80 likes | 207 Views
COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Management of Industry Documentation Road Pavement Forum 6 & 7 May 2008 Rob Lindsay. 14 th RPF Resolution #6.
E N D
COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC)Management of Industry DocumentationRoad Pavement Forum6 & 7 May 2008Rob Lindsay
14 th RPF Resolution #6 “That an RPF task group be established under the leadership of Elzbieta Sadzik and Rob Lindsay to discuss a new structure and a way forward for the COTO Road Materials Committee.”
COTO Technical Subcommittees • Historic Mandate • Facilitate technology transfer amongst road authorities • Collate state of the art technology and practice • Develop national standards • Produce / revise relevant TRH and TMH (E Sadzik)
RPF Task Group • Workshop on 18 February 2008 • Present • E Sadzik • M Henderson • B Verhaeghe • I McDonald • L Sampson • T Distin • L Kannemeyer • R Lindsay
RPF Task Group • Workshop Agenda • Problem Statement • RMC functions • Membership of RMC • RCB Task Group proposed COTO structure • Road Engineering Academy • Austroads and AASHTO approach • RMC – the future
RPF Task Group • Discussion (Industry Documentation) • RMC mandate implicitly withdrawn • No vertical integration (RCC and COTO) • Difficulty with national funding • Absence of approval mechanism • Aggravating factors • Diminishing expertise in the State Road Authorities • MTC and RNMS
RPF Task Group • Proposal (Industry Documentation) • Support Formation of RECB • Transfer RMC document mandate to RECB • Vertical integration (RCB and/or COTO) • RECB compete for funding from DST • Broad representation • Private and public sectors • Special Interest Groups (RMC) • State, Metro, and Local Authorities • Approval mechanism?
RPF Task Group • Proposal (Industry Documentation) • RCC technical disciplines accommodated • Road Prism, Pavement Layers, Minor Structures, Geometric Design. • RCC technical disciplines not accommodated • Road Network Management, Major Structures, Survey, Construction.