170 likes | 352 Views
Hong Kong People Working on the Mainland: A Force for Integration?. A Preliminary Report by the CCTR-Zhongshan University Research Team 28 April 2010. Defining Identity Shift. Several ways to measure “Identity” and “Identity Change:”
E N D
Hong Kong People Working on the Mainland: A Force for Integration? A Preliminary Report by the CCTR-Zhongshan University Research Team 28 April 2010
Defining Identity Shift • Several ways to measure “Identity” and “Identity Change:” • we asked people their “identity before moving to ML,” “after moving to ML” and gave choice of: • 1. HK, • 2. basically HK but also Chinese (HK/CH) • 3. Both HK AND Chinese (HK+CH) • 4. Basically Chinese but also Hong Kong (CH/HK) • 5. Chinese (CH) • But since our focus was “identity change” I made up the following Matrix.
Mode of Adaptation • Based on their current identity and how far they moved, we created four categories of “Adaptation:” • 1. assimilators • 2. strong integrators • 3. weak integrators • 4. resisters.
Feeling Nationalistic? • “Liked living on ML,” p<.00 and strong R=.288. • “Satisfied living on ML” p<.00, R=.214 Identity and patriotism are related • “current identity” and “China’s rise” p<.001, R=-.124. • People who became more Chinese after moving to the ML were more likely to support this idea (p<.001, R=-.063). • Of the 35 people who identify as “Chinese” (only), 18 “agreed” and 16 “strongly agreed” with this statement.
Its everywhere but they never confront it! • 25% see it as “Very Serious,” yet only 11 people reported any experience with it. • over 20% of interviewees selected either “no response” or “inconvenient to say” • of 36 people who “liked living on the ML,” 29 selected “don’t know” when asked about the depth of corruption on the mainland. • Respondents who saw corruption as “extremely serious” were overrepresented among those who did not like living on the ML too much (31% vs. 18.9%). • concerns about corruption correlates negatively with “satisfaction with life since moving to the ML” (p<.01, R=-.041), • But mode of adaptation and this issue are not correlated
Support for Human Rights and Individual Freedom • We asked people to compare Human Rights and Individual Freedoms in HK and ML. • 20% of our sample see individual rights as the “same” (18%) or “better” (2.2%) on the ML. • Surprisingly, 45.5% believe that individual freedom on the ML is only a “little less” than in Hong Kong • 31.3% believe that Hong Kong is much freer. • those who “like to live on the ML” have a less critical view of rights and freedoms on the ML (p<.07, R=-.149), relative to HK.
Table 3. Views on Individual Rights and Freedoms in ML and HK, 4 Cities Higher score means more critical views of the quality of Individual Rights and Freedoms in the ML
Human Rights and Individual Freedom: Comparing HK and the Mainland • On “Human Rights and Individual Freedom”, there is no statistical relationship with Mode of Adaptation, • but a significantly smaller number of Assimilators, compared to other categories, felt that Hong Kong was a “much freer society,” with more of them represented in the group that felt that Hong Kong was “somewhat better.” • 34% of the sample picked HK was much freer, but only 21% of Assimilators felt that way.
Here are four tables that show that there is a relationship between the Mode of Adaptation and responses to political factors in the ML.
Ability to Become a Service Oriented Government in 3-5 years Chi-Square = p < 0.09, Pearson’s R = 0.131, p < 0.05
Mode of Adaptation and Current Perception of Government Efficiency Pearson Chi-Square, p<.01, Pearson R = .118, p<.07
Mode of Adaptation and Views on Severity of Inequality in Mainland Chi-Square, p<.05; R=-.127, p<.06
Easier to Affect Government Policy in HK or ML? Chi-Square: p<.001, Pearson R = .131, p<.05
Conclusion • Mode of Adaptation or changes in Identity do have an impact on the political views of HK people living on the ML. • Assimilators tend to be more understanding of the political system, see it more positively and be unwilling to see some of its drawbacks, such as the glaring inequality. • People overall willing to talk about many views, except about Corruption