1 / 12

IT & D1 HeII cooling-variants

WP3 Meeting (24 th of April 2013). IT & D1 HeII cooling-variants. R. van Weelderen (CERN). Overview. Variants for placing cryo -equipment considered Actively cooled parts: ∆T, HX-size as function of total heat load

azuka
Download Presentation

IT & D1 HeII cooling-variants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP3 Meeting (24th of April 2013) IT & D1 HeII cooling-variants R. van Weelderen(CERN)

  2. Overview Variants for placing cryo-equipment considered Actively cooled parts: ∆T, HX-size as function of total heat load Passively cooled parts: Conduction area as function of heat load per meter Summary of requirements as function of HeII-cooling-variant

  3. Variants for placing cryo-equipment considered (1 of 4) passively cooled actively cooled • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Possible QRL-jumper • SM & • QRL-jumper Q1,Q2a,Q2b,Q3: actively cooled for about 41 m, double-HXs(80 mm Ø holes) needed CP & D1 : passively cooled for about 16 m, no HXs needed

  4. Variants for placing cryo-equipment considered (2 of 4) passively cooled actively cooled • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Possible QRL-jumper • SM & • QRL-jumper Q1,Q2a,Q2b,Q3+CP: actively cooled for about 49 m, double-HXs (80 mm Ø holes) needed D1 : passively cooled for about 8 m, no HXs needed

  5. Variants for placing cryo-equipment considered (3 of 4) passively cooled actively cooled actively cooled • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Possible QRL-jumper • SM & • QRL-jumper • Phase-separator • Piping entries/exits Q1,Q2a,Q2b,Q3: actively cooled for about 41 m, double-HXs needed CP : passively cooled for about 8 m, no HXs needed D1 : actively cooled for about 8m, double-HXs needed

  6. Variants for placing cryo-equipment considered (4 of 4) actively cooled actively cooled • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Phase-separator & • Piping entries/exits • Possible QRL-jumper • SM & • QRL-jumper • Phase-separator • Piping entries/exits Q1,Q2a,Q2b,Q3: actively cooled for about 41 m, double-HXs needed CP,D1 : actively cooled for about 16 m, double-HXs needed

  7. Actively cooled IT-parts Total power extraction limited by : # (2) size (80 mm holes) of the HXs For both variants 1 & 2, we can extract the total IT-CP-D1 heat up to a maximum of 550 W with a ∆T < 100 mK.

  8. Passively cooled parts Variant 1: D1+CP conduction area > 300 cm2 Variant 2: D1 conduction area > 130 cm2 Variant 3,4: CP conduction area > ~ 100 cm2 (t.b.c)

  9. Variant 3 and 4 HX comparison Give the saturation temperature at 1.800 the T of the D1 and CP helium bath is dominated by the available HX-Area and Kapitza resistance of the Cu-surfaces: ‘-’ : means HX overflowing and/or T > 2.0 K, non feasible configuration Variant 3, with HX-holes > 69 mm is critically dependent on the HX-area and variations in Kapitza resistance of the Cu surfaces risky configuration Variant 4, with HX-holes penetrating D1 and CP is more robust and can do with HX holes down to 49 mm

  10. Summary If Qtotal < 550 W: Variant 2 if 80 mm holes in CP allowed, if not Variant 3/4 If 550 W < Qtotal < 710 W: Variant 3/4, T-D1 will approach 2.0 K, if possible at least 2x49 (preferably 80 mm) mm holes through D1 and CP Qtotal > ~710 W becomes difficult!

More Related