarding this paper, the plans from now on are: • To finish the incomplete parts. • Incorporating the critics and suggestions. • To deepen the comparison with Asean experience (maybe in other papers). • Discussion in academic seminars already scheduled. • Submission to international academic reviews.

  11. Results: “official” integration indicators

  12. Results: “official” integration indicators

  13. Results: “official” integration indicators

  14. Results: price indicators, correlations

  15. Results: quantity indicators, portfolio assets

  16. Results: quantity indicators, portfolio liabilities

  17. Results: quantity indicators, other external assets (Brazil)

  18. Results: quantity indicators: FDI flows

More Related