1 / 37

Welcome

North Carolina Student Growth Portfolio Spring 2013 Pilot Arts Education, Healthful Living, World Languages February 25, 2013. Welcome. Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Director K-12 Curriculum & Instruction North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Overview of Standard 6.

azana
Download Presentation

Welcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. North CarolinaStudent Growth PortfolioSpring 2013 PilotArts Education, Healthful Living, World LanguagesFebruary 25, 2013

  2. Welcome Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Director K-12 Curriculum & Instruction North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

  3. Overview of Standard 6 Tara C. Patterson, MSA Professional Development Lead Consultant Southeast Region Educator Recruitment and Development North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

  4. Agenda For Institute Educator Effectiveness www.ncpublicschools.org/educatoreffect/

  5. Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contribute to Academic Success Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice • Principals (and other Administrators) 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Human Resource Leadership External Development Leadership Micro-politicalLeadership Academic Achievement Leadership Strategic Leadership InstructionalLeadership Cultural Leadership ManagerialLeadership Strategic Leadership

  6. Teacher Ratings CategoriesRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contribute to Academic Success Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice • 5 Rating Categories • 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  7. Teacher Status Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ 1 2 3 4 5 Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Demonstrate Leadership Reflect on Practice Standards 1-5In the year Proficient or Higher on Standards1-5 Any rating lower than proficient Accomplishedor Higher on Standards1-5 And/Or And And Standard 6Three-year rolling average Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth ) / 3 ) 6 6 6 + + 2 years ago 1 year ago Currentyear

  8. Growth Data for Teachers B A C D Courses Focused on Performance Locally Developed Courses MSLs EOCs, EOGs, and VoCATS • Guidance from DPI by 2013- 2014 on appropriate methods to gather and analyze evidence of student learning based on the: • Performance-based nature of content area and NCES • Varying amounts of instructional time and program configurations

  9. Piloting the Standard 6: Student Growth Portfolio

  10. Ice Breaker

  11. Take Off & Touch Down • Who do you educate? • How far did you drive for today? • What content area in the Spring 2013 pilot do you represent?

  12. Pilot Participants Check your 5-digit Pilot ID . . . 2 letters for content area 3 numbers for role in pilot < 099 = Submitter > 100 = Evaluator

  13. Purpose of Pilot To inform the guidance for implementing the portfolio process

  14. Overview • Comprehensive • Measure student growth • 3-6 Samples (individuals and groups) • Reflect programs and courses taught • Blind, holistic review done online by 2 colleagues with content area expertise

  15. SGP: Full Scale vs. Pilot • Initiation form with principal’s signature • 3-6 samples with 2 evidences per sample • System ID used to match for review Proposed Full Scale Spring 2013 Pilot • Online profile with no signature needed • 2 samples with 2 evidences per sample • Pilot ID from NCDPI used to match for review

  16. SGP: Full Scale vs. Pilot • Descriptive feedback from review • Year 1 implementation is 2013-2014 • All AE, HL and WL teachers Proposed Full Scale Spring 2013 Pilot • Generate list of phrases for descriptive feedback • Pilot informs NCEES • 35 educators from each content area

  17. Timeline

  18. How do you measure growth? • Two points in time • Tools for measuring • Two evidences • Method or tool for recording • Comparison of two evidences • Something specific to measure

  19. How do you measure growth?

  20. Developing the Standard 6: SGP

  21. Initiation

  22. Submission Form A

  23. Portfolio Planning Template

  24. Student Work Sample

  25. Student Work Sample

  26. Submission Form B and C

  27. Brain Break

  28. Standard 6 and Ratings • Portfolio rating informs Standard 6 • 3-year rolling average from Standard 6 combines with NCEES Standards 1-5 to determine overall status Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  29. Standard 6 and Ratings Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  30. Standard 6 and Ratings Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  31. Exceeds Meets Does Not Meet Scoring the Standard 6: SGP

  32. Exit Ticket to Lunch

  33. Introducing the Standard 6: SGP Online Platform at NC Education

  34. Compiling & Responding to Questions about the Standard 6: SGP Pilot and Process

  35. Wrap-Up & Next Steps

More Related