1 / 30

Structural instruments - Regulatory Context in Brief Overview

Structural instruments - Regulatory Context in Brief Overview. Objectives for Community Support of Regional Policy. Objective 1: For NUTS II regions whose per capita GDP (in PPP) is lower than 75% of EU average (94/96 data) Objective 2: For areas affected by socio-economic restructuring

azure
Download Presentation

Structural instruments - Regulatory Context in Brief Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Structural instruments-Regulatory Contextin Brief Overview

  2. Objectives for Community Support of Regional Policy • Objective 1: For NUTS II regions whose per capita GDP (in PPP) is lower than 75% of EU average (94/96 data) • Objective 2: For areas affected by socio-economic restructuring • Objective 3: For regions not covered by Objective 1 - to support all human resources actions across a Member State

  3. Objective 1 • List of eligible regions decided by the European Commission • 22% of EU population • 69.7% of the funds (136 billion EURO) • Outermost and ex-Objective 6 regions included as Objective 1 regions • Transitional period of 6 or 7 years for areas losing eligibility • Objective 1 funds also for PEACE and Swedish coast programmes

  4. Objective 2 • Total coverage = 18% of EU population • 11,6% of the funds (22,5 billion EURO) • Indicative coverage of 4 strands at EU level: • industrial and service areas (10%) • rural areas (5%) • urban areas (2%) • fisheries-dependent areas (1%) • Transitional period of 6 years for areas losing eligibility

  5. Objective 3 • 12.3% of the funds (24 billion EURO) • Adapting and modernising systems of education, training and employment: • accompanying economic and social changes • lifelong education and training systems • active labour market policies to fight unemployment • promoting social inclusion and equal opportunities

  6. Structural Instruments • European Regional Development Fund • European Social Fund • European Agriculture Guarantee and Guidance Fond(EAGGF) • Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance • Cohesion Fund

  7. European Regional Development Fund Mission: “to redress regional imbalances in Community” “to promote stable and sustainable development” Fields of intervention: • productive investment to create and/or safeguard permanent jobs • infrastructure • endogenous potential • local development • SMEs • technical assistance

  8. European Social Fund Mission:“human resource development and employment” Fields of intervention: • Support for multi-annual National Action Plans • active labour market policies to promote integration • social inclusion/ equal opportunities • lifelong learning systems • training for innovation and adaptability • improved participation of women • Local development and Territorial Employment Pacts • Information society

  9. European Agriculture Guarantee and Guidance Fund(EAGGF) Mission:“support CAP, rural development and improvement of agricultural structures” Fields of intervention: • ‘Accompanying’ measures • early retirement • agri-environment • forestry • less-favoured areas • Other measures • restructuring of farms • setting up of young farmers • training • processing and marketing • Rural development measures

  10. Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance Mission: “balanced resource management and competitive structures” Fields of intervention: • Measures to ensure a sustainable balance to supply and demand • Strengthening competitiveness • Processing and marketing • Revitalisation of fisheries areas

  11. Cohesion Fund • Mission: support for improvement of transport infrastructure and environment • Eligibility criteria: • for countries with a GNP/inhabitant lower than 90% of the EU average • for projects in transport and environment fields • Annual budget: 2,615 billion EURO per year • Review of eligibility in 2003

  12. Planning and use of fundinginstruments (1) Objective 1 • 1 CSF, with 1 OP per region (or SPD if < 1 billion EURO) • funded by the ERDF, ESF, EAGGF-Guidance, FIFG

  13. Planning and use of funding instruments (2) Objective 2 • 1 SPD per region (NUTS II level) • funded by the ERDF, ESF (EAGGF-Guarantee) Objective 3 • 1 SPD per country • funded by the ESF Community Initiatives: one Fund per Initiative

  14. Partnership arrangements (1)A more decentralised cohesion policy • Within the Member States:widening and deepening definition of the partnership • regional and local authorities and other competent authorities • economic and social partners • other competent bodies including NGOs, environmental sector etc. • active involvement of partners in all stages of programming

  15. Partnership arrangements (2)A more decentralised cohesion policy • Between the Commission and the Member States • a clear definition of responsibilities with three key players • the Commission • the programme Management Authority • the Monitoring Committee

  16. Programming: 4 main steps 1. Programme guidance issued by the Commission 2. Development plans submitted by Member States after consultation with partners 3. Adoption of strategy by the Commission: • quantified strategic targets • priorities • funding allocations 4.Detailed programming of measures by Management Authority and Monitoring Committees

  17. Planning and programming timetable • Plans and programmes to cover 7 years (except of transition areas) • Plans submitted by Member States within 4 months after list of eligible regions is concluded • Commission decision within 5 months of receiving plans: CSF or SPD • Commission decision within 5 months of receiving proposed OPs • Member States to submit Programme Complement within 3 months of approval of SPD or OP

  18. Requirements on plans and programmes • Regional Developments Plans: • reinforced ex- ante evaluation • CSF, SPDs: • strategic priorities, financial allocations a. methods of implementation • SPDs and OPs will no longer contain measures, as they did before • Programme Complement: measures, finance by measure, beneficiaries, publicity actions

  19. Programming: who does what? (1) Commission: • determines eligible regions and indicative financial allocations • establishes programme guidance • adopts (modifies) programmes only at the level of strategic priorities • monitories at strategic level • approves large-scale projects (>EURO 50 million)

  20. Programming: who does what? (2) Member State-Managing Authority: • prepares plans • prepares and adopts the programming complement • sub-delegates responsibilities as necessary - global grants • selects projects • prepares annual report • implements the mid-term evaluation • ensures that information and publicity rules are adhered to

  21. Programming: who does what? (3) Member State - Monitoring Committee • agrees on Programming complement • lays down project selection criteria • monitors programme implementation: • proposes programme changes to Management Authority • agrees on proposals to change Programming complement • approves mid-term evaluation • agrees Annual report

  22. Principle of Additionality • ”The Funds may not replace public or other equivalent structural expenditure by the Member State” • Three verifications:ex-ante, mid-term, ex-post • measured against structural expenditures in all Objective 1 regions (for Objective 1)... • ...or expenditures on active labour market policies outside Objective 1 regions (for Objectives 2 and 3)

  23. Ceilings on co-financing rates • calculated at measure level • general conditions unchanged • new ceilings where substantial revenue generated from infrastructure: • Objective 1: 40% + 10% for Cohesion Fund states • Objective 2: 25% • can be 10% higher if not direct grants • and where investment in firms: • Objective 1: 35% • Objective 2: 15% • can be 10% higher for SMEs if not direct grants

  24. Monitoring arrangements:A more transparent implementation • Key annual meetings encounter: • Commission and Management Authority for management questions • Commission and control authorities for control questions • Monitoring of targets for quantified indicators • Mid-term review of implementation • Improved information and publicity system

  25. Evaluation: a tool for better programming • ex-ante evaluation submitted by Member State with plans; new emphasis on • employment situation • environmental impact • equality between men and women • mid-term evaluation implemented by Managing authority using an independent expert: consequences for reprogramming • ex-post evaluation implemented by European Commission by 2009

  26. Financial ManagementCombining simplification and efficiency • Automatic annual commitments • Automatic de-commitment of unused resources • Payment on account of 7% on the adoption of the programme • New system of reimbursements against expenditure incurred • Final payment of 5% at closure of programme • Flat-rate indexation of 2% built into budget with review for 2004-2006

  27. Financial ControlA clearer division of responsibilities • Member States are responsible for: • efficient systems for financial control • prevention of irregularities • correction of irregularities • ensuring compliance with Community law • Commission is responsible for: • checks on efficiency of financial control systems • consequences: possible suspension or cancellation of payments • organisation of annual meetings

  28. The performance reserveA new tool to encourage improved performance • 4% of national resources allocated before 31.3.2004 • Assessment of programme performance based on: • realisation of aims decided ex-ante • the quality of the programme management • the absorption of EU resources and their leverage effect • choice of indicators by Member State, based on proposals by Commission • Member State proposes successful programmes • Allocation of Funds by the Commission

  29. Closing ongoing programmes • Programmes before 1994 • requests for payments until 31.3.2001 • automatic decommitments until 30.9.2001 • Programmes from period 1994-1999: • requests for payments until 31.3.2003 • automatic decommitments until 30.9.2003

  30. Commission implementing decisions • Eligibility of expenditure (article 30) • Use of the EURO (article 33) • Financial control (article 38) • Financial corrections (article 39) • Information and Publicity (article 46) • ….others if necessary

More Related